preview

Imagery In The Grapes Of Wrath

Better Essays

The Grapes of Wrath, written by John Steinbeck in 1939, narrates the long journey of the Joad family, who is forced out of their home in Oklahoma during a time of economic distress by a combination of simple misfortune as well as the greed of large corporations. The Joad family must travel from their home, which now belongs to the bank, to California to find work, along with countless other migrant workers in the same situation. During their pursuit for new lives and paying jobs, the Joads meet and develop relationships with the other families in the lower socioeconomic class; the Joads and these other families are able to maintain their benevolence and dignity in the face of hardship. Throughout the novel, Steinbeck explores numerous universal …show more content…

Amongst the many examples of imagery in the book, the visually descriptive statements in the final chapter of the novel stand out as vital details in the delivery of a powerful demonstration of humanity. As the Joad family, in the book, escape from a flooding boxcar to wait out the rain, Steinbeck includes, “From the right of the road there came a sharp swishing. Ma cried, ‘Hurry up. There’s a big rain. Let’s go through the fence here. It’s shorter. Come on, now! Bear on, Rosasharn.’ They half dragged the girl across the ditch, helped her through the fence. And the storm struck them. Sheets of rain fell on them. They plowed through the mud and up the little incline. The black barn was nearly obscured by the rain. It hissed and splashed, and the growing wind drove it along” (Page 453). In the barn, the Joads meet a sick man and his son, and the man is described with the following phrases: “Starvin’. He ain’t et for six days.” “He was about fifty, his whiskery face gaunt, and his open eyes were vague and staring.” “Can’t hardly move.” “Wasted face, frightened eyes” (Page 454). The chapter culminates with Rose of Sharon, Ma and Pa Joad’s daughter, allowing the sick man to drink her breast milk so as not to starve to death in …show more content…

Early on in the novel, the Joad family must make the decision of whether or not to allow Jim Casy, a former reverend, to join the family on their trip to California. In the tenth chapter, the discussion falls to Ma and Pa Joad. When Pa expresses doubt in their ability to support another person during the journey, Ma responds, “It ain’t kin we? It’s will we? As far as ‘kin,’ we can’t do nothing’, not go to California or nothin’; but as far as ‘will,’ why, we’ll do what we will. An’ as far as ‘will’-- its a long time our folks been here and east before, and’ I never heerd tell of no Joads or no Hazletts, neither, ever refusing’ food an’ shelter or a lift on the road to anybody that asked. They’s been mean Joads, but never that mean” (Page 102). In essence, Ma tells Pa that they will not refuse to help this man because that is not what Joads do. Though there are many examples of the Joad family acting compassionately in the novel, this discussion best exemplifies the concept of dignity as a result of humanity. Ma clearly explains that Joads are not those kinds of people—people that are willing to leave behind another despite having the ability to help them. Naturally, Ma is expressing that they have standards. If they leave Jim Casy behind, they cannot respect themselves. Basically, even though

Get Access