preview

How Is John Proctor Ethical

Decent Essays

The Crucible In “The Crucible”, Arthur Miller uses John Proctor to oppose the moral and ethical implications of the Puritan society. John Proctor goes against the grain and has his own opinions on life, good and bad. Puritans were strong religious people that thought that church should be attend on the sabbath day, that you should be faithful to your spouse, and to always tell the truth and live according the the bible. John Proctor did the exact opposite. Even in todays society people still believe that church should be attended and morally it is expected. Proctor didn't go to church because Parris no longer talked about God.Proctor was looked down on for not going to church and they thought that it was suspicious because it made him look like a ‘witch’. I believe that Proctor wasn't proud of the fact that he didn't …show more content…

Proctor was given the option to confess his life and sign a piece of paper but he couldn't bring himself to lying to being a witch and for them to have his name to be hung on the wall of the church. Proctor could have lied and kept his life but instead of going through with admitting that he was a witch, he decided not to lie. Ironically, when Proctor tries to do the right thing, the other Puritans are trying to persuade him to keep his life by lying. Morally what he did was right by letting them take his life. Puritans didn't understand why John would want to give up his life but he didn't want to give his name up to a bad reputation. This just shows how John Proctor wanted to fix his mistakes. In Act VI, Proctor explains why he doesn't want to give them his name signed to confess, “Because it is my name! Because I cannot have another in my life! Because I lie and sign myself to lies! Because i am not worth the dust of the feet of them that hang! How may I live without my name? I have given you my soul: leave me my name!”

Get Access