How Is David Madando Innocent

Adnan Syed is innocent. I believe this because one, everyone says things that don’t make sense or don’t add up. Two, how could Adnan do this if he cared for Hae as much as he says he does? Three, every time it seems like the blame should fall on Adnan, people doubt that he’s not the one to blame. First, Adnan Syed is innocent in my eyes because all of his witnesses say different things and things that don’t add up. For example, almost all of the witnesses said a lot of “he was probably there”, and “from what I can recall”. Next, Adnan cares and wants the best for Hae, so why would he kill her? Adnan stated that he just wanted her to be happy that’s all he cared about, does that sound like a murder to you? Lastly, there’s too much doubt on

David, the youngest was given away at the age of two. When his new family, the McDaniels took a look at him for the first time, he had a series amount of bed bug bites all over his body. Although he was raised in a very religious enviroment he still would visit his siblings ruth and milton and untie them from the barn everytime he would go back to his home. At the age of sixteen he ran away from his home and joined the military where he was able to move away from transforming into a rebellious teen. Many years after the return of David, he finally had the chance to reunite with his biological mother where he stated that when his mother saw him for a second time she did not show any sign of pitty nor regret she simply just stated “ you look just like your father.”

Mr. Chiu wanted revenge on the police, but he did not have a strategic plan. Once he saw the tea stand, his mind started to form his plot of revenge. Mr. Chiu made his way to numerous restaurants in close proximity to the police station, infecting as many people as possible with hepatitis. His plan of revenge, however, affected the lives of innocent people as well as children, who had nothing to do with the injustices of what had occurred in the police station. Montresor planned his revenge and meticulously put each detail into place. Montresor made sure “there was no one home” for he had “told the servants that they must not leave the palace” (Poe 2). However, he knew that the servants would disobey him and that “they would all leave as soon as my back was turned” (Poe 2). The wall in the wine cellar that was once built was taken down so that Montresor could leave Fortunato to die without the concern of people hearing him. Montresor deliberately caused the death of the one he sought his revenge on. Unlike Mr. Chiu, who with his anger and animosity for the police affected the lives of innocent people rather than the intended victims of his revenge. When Mr. Chiu achieved his revenge and hurt innocent people, he did not have a guilty conscience. In contrast, when Montresor planned and killed Fortunato, his “heart grew sick” and he hurriedly finished closing Fortunato in the wall (Poe 5). Therefore, showing that he had a guilty

Why Pedro Hernandez Is Guilty? “So many false leads, so many blind alleys”. So many years have gone by. Now I know what the face of evil looks like, and he’s finally convicted.” At a news conference after Etan Patz's trial was over, his father told the reporters that he could now know the face of the man who killed his son and that his family could rest knowing Justice was served for their son.

Martí follows the several key trials that he believes provide evidence for the government’s need to accept responsibility for what is done by its citizens. In, “The trial of Guiteau,” the reader learns about Charles J. Guiteau who was convicted in the killing of President Garfield. In this essay, Martí is adamant about ensuring that no one forgives the convicted murderer for his deed. In one sentence Martí states, “He does not arouse pity; he does not arouse forgiveness; he arouses no desire to excuse him” and goes on to say, “There is no place for him in men’s hearts, only in their hatred” (95). Yet, the irony of his statements becomes evident through the sentence immediately following the latter when Martí explains that “Reason demands that his [the convicted murderer] life be spared” because he believes that “killing the monster is inadequate way of ending power’s nature to grow monsters…” (95). Thus, while Martí strongly believes that no forgiveness should be shown to Guiteau, he still believes that Guiteau deserves to live because his execution would not change the reason why it happened. Instead, Martí believes that only the government can prevent what happened by changing what caused it. Moreover, it could be loosely said that he does not believe the Guiteau is responsible for the death of the president; instead he believes that the government under which Guiteau lived is responsible. Ultimately, Martí

Due to these horrific reasons, and the fact that no innocent man should be murdered for non-harmful actions, I find Mr. Montresor guilty.

David's mother got worse and she began to think of new ways to torture David. David was one of a few brothers, but only he was targeted. The other brothers pretended he wasn't even there. There was only one person in the family that still loved David was his father. David’s father would fight for David and would protect him from the mother. But, he would always lose. Whenever David's father went to work, David would get beat. Dave became the scapegoat for his mother's mistakes. David became a slave of the house and did all the chores. If he did not finish his chores with an unreasonable time, he did not receive dinner. David was starved for three days at a time. Once, David got stabbed by his mother for not completing her dishes. Whenever David came back from school his mother forced him to throw up to see if he got any food at school. This happened every

Reginald Rose’s ’12 Angry Men’ brings 12 jurors together in a room to decide whether a young foreign boy is guilty of killing his father. The play is interwoven with dynamic characterisation, striking symbolism and intense moments of drama. Although Rose positions Juror 8 as the hero, the strongest character is in fact Juror 4, who is an independent thinker, rational and calm even as tension begins to build. Although Juror 4 initially votes guilty, he is able to admit his fault and change his vote.

Tsotsi is guilty because he knew what he was going to do and had things planned out already. He knew what he was doing in the first place, Tsotsi stated to his gang member, “The trains he said let's take one on the trains”. (Fugard 4) , Tsotsi´s talking about killing and robbing someone on the train, which shows he planned the attack. Additionally, he decided to harm Boston; Fugard said, ¨He opened his mouth to yawn but instead a cry came out and when that, he bought one of his arms down in a wide…, catching Boston full on the parted lip with his clenched fist¨.(Fugard 26) Tsotsi is guilty because he threaten boston and

Throughout the play of Hamlet, one of Shakespeare's most famous tragedy's the main character, Hamlet is faced with the responsibility of getting vengeance for his father's murder. He decides to pretend madness as part of his plan to get the opportunity to kill Claudius who was the suspected murderer. As the play goes on, his portrayal of a madman becomes believable, and the characters around him respond quite vividly. Through his inner thoughts and the obvious reasons for his actions, it is clear that he is not really mad and is simply an actor faking insanity in order to complete the duty his father assigned him.

Throughout Shakespeare?s play, Hamlet, the main character, young Hamlet, is faced with the responsibility of attaining vengeance for his father?s murder. He decides to feign madness as part of his plan to gain the opportunity to kill Claudius. As the play progresses, his depiction of a madman becomes increasingly believable, and the characters around him react accordingly. However, through his inner thoughts and the apparent reasons for his actions, it is clear that he is not really mad and is simply an actor simulating insanity in order to fulfill his duty to his father.

As a friend of Romeo’s, Mercutio supports the Montague’s in the ancient feud. An example of Mercutio defending the Montague’s is when Tybalt, a member of the loathed Capulet family, abuses Romeo and Mercutio intervenes on Romeo’s behalf. Attempting to restore peace, Romeo gets between the two combatants and Mercutio “hath got his mortal hurt” (Page 149; Act 3, Scene 1) on Romeo’s account. In spite of his “life shall pay the forfeit of peace” (page 17; Act 1, Scene 1), Romeo seeks revenge on Tybalt as he loves his murdered friend. As Romeo kills Tybalt out of love for Mercutio, Shakespeare suggests that love conquered the thought of being penalized with death.

A lot of people wonder if Adnan Syed is guilty or innocent, today as a legal assistant I'm going to tell you one important reason why he is innocent. Adnan is not guilty because there is another potential suspect like Jay. Jay's story that "proves" Adnan's guilt, has changed every interview and testimony. Jay had intimate knowledge of the crime he knew things, like if he knew every single thing that Adnan was thinking about which makes everything looked suspicious. Also Jay's stories don't quite match Adnan's cell records.

At the age of 5 years old, not only did he began to take showers with his father, but when they went to the beach club, his mother bathed him in the shower in the presence of other naked women. By the age of 6 years old, David noticed the power men had over women, “when a male entered the women’s side of the bathhouse, all the women shrieked”. (Gale Biography). At the age of 7 and 8 years old, he experienced a series of head accidents. First, he was hit by a car and suffered head injuries. A few months later he ran into a wall and again suffered head injuries. Then he was hit in the head with a pipe and received a four inch gash in the forehead. Believing his natural mother died while giving birth to him was the source of intense guilt, and anger inside David. His size and appearance did not help matters. He was larger than most kids his age and not particularly attractive, which he was teased by his classmates. His parents were not social people, and David followed in that path, developing a reputation for being a loner. At the age of 14 years old David became very depressed after his adoptive mother Pearl, died from breast cancer. He viewed his mother’s death as a monster plot designed to destroy him. (Gale Biography). He began to fail in school and began an infatuation with petty larceny and pyromania. He sets fires,

“A person is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.” In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, a 19-year-old is on trial for the murder of his father. After many pieces of evidence were presented, the three that are shaky include the height of the father, the woman who saw from the el train, and the old man who saw the boy running down from the stair. Based on these, the boy is not guilty.