Humphrey Jennings’s and Stewart McAllister’s Listen to Britain is a short British propaganda documentary. Within the twenty-minute film, it presented characteristics that fit the expository, observational, and poetic style of documentary. At the beginning of the film, there is a narrator that directly addresses the audience. This forward narration is one of the key characteristics of an expository documentary. Narration appears again later in the film in the form of a montage of radio news clips. The documentary is also an observational one as in most scenes the camera served as a fly on the wall that allowed the audience to feel as if they were physically in the scenes. At the beginning, these shots were presented in an order that were used to help the narrative. The audience sees a woman place a candle …show more content…
The documentary is both observational and reflexive. Most of the time during the film, the audience feels as if they are part of the action. During the concerts, they see the band from multiple angles including being on the stage with them as well as being in the audience. However, during the performance of “Satisfaction” the drummer, Charlie Watts, looks directly into the camera for an extended period of time which is startling to the audience. The film is reflexive as the audience is aware of the filmmaking process. The film cuts between actual documentary clips and the band watching the clips that the audience just viewed. At one point when watching the footage of a man with a gun and a Hells Angel with a knife, Mick Jagger asks, “Can you roll back, David?” He is talking directly to one of the directors, David Maysles. The audience is also able to see camera men in the audience and on stage with large cameras that stand out, making them aware that footage is being filmed for the
Through revealing that actors had in fact portrayed Polley’s family, the film sets out to emphasise the reliability and truthfulness of the documentary as well as the recounts. Without notifying the audience that such archival footage was fake and placing this revelation at the end of the film allows the audience to really consider what the “truth” is. When asked about the making of the film, Harry Gulkin, Polley’s biological father, states that the truth is a subjective narrative, that these “narratives are shaped in part by their relationship to the person who told it to them, and by the events” (Stories We Tell 2012). Additionally, Polley states, “the way her mother’s story changed depended on who was going the telling” (Vulture, 2013). This point is what resonates from the film and its purpose – that the there are different sides to the truth; one truth to one person is false to another.
Firstly, it is important to understand how the documentary form is best suited to illustrate the film’s theme. In order to do this, one must have an overview of the documentary style of filmmaking. Documentaries concern themselves with the “exploration of
Haraway with Karl Fontenot and an ex-con Odell Titsworth. He was locked up in the jail but was not charge with anything. Karl Fontenot was also arrested and was questioned for an hour and a half. First he denied any involvement but under police constant pressure, he too made a videotaped “confession”. During the second trial, a psychiatrist examined Fontenot and believed that because of low intelligence, Fontenot did not understood his Miranda rights and the meaning of a ‘confession’ and lied to the police in order to get attention (481).
What would a Legal Positivist have to say about the Dudley and Stephens’ Case and why would they say it?
The movie is shot as a documentary about a British band in the 1980’s while they are on tour in the United States. Eventually through a series of mishaps, the popularity of the band starts to wane. We learn that the band has troubles keeping drummers, the permanent members are not exactly the brightest, and reminiscent to Yoko Ono, one of the main character’s girlfriend starts to interject herself into the band’s business.
A documentary is a genre of film that provides a factual report on a particular story, viewpoint, message or experience. In this essay, two documentaries, Bowling for columbine by Michael Moore and Made in Bangladesh by CBC news will be explored to show how persuasive techniques are used to make an audience feel a particular way.
The idea of a documentary being an artistic or even personalised expression of a director is long gone, or so it seems in recent times. In Michael Moore’s latest documentary, Bowling for Columbine, he attempts to get across to viewers his, and essentially only his point of view, on the topic of gun laws. Although what Moore is trying to say is not necessarily wrong, he is at the same time not taking into account the other side of the argument either; all he is trying to do, essentially is hypnotise viewers into thinking
The phenomenological approach is considered holistic, not reductionist. The method is an effort to understand religion and to accurately describe what religious people think there doing. Cunningham and Kelsay insist, “At its simplest, a phenomenological approach leads to an effort to understand religious thought and behavior from the point of view of religious persons.” This means that if a person says that a certain object is sacred, we start to believe them that the object is sacred because of our human conscious. The goal of the method is to attempt to understand the sacred because it is the spirit of religion. One of the elements of religion explained by Cunningham and Kelsay is action. Action is how people behave and it shows the
Richardson’s non-interventionist style is a prime example of observational documentary, and works specifically well in capturing and promulgating the subject of death. According to Nichols, observational documentaries started appearing in the 1960’s as result of more mobile and smaller equipment. Furthermore, observational documentary stresses non-intervention, as filmmakers objectively observe indirect speech, candidness in the form of long takes, and create a world out of historical reality not fabricated with
The aim of this essay is to demonstrate the assessment process of a patient using the Roper Logan and Tierney (RLT) model of nursing framework and to show how the nursing process works alongside this model. This will be shown by a holistic history of the patient being shown, followed by how the RLT model is applicable to this patient. This is then followed by one nursing intervention being discussed showing how the nursing process is applied to patient care. The patient will be referred to as Mr Frederick Valentine to protect the patient’s anonymity as stated in the Nursing and Midwifery Council Code of Conduct (2008) guidelines.
For this week’s post I listened to Orson Welles and The Mercury Theater’s ‘War of the Worlds’ radio broadcast. The broadcast is one hour – long and what seems to be about an alien invasion in New Jersey. My first reaction to this post even before listening to the broadcast or reading articles was a little uneasy. You can say that I was a little anxious about this post due to my personal beliefs of not speaking about the unknown; however I will not be getting an F any time sooner. Anyways, I don’t listen to the radio unless it’s music related so you can surely understand why I would not be interested in a radio adaptation of a novel, especially one related with alien invasions. This broadcast, however left me wanting more even after being scared
In the film “The Truman Show”, directed by Peter Weir, many techniques are strategically used to position the audience to respond emotionally to Truman Burbank. Techniques such as lighting, music, camera shots and angles are used in three specific scenes throughout the film co-ordinated by the shows director Christof. He uses these techniques to encourage the show’s audience to believe that what they are watching is unscripted and real.
As the narrator of “London” walks the streets, he hears a variety of different sounds. The state of London is so terrible that he can hear their “manacles” (line 8) in every “cry of every Man” (5) and in “every voice” (7). Child labor is tragic, but the “chimney-sweeper’s cry” (9) “appalls” (10) the Church, rather pitying it. The government also does nothing to ease the “Soldier’s sigh” (11). The institutions in control
The 2010 critically acclaimed film “The Kings Speech” aimed to showcase the struggles of King George VI as he dealt with his stammer and becoming King. The tale follows the King along with his therapist Lionel Logue, as they try and find the best way to cope with the issue before the Kings first wartime radio broadcast. Although this movie is just a film adaptation of a true story, it is still able to show the viewer a lot about British Culture during the 1920’s, which has even carried into the modern day. Additionally, “The Kings Speech” reveals the importance of saving face as well as power distance within the United Kingdom.
I want to start off by clarifying the three main people in this case. They are Jack Wright, John Rock, and Sam Bigger. There are a few other people as well, but they are not worth noting. Jack is the CEO of Dryden Corporation and John is the CEO of Mega Corporation. John has been talking to Jack about the possibility of joining Mega Corporation’s board of directors. Sam Bigger is the chairman and former CEO of Mega Corporation. They need an answer from Jack by the end of the month in order to get his name in for nomination. However, there are some issues that Jack wants to think through and discuss with his wife before making a decision.