The story A Doll’s House presents different scenes, in which the main character Nora questions her identity, and is confronted to the realization of living under her husband’s identity. These conflicts can be analyzed and explained utilizing psychological and sociological theories. The approach of using these different schools of thought helps to understand the struggles of the main character Nora, in her search of individuality. An important occasion in which Nora questions her personality, and comes to the realization that there needs to be a change in her life is when Krogstad confronts her knowledge of a dirty business she had done in the past with Mr. Krogstad. She forged her father’s signature, in order to obtain access to money he had in the bank. She is worried about what Mr. Krogstad would do to affect her family, as he was warning her that if he …show more content…
Nora contemplates the possibility to be away from her children, and asks the person who raised her, Mrs. Ann Marie, what she thought could happen if a mother is away from her children. Ann Marie answers a comforting statement, that she would be there for Nora’s children, the way she was present to raise Nora. Nora asks Ann Marie this question, as she wanted to go away and prove society that she was capable of living a life without needing a husband. She was looking to be an individual who is not fused to the will of her husband. Furthermore, I could say that her fear is to stay in the subordinate position she has always lived in. She does not realize it, but been dependent and fused to the needs of her family, and forgetting about her own needs could lead to metapathologies, which are “the sickness of the soul” (Maslow, 110). Therefore, Nora needs to find her identity, and the two ways she thinks it could happen are if her husband sees her as an equal, or if she leaves her
When Torvald finds her hairpin stuck in the keyhole of the letter box, Nora tells him it must have been their children trying to get into it, not willing to admit that she had tried to break into his things. Although the truth about her is about to be discovered, Nora wants to preserve the last bits of dignity that she has left, finally worrying about herself before anyone else. This last lie however, leads up to her finally speaking the truth and expressing that she no longer feels that she loves Torvald. Her husband is furious at her, insulting her, and fails to see that every lie that she told was for his sake. Realizing that Torvald can’t see her side of things and will only find fault in what she did, she comes to her decision to leave her family. Nora states that she is not happy and never really was, her marriage to Torvald was as fakes as a doll house according to her. Rather than lie, she is completely honest now and states that she wants to become her own person and learn that which she doesn’t know despite what society might think.
Nora is motivated throughout the story to be according to her "free," however, she does not only want to be free of the loan she is owning to Krogstad, she wants to be free from her father and husband's control. Throughout the story, Nora feels as if she has always been treated like a doll child first by her father and then by her husband and is never given the opportunity to evolve as an individual and become a woman who has the potential to be independent and forceful (Yuehua 83). The perfect example her attempt to fulfill her potential as a woman is when she first borrows the loan from Krogstad by forging her dying father's signature. Although she knows her act is wrong and against the law, she still goes on with a naïve challenge to Krogstad during their encounter about the forged signature
Nora’s need to please her father and later her husband made her lose her true self and it is through the flow of events that she realizes that she needs to go and find her true self
Nora’s character development and maturity begins after Nora has been confronted by Krogstad and Torvald for being a “lying mother.” In
Each time Nora finds herself unable to help herself the problem is easily directly traced back to her husband, her father, and to the overbearing dominance of the male society. She tries to save the life of the man she thinks she loves and in doing so sees how she has become a victim of her own ignorance which has been brought upon her by the men in her life.
Her whole life she has been treated like a princess, and has had everything handed to her. Her father started this lifestyle for her, and this lifestyle continued when she married Torvald, a lawyer with a promising future. Nora defies two things in this story, the law and her family in the search to find herself. She defies the law by forging her father’s signature on a check to help her family, “I can’t get it through my head that the law is fair. A woman hasn’t a right to protect her dying father and save her husband’s life!
However, Nora does eventually realize that she has been treated like a child all her life and has been denied the right to think and act the way she wishes. When Torvald does not immediately offer to help Nora after Krogstad threatens to expose her, Nora realizes that there is a problem. By waiting until after he discovers that his social status will suffer no harm, Torvald reveals his true
After Torvald discovers that Nora has forged her father’s signature in order to take out a loan through Krogstad’s letter, Nora explains how she’s felt all these year in not just their marriage together, but in the relationship with her father as well: “‘When I was at home with papa, he told me his opinion about everything, and so I had the same opinions; and if I differed from him I concealed the fact, because he would not have liked it… And when I came to live with you… I was simply transferred from papa’s hands into yours’” (66). By expressing that because Nora’s father had an opinion and that therefore she had “the same opinions”, but “concealed the fact” if she disagreed with him, exhibits how she is aware that she has had to hide her own opinions because of her societal inferiority towards men. Nora’s whole life has been under the influence of another man, as she puts it: “from papa’s hands into yours”, further exhibiting how she has not been able to have her own thoughts and desires, or even personal identity. In addition, when Torvald claims that he would do anything for Nora, except give up his pride, Nora highlights the struggle women face daily in
Her first instinct is to feel pity for Mrs. Linde’s lack of children or husband, classifying her “utterly alone” state as “terribly sad” and inferior to the life she has with Torvald (Ibsen 8). This all changes, however, once Nora agrees to help Mrs. Linde. By binding herself to a woman instead of a man for the first time, she reaches a further state of awareness. When Mrs. Linde mentions Nora’s “lack of trouble and hardship” and calls her a child, Nora becomes defensive, alluding to her displeasure with her position in society (Ibsen 12). “You’re just like the rest of them,” she claims, “you all think I’m useless when it comes to anything really serious...” (Ibsen 12). The “them” and “you all” in Nora’s pivotal statement refers to the men who have bound Nora to the state of a useless doll in a dollhouse: dependent, incapable, and unenlightened—merely nice to play with and pretty to look at.
On the individual level, both Nora are victims of modernization since both of their happiness and rights are deprived by their husbands and they have to take much more responsibilities under the effect of other’s pursuit of individualism. In the movie named ‘A doll’s house’, Nora’s husband, Torvald reckons Nora as his possession and he has full-control of the family. For example, only the husband can have a key to the mailbox at the door and Nora must obey orders from him. Therefore, it represents that the extreme of individualism is selfishness, where Nora cannot make important decisions instead of Torvald or say anything whatever she desires under his excessive individualism. Furthermore, Torvald’s pursuit of individualism is at an expense
Nora does not at first realize that the rules outside the household apply to her. This is evident in Nora's meeting with Krogstad regarding her borrowed money. In her opinion it was no crime for a woman to do everything possible to save her husband's life. She also believes that her act will be overlooked because of her desperate situation. She fails to see that the law does not take into account the motivation behind her forgery. Marianne Sturman submits that this meeting with Krogstad was her first confrontation with the reality of a "lawful society" and she deals with it by attempting to distract herself with her Christmas decorations (Sturman 16). Thus her first encounter with rules outside of her "doll's house" results in the realization of her naivety and inexperience with the real world due to her subordinate role in society.
After having used Krogstad to get what she needed, yet another issue arose. Krogstad turned on Nora once his position at the bank was on the line, and used her borrowing against her for his own good. “Niles Krogstad is also Mrs. Linde’s former crush, and he tries to redeem himself of his crimes of forgery by raising his children” (Rosefeldt).
Nora gets blackmailed for forging a signature, and for this she gets disowned by her husband. But, when her husband finds that the blackmail will be dropped, and will no longer affect their lives, he tells Nora that everything is okay and they both can presume living like normal. This opens Nora’s eyes fully for the first time, before she had only glimpses of the wrongness in her identity, but now she knew. Nora had been living a false identity, she had been a ‘toy doll’, and at the end of the play she decides to want so much more than to be what others thought she should be. In the end of Act three, Nora states ”I must think things out for myself and try to get clear about them” (Ibsen 199). Nora is now going to decided who she is and what she really believes, she is going to discover her own identity. In an article on women working in World War II, it states, “While patriotism did influence women, ultimately it was the economic incentives that convinced them to work. Once at work, they discovered the nonmaterial benefits of working like... contributing to the public good, and proving themselves in jobs once thought of as only men’s work” (“Rosie Riveter: Women”). Women before World War II were thought of as simply housewifes for the most part, similar to Nora. The circumstances of World War II brought about need for women in the workplace, this started a domino effect of women taking up an identity similar to males the sense that they could now
Here, Nora pulls together the tragic circumstances. She sees that she was never truly happy in the house, just content. Her father kept her as a child would a doll, and Torvald continued this when they were married. They formed her opinions for her, set expectations to which she was supposed to adhere, and wrote a vague script of how she was supposed to act. She was like a puppet, with no thoughts or actions of her own. When she finally realizes the injustice being done to her, she decides to free herself.
Her final goal was so important to her, protecting her family, she knew she had to do whatever was necessary, even if that meant not being true to her husband or society. In the end, she realizes that it was more important to her husband his reputation, than what it had meant to Nora, all she had done for the love of her family, concluding to the raw truth that her husband didn´t really love her: he loved what she represented before society, a loving, faithful wife that compelled to all his expectations. She knew that to love her children, she needed first to understand and love herself, a thought way beyond and ahead of time, for a woman in the late 1800´s.