preview

In Loveland

Good Essays

In the second portion of our class this term, we have focused primarily on narratives that fall under the category of postmodernism. A common link that I have found with majority of the films we’ve watched and the stories we’ve read is that their themes and storyline seem to be open to interpretation, as it is difficult to identify the actually “reality” within the narratives. This is done through a stronger focus on the characters’ thoughts and feelings, as opposed to their actions within a story. In a way, this seems more relatable because for the average person; we have more dialogue going on in our own head rather than the words we actually speak out loud in a given point of time. These narratives also allow us to have a better awareness …show more content…

The narrator imagines his wife is a different person with the scab on her face, Charlie imagines he is the narrator by dressing like him, and perhaps even the narrator’s wife imagines that Charlie is her husband. We can also see that the novel is formatted in a way in which we can see the narrator’s entire thought process, seeing as he starts off talking about himself, allowing us to think that it is a story about himself, however he then ends it with a story about a friend, having little to do with the rest of the narrative, besides a common thread of infidelity and replacement. The narrator also seems to value certain objects in his mind, fetishizing them to the point in which he almost seems to obsess over them. This is true for both his queen sized bed and the scab that forms on his wife’s face. This obsession overcomes the narrator and seems to inspire him both creatively and sexually. If the story had been written in a more traditional form, it would be quite difficult to understand the sense of obsession mixed with the uncertainty behind his fetishism that the postmodern writing highlights so well with its almost “stream of consciousness” …show more content…

Along with having a hard time being present in his own life, the film itself seems to not be true reality as well. At the end of the film, we find out that we have been watching a film within a film within a film. While the main portion is focused on the fictional character of Sandy Bates, he seems to have several similarities with the director, Woody Allen, himself, suggesting that perhaps the film is a reflection of Woody Allen’s own unhappiness with his life, relationships, and maybe even the way people perceive his art. The ending of the movie actually reminds me a bit of the Sorrentino story, “Rockefeller Center” in which the same story is told multiple ways and there is no certainty in knowing what has actually happened. Stardust Memories acting like a metafictional movie also makes it difficult to try to figure out which ending is actually real, though it may not be necessary to have an answer for that. When Sandy is shot so suddenly, I thought that it was like The Killing all over again with a sudden, abrupt ending. But then after playing around with the idea of being dead, even having an entire

Get Access