There are many benefits that would stem from the building of local dog parks, exercise for your pet and allowing them time to socialize being only a couple of those benefits. Spending more time outdoors with your dog, providing exercise for not only your pet but for yourself as well. The building of a dog park provides your dog with more than enough space for them to run around and be free for a bit. A dog park would benefit a wide range of people, making themselves and their pets happy. However, some of us aren't as excited about the the building of a dog park. This would be paid for by all of us taxpayers, including some who do not even own dogs. A dog park would bring more people; traffic, as well as noise levels, would both increase. Reports of noise near Reston, Virginia and Chandelier, Arizona prove this fact. While it is true the ASPCA says that dogs who do not get adequate amounts of exercise destroy things or often act out, there are other risks to a dog park being …show more content…
That being said, there are still 62% of Americans who aren't looking for a dog park at all. A rough estimate for the fence alone would cost up to $70,000 for the fence alone. All of this money would come from the taxpayers, that would be the same as me trying to get public catnip gardens built soley for the purpose of my cat.
The responisbility of ones pet should be just that; that owners responisibilty. In conclusion, yes, the building of a dog park has many benefit, yet there would be just as many negative effects on the community. I urge you to weigh the ups and downs and use your better judgement when it comes to the matter of building a dog park. A dog park would benefit a dogs overall health, both mental and physical, by providing adequate exercise. However, there is still a chance that an attack could occur. This would be a chance, I myself, as I hope you would as well, would like to
I think dog parks are a good idea. Dogs need alot of exercise and play time. Many cites and urban areas just dont have the room for that to happen. But there are optoins there many open unused lots, and empty building that could be torn down to create these places. I am a dog owner myself i live in the country were open space is abundant. My dog Neno can run a play all he wants it's good for his health and mental state. When he doesn't get out he gets cranky and chews thing around the house. I grew up in a city of five millon, so i know how hepful a dog park can be to dog owners. You should always have your dog around other people, and animals,
To many complications will come from a dog park. Such as situations like a dog attacking another dog or even attacking someone else. This can cause a lot of upset owners. Also many painful court cases. Dog parks will bring up a lot of legal issues that we don't need.
In this large populated area, the on going noise of barking dogs and yelling owners can become a bit annoying. This is essential for those that enjoy the peace and quiet of their community. Therefore, building a dog park in a more isolated area, would be more ideal.
Before you jump to the hasty conclusion that I’m opposed to a dog park because I do not have a dog, let me assure you I do have a dog and am aware of my responsibilities as an owner. The principal argument for a dog park is “exercise is important to dogs’ mental and physical health.” I would take this argument a step further and state exercise is also
I would certainly agree that a dog park is a beneficial addition to a community in which many residents own dogs. The particular benefits that such a public service offers should not, in my opinion, be dismissed.
Dogs should have their own parks,because when dogs aren't getting the physical and mental excercise that they need, their behavior tend to get worse. ASPCA has a study that shows the rate of dogs biting humans went down drastically in places where they're dog parks. ASPCA also believes that if dogs had a park then their would be less incidents of dogs attacking humans,barking, and destroying things. Many dog owners have given their dogs up , because they started to act like''bad dogs'', this is because they don't have a dog park to excercise all their energy everyday. Dogs need a park just like humans.
I believe that a dog park would be an excellent idea for Muscatine, Iowa. Not only would a park benefit the dogs but it would benefit the owners. A dog park would help in raising and caring for the dog. Dogs should be able to play and be free in a space that they will be safe. Not everyone has the space available at their homes. Some people live in apartments that don't have the yard space needed to let the dog run around. Expecially with bigger dogs. They need a lot of room. I can understand why people would be opposed to the idea though. There's always a chance of a dog harming another animal or human. Dogs can carry diseases, fleas, lice, and other harmful things that can be transfered to humans and animals. But if you let yourself
According to one article '' That 37% of americans who own dogs often look for a dog park when choosing for a place to live''. With dog parks everyone would benefit. Without a place to take dogs they may never socialize much and can become aggresive.Though a good point can be made that dog parks can be loud at times. I still believe that dog parks are needed.
We as a comunity have to deside if we can use a dog park. I live in Kalispell Montana and in my case we dont have a dog park. I believe that Kalispell does not need a dog park because of the population. In my exsperince we never needed a dog park we have many parks that you can take your dog to so he/she can run around. When my family and I got my blue nose pit he needed lots of room to rome and play. I took my dog named Spike on long walks, long boarding trips, and
I fully support the idea of building a dog park. As many cities have leash laws which keep the dogs from getting the excersize and socialization they need. When a dog does not get the space and socialization it needs, its behavior can waver. Dogs can become agressive as stated in the passage, "A Dog Park Benefits All". Therefore getting a dog park would keep dog related injuries on the lower end of the spectrum.
I believe most if not all cities should have a public dog park. Since I was nine years old I have always owned a dog. I have lived the city all of my life as well. Living in the city there is many apartment buildings with little to no yard space. To keep a healthy and friendly dog the dog needs exercise and play dates. Because most pet owners in the city have no yard space for these activities. a public dog park is the perfect solution.
Dog parks benifit the community. While some may not see the benifit in building a dog park, it brings several positive affects for dog and none dog owners. Some benifits to having a dog park in the comunity include; safer conditions for the people in this comunity that may be in contact with local dogs, increases in perspective home owners as well as an increase in property demand in area's near dog parks.
Do you have a dog? Do you ever want to bring your dog somewhere they can have safe fun? A dog park is a great place to bring your dogs that is safe, there is many benefits of dog parks. A dog park is a fenced in place for dogs to play, get exercise, and make friends. The community needs one, so there’s a place for owners and dogs can go.
I personally do not think public dog parks should be built in cities. The setting, to begin with, is not ideal. You wouldn’t move into the city with young children and expect to have large yardspace. So, why do dog owners feel entitled to a public park, which the taxpayers have to pay for? This project is not a necessity to spend more than $70,000 on either. And, the excess noise a park would cause could disturb many. Put yourself in the situation of being unable to work or sleep, it wouldn’t be fun.
Many people, including myself, agree with the idea of dog parks. There are so many issues that can and will be fixed with the addition of an extra space for dogs to roam free without fear of being hurt. this topic can be touchy for those who do not own dogs and those who will not support something that does not benefit them. I will explain my arguments in the following paragraphs.