How To Solve The Milgram Experiment

The Milgram Experiment conducted at Yale University in 1963, focused on whether a person would follow instructions from someone showing authority. Students (actors) were asked questions by the teachers (participants), if the students got the answer wrong they would receive a shock each higher than the previous. The shocks ranged from Slight shock (15v) to Danger! (300v) to XXX (450v). Stanley Milgram wanted to know if people would do things just because someone with authority told them to, even if it was hurting someone. I believe that the experiment was a good way to test the obedience of people

Throughout the experiment, the guards ended up brutally treating the prisoners even though it was just an experiment. Zimbardo explains at the end of the video that the guards did this because they had no higher authority figure monitoring their actions. Eventually they become so carried away in their roles that they became too power

The experiment escalated when the prisoners were forced to endure cruel and dehumanizing abuse at the hands of their peers.” (Stanford Library 2024). The behavior of the guards that went unhindered by Zimbardo was a result of fallacies during the experiment due to unrealistic punishments. Later in this article it was said that “Guards were allowed to abuse their power to humiliate the inmates”. They had prisoners count off and do pushups arbitrarily, restricted access to bathrooms, and forced them to relieve themselves in buckets in their cells.”

They wore them down by the antics I mentioned above and I think the prisoners also came to the realization that there is nothing that can do to change their situation they have no authority or control. Although his experiment was viewed as controversial and iconic. I cannot in any way, shape or form justify a research permissible within the current ACJS ethical standards. I don’t believe any experiments could top the Philip Zimbardo’s Stanford prison experiment. How could you replicate or create an experiment similar to this one if there was no rules or guidelines to adhere by? By having no rules or guidelines is what made this experiment one of a kind and unique. Even by the ACJS ethical standards applied in my eyes, I still view it as unjust and unethical. I don’t believe that these standards should be altered so as to permit this type of research. I believe experiments like this have no place in Psychology. Despite the punishment, the individuals

The guards behaved cruelly even though they knew it was a simulation and were not told to behave in such a manner. This can help me understand why people act differently in situations. The experiment also taught me that when psychologists or anyone conducts an experiment or study, they need to be very careful about how they treat the subjects because if they don’t it can be seen as unethical and wrong. The experiment was very interesting and informing, but it got out of control and became

I believe this experiment is useful for several reasons. The first reason is it a great example of how easily people can conform to the roles that they are given. Another reason is that it didn’t cause any extensive emotional or physical suffering after the experiment. This experiment also teaches other researchers what not to do. Despite the important findings, I do not think that any similar experiments should happen again because of the abuse some students

Everyone’s overall behavior became very negative, with the intentions to harm one another, even though their engagements were positive and negative. They engaged in verbal abuse, increasing daily, and a few became extremely emotional, enraged and depressed within a short amount of time. Although, most of the chosen inmates were willing to terminate and forfeit their monetary rewards due to the hostile demands and interactions, the guards would have been willing to extend their roles of power and control. Each guard was on time for their assignment and also willing to stay a few extra hours, while only one was emotionally distressed by witnessing the affliction of the

The prisoners were emotionally and mentally harmed during the experiment. The prisoners started to lose their identity, and instead started identifying themselves as their number. One participant even went on a hunger strike for the time that he was in the prison. Another participant had to leave the study because he became excessively disturbed as time went on. After the study was done, people had trouble separating what the people did in the study to how they were in real life, which caused a problem when they all had to meet after the trial was over. This ethical violation is very apparent because Dr. Zimbardo did have to end the study before the two weeks was done.

An unethical violation was that the prisoner’s agreed to a consent form that established there would be no physical harm. That violation was broken when the guards began to hit the prisoners, and physically abuse them. This confirms that their consent forms were broken and that should of concluded the experiment, but it was still being conducted. Another unethical violation was that the experiment creased mental and psychological effects to the participants. The prisoners experienced long term traumas due to the events they had with gone.

I believe that although valuable information came from it, the ethical quality of this experiment is very questionable. I suspected that the guards would turn more authoritative than any of them would have in real life, but I never thought that they would go as far as ridiculing some prisoners to tears. Although there were none of the prisoners had any long term effects from participating, while in the experiment they would be harassed and punished for no reason, which is where I think the experiment should have been discontinued. Control of the experiment was lost as everybody involved, including Zimbardo became completely engulfed in their roles of the prison. This really makes me question Zimbardo and the other researchers to how they could be too involved in their own experiment to stop the experiment when it began to grow out of control. I think that in the experiment the guards showed who they really were. None of them would have acted that way in their own lives. Zimbardo watched all of this on a hidden camera, and didn’t do anything until long after I along with many others think it should have been. It’s not only that the participants didn’t see the unethical characteristics of this experiment, a priest that was called in and the prisoners parents that came for a visitation day didn’t protest the treatment of their sons after hearing stories of the mock prison. There is something about these symbols of

It could be argued that more strict action was required to control misbehaving inmates, but the abuse and dehumanizing treatment of the prisoners was nowhere near acceptable. Although both groups acted unjustly towards the other group it was expected that the guards would act more fairly and be more respectful to the prisoners even if prisoners had acted out of line in some way. After many prisoners suffered severe psychological trauma the experiment was abruptly ended

The Standford Prison Experiment was designed to show the development of norms and how the socialization of the roles would proceed in the prison environment. I strongly believe that this experiment was highly unethical because the prisoners were forced to break norms that they would not have done otherwise. The guards believed that in order to maintain control in the prison, they must resort to unreasonable punishments like cleaning the toilets with their hands or be locked in confinement. I do not believe that this experiment would be able to be repeated in today's society. This experiment caused psychological problems and distress to the prisoners. The participants became their roles and lost their self control and respect. The results of

I believe it was unethical to do the experiment using college students. In fact, many of them could be traumatized from the experience for the rest of their life. In the experiment, I believe they crossed the line at strip searching the prisoners as well as making fun of their bodies and humiliating them. Though I believe that is when they crossed the line first, I also believe they crossed it many times. For instance, waking them up at all hours and making them scrub the toilets with their hands and do other meaningless things.

Additionally, there were fallacies in the procedures in which the experiment took place. Specifically, the test subjects were not told they would be arrested at their homes, yet this had happened. (Haney, C., Zimbardo, P. G .., & Banks, C.,1973). In terms of mental and physical distress, the prisoners were not given any sort of protection from the experiment, and many people saw this as being ethically inhumane. (Haney, C., Zimbardo, P. G .., & Banks, C.,1973).

The Holocaust Did you know that Adolf Hitler was the one with the with evil mind and the leader of the mass murders of the Jews which they called the Holocaust. In my essay i am going to tell you about the Holocaust and what it did to the Jews and how it affected others etc. To begin with I am going to tell you what the Holocaust was. The Holocaust was the systematic bureaucratic, state- sponsored persecution and murder of six million Jews by the Nazi regime and its collaborations.