In the centuries of rule among the ancient Greek polis, we can see examples of monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy, and democracy. As no city-state is alike, there are differences in how these forms existed from polis to polis. Scholars may still argue over the appropriate label for some of the forms of rule.
Martin notes that word aristocracy translates to "rule of the best" whereas we commonly use the term to indicate rule of wealthy families in which power is passed down but not formalized by edicts or laws (p.41). Given the common use, I will use the term to for the rule of families not ratified by law. Athens had this type of rule in which wealthy land owners welded much power over the people until the demes later broke up
…show more content…
Martin cites a few examples of tyranny in ancient Greece. One of the earliest recorded accounts occurred on the island of Corinth near 657 B.C.E. A family named the Bacchiads took control from the existing oligarchy. It was during the Bacchiad rule that the city-state developed naval technology and subsequently flourished economically. The rule of the Bacchiads was less successful. They were noted as being loathed for their violent tactics with the Corinth people. A popular citizen, Cypseilus, eventually overthrew the Bacchiads to secure sole rule for himself. Athens also had a tyranny with the rule of Psistratus who rallied wealthy friends and the poor to support his claim to powere. This rule was passed on to his son, Hippias. He was known to appoint friends and family to elite posts. This rule was ended with Cleisthenes (1996, p. 86-87).
It was also the aforementioned Cleisthenes who assisted in bringing democracy to Athens according to Martin. Around 500 B.C.E., he introduced a system of denes in which citizens would gather to vote on city-state matter while managing their domestic issues of their respective demes (1996, p. 88). This representative system morphed into a direct democracy in which each citizen could gather and vote on matters, but this was still limited to the male citizens leaving women, slaves, and those unable to attend the vote (Brand,
Sparta had a mixed government consisting of elements of monarchy, oligarchy and democracy. The monarchy, although not a true monarchy, consisted of two kings from separate royal tribes. These kings were subject to the will of the Gerousia and the Ephors and
When evaluating the government of ancient Athens, some might say that it was a democracy, however, it can be better described as an oligarchy: a form of government in which a small group of people has the power and control (Doc. D by Mogens Herman Hansen). A democracy takes all the citizens’ opinions and thoughts into account, unlike an oligarchy that only takes the male citizens’ opinions and thoughts into account. Thus, Athens is more similar to an oligarchy than a democracy. The people of Athens also decide as a whole what the best government for their city-state was, as opposed to a democracy where the people elect representatives to make decisions for them and their city-state. Athens could be seen as not a true democracy because of the lack of basic democratic rules and methods such as what they define democracy as, who is able to vote, and how they vote.
Let’s see what is Monarchy? It is a king or queen who gets all the powers of authority from inheritance and power stays in the same family, usually the bloodline from father to son. In Ancient Greeks, there weren’t too many monarchies, but there was some present and even Athens went under the monarchy at the end of the classical period which ended with the death of Alexander the Great. His father Phillip II of Macedon who became king after the deaths of his two brothers conquered Athens after the Peloponnesian war and ended democracy in the great city of Athens. (Wasson, 2014)
In the ancient Greek city-states and over many centuries, the government (political power) took many forms: held by a single individual: (monarchies and tyrants), or by a select few (oligarchies and aristocracies), or by every male citizen (democracy). A monarchy is a type of governance of the people by a single individual, with the power retained by blood lines. In the pre-Classical period, ancient Greece was composed of small geographic units ruled by a local king. People in these small geographic units, paid taxes to the king, obeyed his laws, and depended on him for their defense.
Classical Greek Era, one of the most advanced eras ahead of its time. However, what made the democracy that the Greeks established so significant to the Greece’s overall development? How did they do it? How did the Greek democracy last for long as it did? What factors caused the downfall of the infamous Greek democracy?
Though there were numerous factors involved in the fall of tyranny, the main cause for the Greek’s tyrannic end was the actions made by the Aristocrats. Tyrants desired to take away control from the Aristocrat’s and gain their power. They were able to come into a place of absolute rule by gaining favor from the Greeks. The majority of the Greeks were poor, so tyrants catered to the poverty-stricken in order to be supported (“What is Tyranny?”). Tyrants provided for their people by building structures like aqueducts that could be used to greatly benefit the poor by supplying a vital source needed for survival -clean water (“Tyranny”).
In order to establish dominance, rulers during the Hellenistic period liked their power with the gods. This created a sense of unity between places of different rulers. These rulers never had the same connection with their people as the Greeks had for their polis. These rulers usually paid professionals to make their political decisions and full-time soldiers to fight their battles. Alexander’s greatest contribution to Greece was Hellenization.
In the mid 600s BCE, Greece poleis transitioned from oligarchy (malignant) to tyranny (malignant) although both rules of government were destructive for the general population. The multiple rulers of oligarchy were forced to resign their power to a single king who unlawfully obtained power across city-states. “Most Greek tyrants were military leaders who gained the support of the people by promising them more rights” (THHS at Queens College, n.d.). After Greece could no longer tolerate tyranny (malignant), another rule of government would emerge for the people of the
Every city-state was unique and different form one another. Not one polis was the same as another. They strived to have their own identity. Ancient Greek was mainly hundreds of city-states among the region acting as their own independent corridor. The importance of the polis is what
Governmental systems from antiquity through modern eras seem to display the progression of cultural maturity and regression. An aristocrat could “bequeath” their social status to descendants. Over several generations, the masses may solicit the elite for input on a social challenge, perhaps assuming that their “success” – which could be nothing more than descended imagery, conveys intellectual prowess. Again, over generations, the aristocratic families become monarchies, whereas power and influence are incumbent with birth and usually protected by legislative means derived through their ancestral
Ancient Greece underwent many political changes and therefore experienced various forms of government including monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy and democracy. First, I will be defining each form of government. Then, I will explain how Athens alone was affected by each of these.
In the early days the government of these cities was led by a Patriarchal Monarchy, but in the seventh century A.C. begin to make their influence felt oligarchies clan chiefs. Here begins a period of struggles between its different factions until about the year 500 B.C. appear the "tyrants" who present themselves as the protectors of the masses. These tyrants were overthrown because of their despotic governments and excesses committed by mercenary armies which supported his mandate. Again the struggle between the old aristocracy and democracy for control of the city-states is renewed, this led to different forms of government of which the most representative and interesting are the political organizations of Sparta and Athens. The system of
Oligarchy: Oligachy is a government by the few rich who take decisions affecting the people. This form of government is easily abused into aristocratic or tyrannical government. Truly oligarchy was practiced very well in both ancient Greek city-states of Athens and Sparta. It could be reasoned to have led to selecting one among them to lead the people in a particular case, which either usually led to good decisions like in Athens into democratic principles of governance or bad decisions of aristocratic or tyrannical leaders as evidenced in
Even though Ancient Greece went through three different governments, the experienced Democracy, which we use some form of today. In Ancient Greece, the government started as a Monarchy. I guess that they decided that one person having all the power wasn’t right for them, the civilization swapped to being a Democracy. Although Democracy wasn’t the first choice of the Greeks, they still used it for a decent amount of time. After some time, Oligarchy sounded very appealing to Greece, so they shuffled over to the Oligarchy side, which was way more prominent at the time. They stayed as an Oligarchy until the Romans took over. Although democracies weren’t very well-known at the time, Greece was one of the first civilizations to use Democracy as their government, which America uses as our government.
Ancient Greece was once a very united country, but subsequently got divided into various states such as Athens, Sparta, and Corinth. The two largest of these states, most powerful and ultimately most influential ones were Athens and Sparta. The governments of the city-states varied very widely in nature. After their separation, most of the states retained the original form of government inherited from the original Greek state for some time. As time went on, they began seeking for better ways to govern themselves and that leads to many of them adopting different styles.