How Has Changed The History Of The Music Industry

Family structure does not tie in well with the Babylonians. The Code of Hamuriabi, law number 210: “If the woman die, his daughter shall be put to death,” shows the lack of appeasement by a traditional family structure. There are several laws like this one that basically undermining the women and simply give the man full control of what he owns. in a way this could be viewed as a sexist culture which it clearly proves to be just by the exhibition of its law. Today, laws like those do not directly exist, but there is still a constant undermining of women.

What some people think of courage is doing something without having fear. Others see courage as standing up for something that you believe in. Harper Lee takes both of these definitions and use them in her writing. In the novel To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee uses the children, Boo Radley, and Atticus Finch to demonstrate that courage is more than being brave, but also standing up for what you believe in despite the risk and sacrifice.

Over the last fifteen years, the music industry has been revolutionized by technological improvements. It all began with the creation of the mp3 file format; music suddenly became easy to distribute. Napster took advantage of the new file format by creating a peer to peer network, which composed of the first on-demand streaming company. While their company was riddled with lawsuits, they became the initial leaders for digital music. With iTunes’ release, providing users a digital marketplace, the market began its initial shift. The desire to buy and listen to albums’ in entirety diminished; the industry changed to a singles market. In 2008, Spotify noticed the à la carte downloads that made iTunes quite valuable. Using Napster’s peer to peer model as an initial framework, they created a peer to peer system where they actually paid royalties to the copyright holders. With a freemium service, people could listen to whatever song they wanted as long as they could tolerate intermittent advertisements. Yet what Spotify has managed to do, which no other music streaming company has done, is that they have been able to amass a 40% premium user rate, an astonishing number especially when compared to Pandora’s 5.6% paid user rate. Despite streaming services, particularly Spotify, negative reputation, their entrance into the music industry has not only increased exposure for indie artists, but is also revolutionizing the industry.

Through the iPods influence that lead to the creation of streaming services, it has also impacted how Americans consume music. FM/AM Radio now has competitors like Pandora, a personalized radio. Although Radio is still the most popular way for Americans to listen to music, it’s amount of overall listener are steadily declining over the years. CD sales have also had a fluctuating sales history due to streaming, declining from 12 billion units sold in 2005 to 6 billion in 2014, but then suddenly having a significant increase from 2015 to present. For the first time since 2011, CD and vinyl revenue has topped digital downloads.

President Kennedy signed the Equal Pay Act in 1963, the gap between men and women's earnings has narrowed by less than a half-cent per year. At this rate, American women will have to wait until 2062 to bring home the same salary as their male counterparts” (Speire).

Technology in this digital age has led to drastic changes in many sectors of life, especially needs to technology such as Internet as an information and connection resource. In fact, music has continually evolved at a rapid rate, and the music industry is struggling to keep up the pace. Issues ranging from illegally downloading and sharing of music, piracy to inevitable disputes over sites offering music streaming services and the share of royalties for the artist prompt the big question whether the Internet raises more problems than advantages. The dispute has served as a massive blow

This research looks deeper into the mechanics of how a digital music streaming, namely Spotify, works in the music industry. Spotify is a combination of both non-interactive and interactive service, and it is therefore important to understand how this combination model uses different licensing schemes for each in order to avoid any intellectual property right abuse or copyright infringement. The focus for this paper is more based on the economic model of Spotify, which includes how Spotify can be classified as network good, the licensing schemes that Spotify uses, how royalty payment is determined and the effect Spotify has in combating piracy. The growth of Spotify is also discussed in this paper,

First and foremost, let me mention that I am looking to apply to the Tepper School of Business and the Dietrich College of Social Science and Humanities.

Amidst the hot debate about whether or not music should be free, are ethical and moral considerations as well. The emergence of digital entertainment, whether MP3, peer-to-peer (P2P) applications, video streaming, or audio books, has caused an inevitable shift in the entertainment market (Weiss, 2006). Napster rapidly became a success when it started allowing its customers to download MP3 music free of charge. In fact, Napster’s form of file-sharing shifted the entertainment market from a commodity base to a service base by eliminating cost to the customer. This paper will discuss the major issues in this case study, who the key stakeholders are and how they have changed since Napster’s beginning, what the stakes were for the different

Introduction: Setting the trend for the future, the distribution and consumption of recorded music transformed dramatically with the launching of Apple’s iTunes in 2001. The proliferation of online music subscription services and other music sharing services exerted a great pressure on the conventional music distribution business model. Combined with this transformation, piracy of digital music had a profound impact on the whole industry. These worsening conditions in the market place for recorded music forced both established and upcoming new artists to experiment with new ways of selling their music.

No one can deny that technology is actively changing the music industry. Production, distribution and sales of music have been affected dramatically within the last 10 years along with artists, composers, and technicians. Most of the changes have been great for consumers, but vastly negative for professionals in the music industry, however a few artists have found ways to adapt to the changing atmosphere of digitally downloaded music and use it to their advantage. We’ve seen music change form from physical, tangible products like records and CD’s to electronic single tracks stored in an invisible cloud. Two major factors in this sudden revolution are online music stores (specifically iTunes) and file sharing websites that allow music to be downloaded illegally.

Nowadays, teenagers are living constantly surrounded by technology. Even if the younger generation may not see it, technology has had an impact on different factors. The widespread use of digital technology in the music industry has allowed consumers to reproduce digital versions of copyrighted songs inexpensively, with the help of many software and websites. There has been an increase in digital copying activities and those are most of the time claimed responsible for producers’ loss in revenues. While some people claim that the increase of digital technology has killed the music industry, in fact it has lead to innovation and new ways of consuming and sharing music, such as

The proliferation of the personal computer, the high speed internet connection and the personal listening device have all have a dramatic change on the way that consumers acquire and use music. The inception of digital media and file compression has changed the rules of music acquisition for the artist, the consumer and the retailer alike. For the consumer, the acquisition of music is now mediated by the web, which features a wide range of avenues both free and on a subscription fee basis through which consumers can acquire songs and albums. For the artist and the retailer, this has created a new and pressing demand to find ways of distributing its output while still maintaining profitability. And after a period of steady economic decline, the recording industry has seen a technology-driven shift in hierarchy, with web and computer based firms like Apple leading the charge both in terms of commercial robustness and innovation. Still, as the research conducted hereafter will show, there are yet tremendous gains to be made by new entrants in the field. With a proper emphasis on the types of technological and business processes required to compete in a constantly shifting market, a company such as the Swedish-based Spotify may be in a position to challenge the dominance of Apple's iTunes and related iPod device.

As the billion dollar home entertainment industry, specifically within music, continues to grow and evolve at record rates, there seems to be some clear trends of availability, accessibility, manageability, portability and economic factors playing vital roles in the requirements to remain competitive in the digital music industry.

The music industry’s reinvention, shifted from physical stores to downloads, hence guaranteeing new opportunities for their business (and that of competitors);