I’m So Totally Digitally Close To You

In his essay, “Get Over It,” Jeff Jarvis argues that “ . . . our supposed privacy crisis, . . . could result in our missing many of the opportunities the net affords to connect with each other and with information” (430). On the other hand, Andrew Keen, in “Sharing is a Trap,” states that “. . . this increasingly ubiquitous social network . . . is invading the 'sacred precincts' of private and domestic life” (426). With all the posting, tweeting, and blogging privet lives have become open to the public. SMS, emails and even calls are being traced, recorded and reviewed every day, you are not safe on the internet. Keen’s argument regarding social media is valid in regard to the transformative nature of the Internet, privacy and “publicness.”

Dvorak’s argument is of little conjecture. While the text starts by commenting on Facebook’s “cavalier lack of concern over privacy issues, it continues down a completely different path, criticizing the users instead. This falsely-led introduction brings the readers to believe that the article is about privacy concerns instead of the ignorant mannerisms of the people using it.

Social media is a revolution that has taken the world by storm. So many times we miss out on important happenings due to a strayed second from online. Whether it is homework a teacher has posted on MyCourses or the latest breaking news released on twitter, without constant eyes on the internet, we are bound to be left behind and disconnected. The topic of being connected is dissected by Lucy Marcus’s article, “What It Means To Be ‘Connected’” and Steven Krause’s article “Living Within Social Networks.” These articles both dive into the question of what it truly means to be connected with the outside world and the online world. Marcus believes that now is an important time to be connected more than ever on both social media and real life (124). In contrast, Krause asks the readers whether internet connection is ultimately making them lonely and

In Sherman Alexie’s poem “The Facebook Sonnet” Alexie brings up a controversy, over all social media because it absorbs society into the depths of dark unknowns and prevents physical face to face communication. Even though Facebook allows people to stay up to date with friends, whether they be new or deep-rooted, the platform tears its users away from substantial social interaction with others. People can connect to the world by the click of the mouse and know what is going on at any given time. Social media requires ones everlasting attention, and the addiction is almost comparable to that of a cigarette, one cannot give it up and is always thinking about when one can check it again. People become so caught up in trying to perceive what everyone else is doing, they forget that they have a reality to live and fail to maintain real relationships. “The Facebook Sonnet” belittles the social media platform by emphasizing how obsessed society is with making themselves look perfect for the screen. One is either gripping to their past or obsessing over the present.

In Stephen Marche article “Is Facebook making us lonely?” the author explores the effect of technology and Facebook, specifically social media, on people’s lives. One of Marche’s main points is that the technology has become more advanced. In just one click of the button we can find out what is going on in our country as well as the outside world. We are isolated from the real world and one another since we do not have face-to-face interactions. Marche contributes his findings to the rise in social media which is Facebook. He believed that the more connected we are to social media, the lonelier we become. . Facebook has created a fear that is interfering with our real friendships, distancing us from one another and making us lonelier. Another

Author, Senior editor of The New Atlantis, and fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, Christine Rosen, in her article “Virtual Friendships and the New Narcissism,” analyzes if technology can provide what it promises- “a surer sense of who we are and where we belong.” Rosen’s purpose of her article is to argue that social networking sites are doing more harm than good. Rosen uses multiple studies and quotes to present her argument.

Facebook has definitely revolutionized communication and can be fun and convenient when it is used properly. My family has always been close knit and no matter where we are in the world we are always able to actively keep in contact thanks to communication means such as Facebook.

Over the past decade, a visible social movement has been induced by the uprising of media and websites. However, it has undoubtedly peaked during the last couple of years. With the steady establishment of new social networks, there are varying viewpoints regarding the time the majority of people spend fixed to a screen. This is certainly food for thought. Is society isolating itself from face-to-face contact and resorting to online relationships? Possibly. But are such actions always critical and destructive? Opinions range on the subject. Through the analyzation of the argument, using examples such as an article by Barry Cooper, "Infatuation with Facebook friends knows no limits," the common myth of Echo and Narcissus, and a personal perspective,

People are interacting with more people online but in peoples ‘real lives’ they do not have the same social connections as they once did with the technological advances of the Internet and Social Networking Sites. People have more options for social connections as networks have the potential to go beyond a close social network. The focus of this essay will be on the idea of if we live in an age of Networked Individualism. This theory will be analyzed by the use of Social Networking Sites, in particular,

These days it seems that the Internet, a post-modern medium, something so complex and vital to our society as being reduce to a mere antiquity of personal feuds and interactive relationships (or at least the satisfaction of what seems like a relationship) between people. The rise of social media applications like Twitter and Facebook allows people to voice their opinions to wider audience, creating a pluralist, postmodern medium in which questions raised about the impact of mediated relationships have surely increased. What is particularly interesting about Twitter (and to a lesser extent Facebook) is the newfound proximity we ‘normal people’ have to modern

Social media such as Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, Instagram, and Flicker was invented to keep us in touch and keep us closer to our family and friends. But according to How Facebook ruins Friendships “we took our friendship online” (Bernstein). First we began communicating more by email than by phone and then switched to instant messaging or texting. By joining social Medias online

Facebook was designed to help people connect and communicate with each other. However, Zuckerberg himself said “…you know, Facebook is not a static thing…” (Zuckerberg, Highlights from Q&A with Mark). This constant transformation of Facebook is slowly but surely pushing the boundaries of what we as humans had and has gradually given us something of which the implications go far beyond what anyone could have imagined 11 years ago when Facebook was first

There are many changes has been made during the service time of Facebook, it impacts a lot of users. Criticisms made wide range of view on its privacy issues, child safety and hate speeches. In this essay, we are going to talk about the privacy issues that people concern about on Facebook and how it impact people after certain changes have been made by Facebook.

This paper will explore the freedom of information and privacy as it relates to social media postings with a particular look at Facebook (FB) and the issues that surround this social media giant. Social media in general and FB specifically have become an avenue to share ones thoughts and ideas, as well as daily events and plans much like people did years ago by using a diary. However, unlike notes in a diary, posts on FB may be seen by the masses. Today’s online posts can have serious ramifications if its content is controversial, or even ostensibly benign. While the old diary of events was memorialized after the events took place, and then later shared only with a select few, today's social posts are documented as they take place, and

Actually, there are many advantages of using Facebook. The most common reason for people to use Facebook is to keep in contact with their friends and family. Since Facebook is free, it has become more useful than e-mails or telephones. Using the telephones can be costly especially when it comes to long-distance calls. As for e-mails, they seem to take longer for people to respond to. Therefore Facebook seems to be the best option for