How Does Machiavelli Use Persuasive Rhetoric

Prompt 1: Machiavelli quite simply has a pessimistic view on humanity. As he mentions in, The Prince, “…it is necessary for anyone who organizes a republic and institutes laws to take for granted that all men are evil and that they always express the sickness of their spirit whenever they have the opportunity..(181-182).” I don't believe that Machiavelli thought that man was completely evil, but rather, they will do as they need to get what they want. He believed that man is quite fickle in nature, and whenever an opportunity in self gain presents itself, that man will take it. Man is weak, selfish, and corruptible. Rousseau on the other hand, didn’t share the less than ideal outlook at man.He said,

The Medicis contradict Machiavelli’s theory, “it’s better to be feared than loved”. While writing to Lorenzo de Medici, Machiavelli states how “a prince is always compelled to injure those who have made him the new ruler”. (Machiavelli 8) Machiavelli expounds the importance of harming those the ruler has conquered—in order to remain as an authoritative figure, penalization towards adherents is compulsory to engender more fear among citizens. When comparing Machiavelli’s idea of creating fear to the Medicis’ methods, both theories differ substantially. For example, Lorenzo de Medici was known for giving food and money towards meager residents of Florence.

Machiavelli’s interpretation of human nature was greatly shaped by his belief in God. In his writings, Machiavelli conceives that humans were given free will by God, and the choices made with such freedom established the innate flaws in humans. Based on that, he attributes the successes and failure of princes to their intrinsic weaknesses, and directs his writing towards those faults. His works are rooted in how personal attributes tend to affect the decisions one makes and focuses on the singular commanding force of power. Fixating on how the prince needs to draw people’s support, Machiavelli emphasizes the importance of doing what is best for the greater good. He proposed that working toward a selfish goal, instead of striving towards a better state, should warrant punishment. Machiavelli is a practical person and always thought of pragmatic ways to approach situations, applying to his notions regarding politics and

Throughout the Age of Exploration, Europeans encountered many different types of people, places, and ideas. Due to their self-righteousness, Europeans’ interactions with foreigners and people with different opinions often went awry. During colonization, this sanctimoniousness was transferred to Americans, leading to the fact that prior to 1754, being “American” meant being extremely zealous, intolerant, and xenophobic. These characteristics are exemplified in Christopher Columbus and Oliver Cromwell, both of whom were influential individuals in the New World.

It is essential prior to judgement on whether Machiavelli is a political amoralist or not to take into account The Discourses and the essence of their meaning. The Prince alone I grant can be mistaken for a how-to-be-a tyrant handbook with it’s absolute theories and some what lack of civility, where “the end justifies the means';. But it’s intention is assuming the political leader is already of moral standing and possess such qualities of integrity and virtue to be expected of one in the position of leadership. “Everybody sees what you appear to be,few feel what you are,and those few will not dare to oppose themselves to the many,who have the majesty of the state to defend them;and in the actions of men,and especially of princes,from which there is no appeal, the end justifies the means'; “Thus it is well to seem merciful,faithful humane,sincere,religious and also to be so.'; Effectively what seems as ruling with an iron fist is best expressed in terms of need. The 16th Century political unrest Machiavelli is influenced by would best be unified by such absolute power due to it’s degradation and lack of structure. So therefore it would not be seen as immoral with respect to it’s time. And looking at it from a wider more advanced perspective although the technique may appear rigid if it creates the desired unification

Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince examines the nature of power and his views of power are still somewhat in existence today. I'll discuss this in this essay, emphasizing the following theses. Machiavelli discusses power over the people, dictatorial power, and power with people, shared power. While it is possible for power with to attain greater prevalence in society, it will not completely eliminate power over. In The Prince, Machiavelli discusses two distinct groups of people, the political elite, including nobles and other princes, and the general public. Today in the United States, the first group, the political elite, includes political leaders, religious leaders, business leaders and the leaders of

When examining Machiavelli political ideals, it is hard to look at it without saying this is cruel and not ideal in any sense. Machiavelli is a prime example for a strong leader that pursues justice through unification and has shown to be very open-minded. Justice doesn’t just come through cruelty and strength, it also requires intelligence with careful studies. As exhibited in the prior quote, he takes in historical mistakes and success to shape his ideal. To have a culture with justice, Machiavelli pushes that “It is necessary for a prince who wish to maintain his position to learn how not to be good, and to use this knowledge or not to use it accordingly” (224). It is quite evident that Machiavelli is willing to use the full extent of his power without fear. Through his willingness and open-mindedness, he examines both side, good and the bad, for the benefit of his country. He believes only those that can utilize both knowledge is fit for the position of being a prince. When he says knowledge, it goes deep into the studies of history and past experiences. It is shown time and time again throughout his

A family of monarchy which tortured Machiavelli for months causing him great suffrage and sorrow. He writes to Lorenzo “May I trust, therefore, that Your Highness will accept this little gift in the spirit in which it is offered: and if Your Highness will deign to peruse it, you will recognize in it my ardent desire that you may attain to that grandeur which fortune and your own merits presage for you.” This enough is confusing because if this is the same principality that caused so much suffering why dedicate a book to let their reign continue into longevity? As to add to this confusion, Machiavelli explains how a prince should use cruelty and violence correctly against the people. To use cruelty and punishment all at once so that the people learn to respect you by fear. He includes that if you had a choice on either being loved or feared, be feared for love can change as quick as it came. Fear of punishment, people would avoid and be subservient. He also goes on to put out that a prince must be cunning like a fox yet strong and fearsome like a lion. To use Realpolitik, morality and ideology left out for the world is not these things as you should not be as well. Furthermore, Machiavelli explains what must happen when a new ruler overtakes a new city and the people in it. “And whoever becomes the ruler of a free city and does not destroy it, can expect to be destroyed by it,

Machiavelli uses a compound-complex sentence to inform those who want to be a leader the need of malevolent. Machiavelli uses an independent and dependent clause to gain attention from audience with the purpose of clearing his idea. For Machiavelli’s long sentences in the end of the first paragraph, the prince “profession of virtue” will get “destroyed” by other evil. This cause and effect sentence help the audience to have an images of the impossible of a perfect pure personality of a leader. He warn those who want to be a leader that the prince should be wise and knowing when to act evil rather than good. Moreover, he lists good and bad adjectives such as “cruel” and “compassionate” to imply that a good ruler need to be both moral and immoral. .After all the conventional moral advice, he convey to the prince that action that appear good will damage his position, prince’s power, while those that depict as bad will enhance it.

Persuasive is one of the most manipulative devices used in history and modern time. In the play “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare, there are several characters that influenced the play. Julius Caesar was one of the most influential people in history and made Rome one of the wealthiest cities. The conspirators such as Brutus killed Caesar but they all had their own reasons. Some had reasonable reasons meanwhile others were for their own benefits. At the end of the scene, Mark Antony promised to avenge Caesar's death. One of the most influential characters is Mark Antony, the right hand of Julius Caesar. The significant scene is Mark Antony’s funeral speech. His speech changes the perspectives of how the people of Rome, seen the conspirators. In his speech, we can see that he uses specific evidence, verbal irony, appeals to self-interest, props, and suspense. He uses these persuasive devices to turn the mob against the conspirators.

Author’s Purpose and Intended Audience: While Machiavelli 's writings can appeal to a wide international audience, Italian political and military leaders were his intended audience, especially those in turbulent city states. Although many of his concepts touch on lower level politics and tactical level operations, a majority of ideas are better suited for

Two years ago at Busch Gardens, my Mom and Dad convinced me to go on a roller coaster called the Griffin. I was only ten. My whole body was very nervous, and my fingers were fidgeting. As I flopped in the first row, I pulled the v-shaped plastic harness over my head. I clicked the seat belt and tightened it. We started riding up I could hear the clicking of the roller coaster: click click click click click click. When we reached the top, I was going crazy. I thought I was going to die. We started to advance down, then suddenly stopped. We were dangling off for 3 seconds,hanging over the side 60 feet up but it felt analogous to 30 seconds. Then we started to advance down It was really fast and I couldn't see; we went upside down and sideways.

In the past ten years the world population exceeded six billion people with most of the growth occurring in the poorest, least developed countries in the world. The rapidly increasing population and the quickly declining amount of land are relative and the rate at which hunger is increasing rises with each passing year. We cannot afford to continue to expand our world population at such an alarming rate, for already we are suffering the consequences. Hunger has been a problem for our world for thousands of years. But now that we have the technology and knowledge to stamp it out, time is running short.

Fletcher’s history began in 1909 with the construction of a timber weatherboard house in Dunedin, New Zealand. Fletcher ruled in New Zealand constructing market from 92 years, until in 2001 it was listed as Fletcher Building Limited on the New Zealand Stock Exchange. Its head office is located in Penrose, Auckland. Fletcher’s employed 18800 people globally. It has good success rate and good turnover. The company operates six divisions Heavy Building Products, Light Building Products, Laminates & Panels, New Zealand Distribution, Distribution Australia and Construction. They used old technology and there workers are working for them from years and they looking for good future and good money after their retirement. They need to expand their business over the many other countries like their future plan is to expand their business in Asia and Europe.

Relying on the needs of the society of that time, Machiavelli comes to the conclusion that the most important task is the formation of a single Italian state (Machiavelli 15). Developing his thoughts, the author comes to the following inference: only a prince can become a leader capable of leading people and building a unified state. It is not a concrete historical personality but someone abstract, symbolic, possessing such qualities that in the aggregate are inaccessible to any living ruler. That is why Machiavelli devotes most of his research to the issue of what qualities should the prince possess to fulfill the historical task of developing a new state. The written work is constructed strictly logically and objectively. Even though the image of an ideal prince is abstract, Machiavelli argues that he should be ruthless, deceiving, and selfish.