preview

How Does Achebe Characterize Imperialism

Better Essays

“And this also,'' said Marlow suddenly, ``has been one of the dark places of the Earth.'' (Conrad) Are the first words spoken allowed by Marlow in Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness. Marlow goes on the say that he was thinking about the Roman conquers who came to England 1900 years ago. This comparison that Marlow divulges into in the beginnings of his story frames this story and what it intends to cover in its subject matter. Marlow begins here his only overt characterization of imperialism. He puts Rome in the position of the civilized and the native islanders in the position of the savage and what truly distinguishes one from another is not any level of civility but power. Marlow claims that “It was just robbery with violence, aggravated …show more content…

Achebe levels accusations towards Heart of Darkness: the work seeks to justify or somehow redeem European imperialism, otherises Africans to foil and idealize westerners, Joseph Conrad, himself, and was a “thoroughgoing racist.” Finally, Achebe questions its prevalence in American universities. Why Achebe thinks Conrad’s work is racist and has any goals of justifying imperialism lies in his over simplification of the text and Marlow’s voice as narrator. It is most present when Achebe claims Conrad chose a narrator who is not be at odds with the audience. Achebe Claims, “He chose the role of purveyor of comforting myths.” This is possibly the epicenter of Achebe’s misunderstanding, because everything about Marlow is quite unsettling to the audience. Marlow is perpetually discontented by the absurdities that he lives under, and his narrative voice does everything within its power to take to task the “comforting myths” of his audience. If one were to miss this however, it may be easy to see how the work could be miss-characterized. For example, Marlow precedes north along the coast of Africa where he comes upon a French Man-Of-War that seems to be firing aimlessly into the jungle while her own men die of sickness at a rate of three a day. If someone were to read this as a comforting myth in support of imperial policies they will be quite confused. Interpreting this as intending to show the futility and …show more content…

Orientalism is a literary concept of Western authority over the Eastern first put forth by Edward Said. It refers to the studies, research, and literature which describe, to some extent, the culture in the territories of the Middle and Eastern world. Specifically, oriental writers – the subject of Orientalist Critique – do not describe the east, or in this case the Congo, in good faith meaning they either knowingly misrepresent the orient or they depict it in reference to the west in order to instantiate the west as superior or both. To claim that in Heart of Darkness the reader is witness to a “factual” account culture and practices of the native Congolese people would be categorically false on all accounts. This sentiment, however, is an instance of a logical fallacy named “the straw-man.” A straw man gives the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not advanced by that opponent. Heart of Darkness, at no point, claims to be an anthropological study of the various peoples of the Congo nor does Conrad believe himself engaging in such. He does not refer to the river nor the setting by the name Congo either. For all intents and purposes the story has a fictional setting just as it has a fictional narrator. *reference azimi’s critique of Marlow’s

Get Access