Annie Proulx illustrates the tormentous and dejected life of Quoyle by reason of his physical aspect. She uses harsh diction, cause and effect syntax, gloomy imagery and despairing figurative language to present the psychological aspect of this hopeless character as the outcome for his family’s treatment.
Firstly, Proulx describes Quoyle as a man without ambition that was constantly hurt by his family. Quoyle’s father always consider his son a failure, he all the time says, “failure to speak clearly; failure to sit up straight, failure to get up in the morning . . .” (line 24), a failure for everything. This alliteration and characterization shows Quoyle’s defects. By using harsh diction, she shows his pathetic personality through the eyes of Quoyle’s father. Her selection of words like “failure”, “damp” and “monstrous” are very stern and rough to depict Quoyle’s nature. Proulx applies harsh diction to clarify Quoyle’s hopelessness and emptiness as the result from his father’s cruel behaviour toward him.
…show more content…
She is very illustrative and severe in her characterization. She states metaphorically how is his physical aspect, in one part she says: “some anomalous gene had fired up at the moment of his begetting as a single spark sometimes leaps from banked coils, had given him a giant’s chin”, in this sentence, she uses a cause and effect syntax to characterize his physical defects. This type of syntax causes a better understanding of his nature; an afflictive person that most of the time does not do anything to change. She describes how ugly he is and provokes an unpleasant perception of this character with the purpose to reveal the effects of a disturbed
The first passage reveals the parallel suffering occurring in the lives of different members of the family, which emphasizes the echoes between the sufferings of the father and the narrator. The narrator’s father’s despair over having watched
Her crude choppy handwriting gives the feeling "that she had been the victim of some inner- some emotional- conflict that had in its violence broken the continuity of the lines she was able to make on paper"(81). Her writing directly reflects the incontinuity and lack of control in her life. Unlike Bateman who feigns control over his life through body building and bulimia, she escapes from the lack of control in her life through depression.
How has the character changed over the course of the book and what role has external influences played in these changes? How has this character maintained their sense of self while these changes are occurring?
Initially cautious yet intrigued by Wavey’s quiet strength and kindness, Quoyle’s gradual opening up to her portrays his ability to forge connections despite past traumas. Proulx crafts their interactions with sensitivity, emphasizing Quoyle’s resilience and growth as he learns to trust Wavey. This portrayal emphasizes the transformative power of human connection in overcoming personal challenges and finding comfort. Furthermore, Quoyle’s observation of Wavey’s independence,“She lived alone, and seemed to like it”(Proulx 127), highlights her self-reliance, mirroring Quoyle’s journey towards self-discovery, addressing the theme and characterization aspects of the literary devices. This parallel emphasizes the mutual support and understanding between Quoyle and Wavey, as they navigate their respective paths towards healing and renewal.
life of a young, hopeless boy. Through the authors’ use of diction, personification, and the
As for characterization, the author used it indirectly. There were very sparse moments where you had a direct description of a character. You could find out things about the characters mostly through their dialogue and actions. Pudge was the only exception where you found things out through his thoughts, because he was the narrator. There was one instance, however,
4. Give an example of characterization. How does the author convey to you who this character is, what they do, what they are about, etc.? (Your answer should be at least 50 words
Once back in Glome, Orual relates Psyche’s fantastic tale to the two people that she trusts the most, aside from Psyche, Bardia -- her wise and religious bodyguard -- and The Fox -- her teacher and father-figure. Both of them, due to their vastly differing beliefs, give Orual different responses to Psyche’s story, though both agree on one point: the husband is malevolent and is either the divinely frightening Shadowbrute or an undesirable who lives in the mountains. Based off of these two interpretations of the situation, as well as her own doubtfulness about the nature of Psyche’s husband, Orual resolves that she has an obligation to show Psyche the reality of her dreadful situation. In doing so, Orual believes that, although she would initially cause her sister pain, her actions would better Psyche’s life in time. In other words, the drastic measures Orual takes are driven by both, her immense love and devotion for Psyche as well as Orual’s desire for Psyche to have the best life possible. Reading this, the reader becomes aware that the seemingly selfish acts that Orual commits, twisted as they may be, are founded in altruism. At this epiphany, the reader’s contempt for Orual melts away and is replaced by a warm sympathy and understanding for why she did what she did to
Response: This is important to the development of the story because it gives us descriptions as to what he looks like, so we can better visualize the character as the plot progresses. It also describes a little bit of what his father looks like and what his dead mother used to look like.
• What are the characters’ emotions, attitudes, and behaviors? What do these indicate to the reader about the character?
Before I started reading the book, I had kind of a negative view of what the main character would. Since we can see that the book is of the horror category before we even start reading it, it gives the illusion that the main character is probably a lost soul looking for a way to redeem himself. In our culture there are alot of factors that play into us stereotyping another human being, we normally see the flaws that others have tagged them with.
The woman on the other side of the bed is a direct representation of Franny. The role the woman plays is like an alter ego projection. The patient in the bed next to Franny’s is very beautiful and looked identical to Franny because she had no hair, she was skinny and had very pale skin. Franny can relate to this nonexistent figure because they are going through the same things, the alternate version of Franny keeps her alive and they are equally alike IN>>>>>.
Secondly, he embodies the best and worst of mankind. He is a scholar and would be considered a Renaissance man. Earlier in his life, he helped his father, who was a doctor, treat sick people during a plague. On the other hand, his lust for Margarete displays the worst of mankind. This
This paper will attempt to answer: How do the operations of repression inform the work? What unconscious motives are operating in the main character(s)? What core issues are thereby illustrated? How do these core issues structure or inform the piece? Are there any family dynamics, including oedipal or Electra dynamics, at work in the piece? Is it possible to relate a character's patterns of adult behavior to early experiences in the family as represented in the story? How do these patterns of behavior and family dynamics operate and what do they reveal?
She is lean, tall, and often goes to church. She regularly wears clothing that do not match her social class as she is often trying to manipulate other people in order to gain an upper hand in most situations. Despite her pretty looks, she often acts irrationally, but recently, she has been seen portraying a more responsible role.