Bossypants is a wonderfully hilarious arrangement of short-stories written by none other than the queen of comedy, Tina Fey. She not only talks about her more recent endeavors in her life, but her childhood as well and how it molded her into the creative and hilarious improviser and feminist that we know her as today. Her memoir not only shows off her comedic writing skills, but also her skill of using satire and sarcasm to relate to a normal audience with ease. When talking to a new person or even a famous person, the easiest and most efficient way to bond with them is through humor and other commonalities so that can unify your experiences. Throughout the entire book, Tina relates to her audience through her crazy and comical experiences …show more content…
She tackles the idea of discrimination and gives advice to her audience that she called “Over! Under! Through!” after the old Sesame Street film. Explained, it is to think about whether that person is in between you and your goal, and if they aren’t, then her advice is to leave it alone; if they are in your way, such as your boss, then her advice was to find someone around or above your boss who is not a misogynist, for there is no point arguing about it because it won’t change their opinion. In one of her experiences of sexism, she states her friend, Amy Poehler, and her were doing a rather vulgar skit as a joke and one of their male coworkers complained that it was not their place as women to be doing such things and that it was not attractive, to which Amy responded: “I don’t care if you like it!” Another area of feminism Fey talked about was towards the beginning of the book. She talks about how she never really fit into society’s beauty standards and how she struggled with that in high school and explains how beauty standards are ridiculously high and practically unachievable and emphasizes the importance of being yourself and being
This article discusses the documentary’s focuses of the public hearing of Anita Hill and Clarence Thomas and the feelings behind the facts that were stated during the hearing. The article served to be a promotion regarding the Frontline documentary airing on the PBS channel that day. It addresses the issues of gender and race as the program explains the confrontation between Hill and Thomas in the context of the struggles of both a black woman and man in a white society. The struggles between a black woman and man suggest the gender issues of the day raising awareness towards sexual harassment acts in the work place. The debate invokes the representation in the power structures of race and gender creating a topic of intersectionality. The perspective of both Hill and Thomas are portrayed in the true purpose of the allegation and
Sherrie Wilson “They Forgot Mammy Had A Brain” chapter is one that discusses a variety of pressures that an African American woman may encounter in a work environment. The chapter uses professor, Andra, in a college setting to discuss these pressures from her own experience at a PWI university. In the chapter many pressures were mentioned; double marginalization, designated visibility, racial battle fatigue, and the historical mammy concept, all of which were apart of Andra’s experience.
Spotting the intersecting types of oppression confronted via ladies of shade, she has become a vocal proponent of gender equality and empowerment. Through her art work as a social worker and network organizer, Brown faced gender-based discrimination head-on, advocating for policies that promote women's rights in areas which include healthcare, education, and employment. Her efforts laid the premise for progress closer to an extra equitable and inclusive society, inspiring limitless girls to pursue control roles and impact change in their
She basically says women have grouped themselves amongst other women. White women support the white man and not the black women, eluding to the term gender subordination. If they were to help their gender it will dampen the relationship with the man. Which is something that I saw in the picture of Angela Peoples. White women superficially supporting the black women because they don’t want to lose the benefits the white man has allowed them to have.
get being white. But she spoke very directly on how men privilege was just as bad.
Women and men are born equal. However, females are receiving unequal judgement and unfair treatment in the society, and thus Marilyn Frye brings up the notion of “oppression”, claiming that women are oppressed. Throughout the essay, I will first give the definition of Frye’s oppression and then list 5 critical qualifications to be considered oppressed. After that, I will explain my appreciation on Frye’s perspective on elaborating oppression using the “bird cage” analogy. I will support Frye’s “double-bind” argument for sexism followed by flaws in the argument. Furthermore, I will point out some social group are mistakenly placed inside or outside the parameters of oppression, once the theory of oppression extends over other marginal groups.
Whiteness and racism comes from the oppression, colonization and systems of dominance over black people and their feelings. In this case, an intersectional feminist analysis matters because women who are able bodied, cis-gendered, privileged and white are only being considered whereas bell hooks argue that men, women and trans people who oppressed should be fought for. And Peggy McIntosh adds onto this but a white woman who addresses and recognizes her privilege to help other white individuals understand what they have and blacks do not.
A personal ethos is another factor used in Chisholm speech, to convey women who have been discriminated of their gender. There has been unprecedented prejudice that tends to be ignored from people, since every time we think about prejudice we think about the black community. But that 's not the case, Chisholm confirms with her own personal experience that women, in general, are being prejudices in politics. Chisholm claims that “as a black person, I am no stranger to race prejudice. But the truth is that in the political world I have been far oftener discriminated against because I am a woman than because I am black”(Chisholm, 149). Her history as an African American woman, Congresswoman makes her claim, and for the courage, she took in entering the presidential nomination in the Democratic party in 1972, the speech she has to introduce makes it believable and gives credibility to the reader.
Martinez speaks on the need to change language regarding racial issues to include other races. She states that some argue other races have been excluded in the discussion due to no being “dark enough” and because instead they suffer from exploitation and repression caused by culture and nationality. Hernandez explains that feminism needs to better include minority and low-income women. As of now these women are underrepresented and the issues they face are ignored by those who lead the feminist movement (white middle class women). Collins explains that those who are oppressed need to come together and create change by recognizing each others struggles and not minimizing them instead of fighting for public attention. By not comparing levels of oppression, we actually lessen the oppression caused by the competition. Harris concludes that in order for a younger demographic, specifically, young women, to be involved in politics, social media and other online platforms have to accepted as contribution to
In today’s society, people often tend to shift towards the “societal norms” and don’t ever want to be pushed out of their comfort zone. While many people write about the struggles with these situations, two authors seem to do a great job at explaining it in their own lives. In Amy Poehler’s preface, “Writing is Hard,” and in Tina Fey’s excerpt Bossypants, they both describe what it’s like to live with the difficulties and demands of today’s society with Poehler’s being more from the work side and Fey’s being from the beauty side. While both write about overcoming society’s mindset and believing in yourself in the two perspectives they present, Fey seems to do a more detailed and thought out job with the writing in Chapter three: “All Girls Must Be Everything” that more people can relate to.
While sexism is no longer as overt a practice as in the past, it is arguably just as pervasive. bell hooks’ life as an academic has been spent trying to breakdown the existent sexist barriers, which have prohibited women from achieving equality with men.
I believe that with any sort of discrimination resilience is needed not to blow up, and stay silent. In the story, it was seen that she was forgotten, and neglected. I see this as
She makes another statement affirming her position that female oppression could be related to anything but human constructs that must be destroyed:
She comments on the oppression experienced by woman through three distinct lenses: that of biological differences, that of the psychoanalytical perspective, and finally through the lens of historical materialism.
For centuries and even today, gender inequality and racial prejudice continue to exist. Throughout time these concepts have overlapped and intertwined, each other creating complex interactions and a negative influence upon society. In the 1980s, Kimberle Williams Crenshaw through her article, named Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color, introduced the term “Intersectionality.” Intersectionality, is the theory of how different types of discriminations interact thus, goes hand in hand with Judith Butler, in her article titled “Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory” which expresses the term “gender acts” and helps decipher a probable cause of the many discriminations faced in contemporary society. Since both gender inequality and racial inequality share a common thread, I believe that what intersectionality represents will help understand Judith Butler’s view on gender classification and the dynamic it’s caused on our social and political formation.