preview

Hypocrisy In The Salem Witch Trials

Decent Essays

In the court system today, an individual fallen suspect to a crime is innocent until proven guilty. Despite what a person’s familiarity with court proceedings may be, this idea is common knowledge, and essentially logic; if guilt of a crime cannot be proven with factual evidence, one cannot be prosecuted. However, in 1692 Salem, Massachusetts, this was not the case. Paralleling today, Salem court proceedings were held to determine an individual’s innocence or guilt, but that is the extent of the similarity. Salem’s crooked, corrupted courthouses sat on a foundation of spectral evidence. Through the duration of the witch trials, innocent people died clinging to the truth, while the noose they hanged from symbolized the “he said, she said” notion that deemed them guilty. The Salem courts were ever-changing and built upon contradiction, corruption, and hypocrisy—this corruption essentially killed each innocent life. Anne Hutchinson, a woman who lived in Puritanical New England not long before the Salem trials occurred, was a prime example of just how corrupt and hypocritical the courts of that time were. Salem, and New England in its entirety, were Puritanical theocracies—religion and government were inextricably linked. Anne was synonymous with the people of 1692 Salem in that her faith was her lifeline. Faith was such a prominent part of Anne’s life that she began to host religious meetings at her house where she could speak of and preach her religious beliefs freely, or so

Get Access