preview

How Did The Lincoln-Douglas Debate

Better Essays

The Lincoln-Douglas debates have been regarded as an event that led the discussion involving state rights as well as slavery. It ultimately defined the way politics in America functioned and the role the people played in it. Both Lincoln and Douglas were running for a U.S. Senate position for Illinois. Their rivalry runs deep from from their initial debate revolving the repeal of the Missouri compromise in 1854 to even both of them being attracted to Mary Todd. Nonetheless, the instability behind the divide in the democratic party for Douglas and republicans lending their support to Douglas instead of Lincoln, led to a critical moment that would shape political direction of the United States. Lincoln outperformed Douglas through overcoming Douglas’s mudslinging, public perception, and …show more content…

The factor accounting for the much better performance of Lincoln in the debates rather than Douglas, was the severity of mudslinging brought upon Lincoln. A plethora of opportunities had arisen that led Lincoln on the defense of his beliefs by said attempts to defame him by Douglas. For instance, in a letter from Lincoln to Washburne, Lincoln writes about accusations from Douglas saying he is in league with Washburne, who does not support anymore admissions of slave states. Lincoln offered a proposition for Washburne to burn the letter without answering and if it was false to write him a reply to make it public. He never ended up getting a reply, meaning it might have been true. Although it hints at Washburne supporting this view, Lincoln did not know of Washburne’s view on the issue. The action of inquiry on party of Lincoln’s letter, justifies the situation of conflict of interest between Lincoln and Washburne predisposed on him via Douglas. Douglas attempted to produce Lincoln’s stance on slavery via his support of another politician. Douglas tried contradict Lincoln’s siding with slavery

Get Access