I Needed For The State And The Restoration Of The Monarchy

The purpose of this battle analysis is to discuss how Army Intelligence failed to give adequate size

Hobbes, you are adamant in the claim that an absolute monarchy is the best type of government. However, it is clear that too much power in the hands of one individual will lead to corruption. You believe that people are prone to corruption and wrong deeds. With power solely rested on the divine rulers shoulders, should he fail, the nation will crumble. This kind of government could be toppled very easily, and a lack of a stable system set up in place should the monarch die would mean chaos would run rampant throughout the nation.

Occasionally celebrated with ceremonial tributes to an earlier period of history, today’s constitutional monarchies sometimes mark such affairs with the pomp and circumstance associated with an altogether different era.

They probably think they have power to decide what's right. The colonies voted for them to represent them. In the Declaration they state that whenever the system of government doesn't work for they colonist, they do have the right to change it. All the problems listed there on the paper such as taxes with out representation in Parliament or trials without jurisdiction. These are major problems that need to be resolved. In the Declaration describe King George III as a prince who is described by his actions, which is true. So, the signers of the Declaration of Independence do have the right to change the system of government. Especially, with them being elected and the King acting like a big jerk. My answer still stands that they do have the

These strategies, not far off the ones used today, saved the Empire money and soldiers, a vital resource to the Empire. In order to maintain the level of soldiers in their army, commanders were expected to try and find a way to avoid open battles against the enemy’s main attack force. They

Being powerful includes being mature, effective, and important, all qualities Maria Theresa posses. ¨Maria Theresa helped initiate financial and educational reforms, promoted commerce and the development of agriculture, and reorganized the army, all of which strengthened Austria's resources¨ (Crankshaw). Before Maria Theresa, the army didn't win many battles. She transformed an army of almost nothing into an army of great power. In addition, the educational reforms she established made education a possibility for boys and some girls.

Ex. 3: “Queen Elizabeth I was an exceptional ruler, who reformed the church, economy, and England itself. She brought peace in church and even throughout England. Elizabeth I even spread literacy and arts throughout England.”

The structures of the Roman and Mongolian armies were clearly defined and created the standard of militaristic organization for modern day militaries. The commanders of armies are what eventually determine if victory is achieved. The well-organized machine requires a brain to control it, and likewise the structured armies of Mongolia and Rome needed generals of talent to direct their destructive force towards a beneficial objective. Roman and Mongolian officers were given specific objectives, but were allowed to achieve those objectives however they determined. This freedom

Mother Theresa simply believed that everyone deserved to die in a loving and caring atmosphere and so she did, all who come across her experience such love. To me she had wisdom of the heart; this means that one being with others who need us with ones whole

princess Elisabeth of Bohemia was a noble woman. She was raised by her grandmother and aunt, but soon left to go live with her parents in Holland. Princess Elisabeth was an intelligent woman who excelled in everything, including music, dancing, and art. She is mainly known for her correspondence with philosopher Rene Descartes. Throughout the seventeenth century, Elisabeth wrote letters to Descartes commenting and criticizing his and the works of others.

Fortunately these mishaps did not compromise the greatness of her reign, and were fairly minor. During a few of the wars that took place during her reign, Maria Theresa could not find a general for her army which resulted in disorganized men. Another flaw to Maria Theresa’s ruling was that she did not focus on military strength. Disorganization of the army combined with a struggling military made obtaining victories much harder than usual. Defeat constantly brought down Maria Theresa’s morale and effectiveness, which affected others as well (“Maria Theresa of Austria”).

In more ways than one, Mother Teresa shows the qualities of being an incredible mentor to others (Hentschel).

“Napoleon practiced extreme centralization of authority. The Emperor was his own operations officer and made all decisions” (Rothenberg, 66-67). Clausewitz pronounced Napoleon as the ‘god of war’ and his tactical and operational successes, particularly between 1805-1807, are described as that of a military genius (Clausewitz, 583, 648). The command and control system he had in place was adequate when he was present, but “when his armies operated in widely separated theaters of war, or over an extended front, his attempts to maintain strategic control failed” (Rothenberg, 67). The strategic overreach of the Grand Army coupled with an increasing inability to trust his senior army and naval flag officers during decisive battles exploited the weakness of his system of centralized command and control. This manifested itself in 1812 when the Grand Army was fighting on two fronts at opposite ends of the continent, as evidenced by unsuccessful operational outcomes and significant battlefield

Although his armies enjoyed unprecedented successes and expanded the French Empire from Spain to the steppes of Russia, the Napoleonic way of war was fraught with deficiencies. Due to the Napoleon's genius and mastery of this period of military manoeuvres, he was able to forestall the affects of the inherent limitations of his system until the war of the Sixth Coalition (1813) and eventually the fateful battle of Waterloo (1815). One the most significant, intrinsic flaws in Napoleon's system was related to issues of command. During the beginnings of Napoleon's career, he commanded armies of sizes up to 60 000 troops. In Italy in 1796, he commanded a force of just 38 000. With the increasing sizes of forces in the later empire, due to concepts such as levee en masse and recruitment legislation of 1792, the inability of a single commander to control such vast forces was becoming apparent. The sheer immensity of the forces now mustered was unprecedented. In 1812 the Grande Armee, consisted of a staggering 611 000 soldiers. Much to the hindrance of the later empire, few, if any officers in the Grande Armee, besides Napoleon himself, could command forces

Everyone knows that Napoleon was a great leader and commander but it is not as cut and dry as popular history makes it out to be. His great victory at Austerlitz cemented him as one of the greatest commanders in history. This battle is was a tactical masterpiece up there with Gaugamela and Cannae. However, there is more to analyze here than just the battle itself. Many aspects of war include mobilization, supply, training, moral, army structure etc. and all play a part in Napoleon’s victories and the creation of the French Empire. Another variable to consider is the quality of the armies led by Tsar Alexander I of Russia and the Holy Roman Emperor, Francis II of Austria. The focus here is to look at how these aspects played a role in