preview

How Does The Stanford Prison Experiment Relate To The Milgram Experiment

Good Essays

Human beings desire acceptance in society. As social creatures, it is rather difficult for an individual to restrain from being influenced and being adapted to the environment around them. People will readily conform to the social roles that they are expected to portray in certain environments. The Stanford Prison Experiment and the Milgram Experiment are substantial examples of how much the environment controls individual behavior and how obedient people are to authority, despite their moral beliefs. The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass portrays such examples of how it relates to the experiment. Even though the details of his life as a slave occurred over a hundred years ago, his findings concur with that of the actions taken in …show more content…

The Milgram Experiment distinctly shows how people stray from their moral beliefs as a result of obeying authority figures. During the experiment, the teacher was willing to administer fatally high volts of electricity to the learner despite their will to do so. They were willing to obey the authority figure even at the consequence of injury of the learner. Throughout the Narrative, Frederick Douglass recounts the relationships between slave owners and their mulatto children. Masters deviate from their moral compass, when they are pressured by society to sell their own children. "The master is frequently compelled to sell this class of his slaves... it is often the dictate of humanity to do so" (Douglass 11). The Stanford Prison Experiment reflects the exact behavior of the masters. When mishandling the prisoner, the guards felt as oppressed as the prisoners being oppressed. In the Narrative, Douglass shows slaveholding to be damaging not only to the slaves themselves, but to slave owners as well. The nefarious and impulsive power that slave owners take delight over their slaves, has a deleterious effect on the slave owners’ own moral well being. He recounts how many slave owners committed adultery and rape. Such adultery threatens the unity of the slave owner’s family, as the father is forced to either sell or constantly punish his own …show more content…

The change in environment was inspired by a change in the types of individuals. Frederick Douglass had always assumed that because Northerners didn’t have any slaves, they were poor. But the city’s economy appeared prosperous. There was no extreme poverty. Even the city’s blacks enjoyed good living conditions. They were more politically educated than many Southern slave owners. Additionally, the Northern blacks take care of one another and prevent capture of escaped slaves. Douglass is met with new opportunities such as working for complete wages (Douglass 83). Even when Douglass escapes to freedom in the North, he cannot fully adjust himself. He might be recaptured to the South. He “trusts no man”, since anyone could betray him into slavery (Douglass 86). The environment in the North portrayed a new way of life for Douglass. It allowed Douglass to transition from being totally dependent on his masters, to a completely independent individual (Douglass 82). He specified about the difference between genuine Christianity and corrupt. There is a great gap between the pure, peaceful, and genuine Christianity of Christ and the corrupt Christianity of slaveholding America. Douglass articulates his understanding of the hypocrisy of Southern “Christians” who whip slaves, prostitute female slaves, and steal the wages of working slaves while professing Christian values of humility, purity, and morality.

Get Access