In corresponding with the advances of technology, the French industries took the initiative before the Great War broke out, Germany too took the initiative increasing their productivity; although, the Germans was more comprehensive in planning initial attack with neighboring country than that of the French. In the minds of many strategist, politician, economists, and military critics thought that the Great War would end within the month of the outbreak, but in both ends, supplies were short and production was needed for a speedy mobilization. Thus, the other Triple Entente, Britain, was looking at France for its factories to produce many supplies that fell short such as ….. pg 94. After Germany took a vast amount of France steel production facilities, the French government was hesitant in send some of their military arsenal to the front protecting while the majority supplies and facilities was placed on the rear. When the trench strategy ensued, the French’s facilities …show more content…
Before the Great War, Germany was spending over 19,495,762 Marks on textiles for preparation. The Central Power spend more on than 21,824,729 Marks on textile in comparison to the 1912 expenditure even though the textile price was cheaper in 1918, thus the Central Axis was paying for overpriced textile since the demand was high but the production was low.
Furthermore, Australia was one of many resourceful countries for Germany; Australia exported their high-grade Zinc ore for the Metallurgical production. Australia stayed constant in the production of rubber, cotton, tin plates, shipbuilding, and glucose in the effort to feed its troops and supply them with necessary products. (7pdf) Because Australia lacked on certain aspect of resources does not warrant ignoring Australia involvement with Germany’s struggle; they both were fighting two fronts during the Great War, one on the east, Russia, the other on the west, Great
A less powerful sway on the American decision to declare war on Germany was U.S. economic interests. The development that occurred from WWI was one of the greatest economic booms in the nation’s history. Because of the status of neutrality, the U.S. had the right to continue trade with belligerent countries, and since there was a need for its general use, metal was the most profitable trade with nations at war. Not only did this benefit the recipient’s economy, but the U.S. economy benefitted greatly from it as well. When the War Industries Board instigated the immediate production ammunition and armor, businesses in industry welcomed the guaranteed business and carried out the request. Trade between the U.S. and Germany diminished to 90% because of extensive, supreme blockade of German ports. The supplies sent on ships such as the Lusitania were considered contraband which was illegal to trade to these countries in Europe at the time. This led not only
World War Two saw many successful battles for Australia. In 1942, Australia’s foreign policy was changed so that Australian soldiers were only sent between the 110th and 159th meridians (Britannica, 2015). This restricted them to only battles against the Japanese, fighting for their nation’s wellbeing. These battles played a huge role in the destruction of the Japanese forces. Australia played a secondary role in the battle of Kokoda Trail, after America (Britannica, 2015). Conflicts such as this impacted Australia’s national identity
The closing days of the 1920’s were a start of what would be the worst economic disaster that had ever been witnessed. The effect that the Great Depression had on capitalist countries such as Germany and the United States, was that their stocks and shares heavy economy plunged, leaving businesses unable to trade, and poverty throughout the nation. In the case of France, the depression initially did not suddenly bring the economy down drastically as it had to the more industrialised nations. Although relatively unscathed at first, by 1931 the ripple effect had hit France which steamrolled the economic downturn of the French economy. With France following the gold standard, the economic downturn lasted much longer than other affected
Australian industries such as steel-making and pharmaceuticals suddenly found themselves filling roles that were previously done by German rivals. Australian government was keen to make sure that Australian wheat, wool and meat reached Britain and helped the war effort there. The government was keen to make sure that the Australian wheat wool and meat industries made it over to britain to help out with the war efforts. So a law was made giving it the power to acquire the whole wheat and wool harvests which had seen to be an impossible action under the Constitution, but were then allowed to be done because of the new law. However, shortages at war and selling scarce goods at a very high price meant that many ordinary working people suffered because of a rise in price and a massive drop in their standard of living. After the war 400 new products were being sold that previously had been needed to import from enemy countries. This meant that there was a major fall in the major cities. At the end of the war the Commonwealth had numerous
Compared to earlier times the composition and direction of Australia’s major imports and exports contrasts majorly with Australia’s contemporary trade. In the 1900 Australia’s primary trading partners were European countries
On July 14, 1789 a mob of craftsmen, salesmen, and rebellious soldiers stormed the Bastille (state prison) to get powder and shot for their muskets. When the guards defending the prison resisted a battle ensued and the Bastille was eventually captured. This marked the beginning of the bloody French Revolution. The revolution in France was based on three principles, liberty, equality, and fraternity. These ideals radically changed European politics and brought about the idea of nationalism, which enabled the creation of the “people’s army” in France. The notion of national fraternity was a very powerful and paved the way for a renovation in how military affairs. How and why did the French Revolution factor in military change? The military
Australia was not one of the main countries involved in WW1, however one cannot say they did not contribute largely. From The Western front to The Middle East, Australian troops fought bravely on what appeared to be “The war to end all wars”. Of course one would say that Gallipoli was the most known campaign but it was in The Western Front where the Australian troops fought it what was regarded to be the most important theatre of war.
In Australia, from 1930’s onwards, Australia faced many dangers associated with the war. Before WWII, Australia faced economic threats, from the Great Depression, as well as threats from other countries, with the rise of Germany. At the commencement of WWII, Australia began to feel the threat of Japan. Australia battled these threats with a sense of national pride and prominent individuals who greatly assisted during the war.
It is well recognised that World War 1 was a traumatic experience for the Australian nation. It claimed 60,000 young lives and another 156,000 men were wounded, gassed, or taken prisoner. But when the trauma abated, it became apparent that Australian society had been changed permanently and positively. Some of the gains realised by Australia as a result of her involvement in WWI included a newfound maturity as a nation, the respect and recognition of other nations, new opportunities for trade and industry, a greater recognition of women’s rights and a massive economic and population boost due to post war immigration programs. This web-site has been created to show you some of the benefits of World War One on Australia.
According to the study of Savada (1995) mentioned that there are 3 main reasons causing France to colonize Laos which are France had a competition with England to imperial countries in Asia, the French had changed and developed to be a path of trade in order to transport goods to China and countries in Indochina such as Vietnam and Cambodia, and lastly, Laos is an abundance of natural resources country fulfilling with precious stones such as gold, and tin; in addition, forest resources such as timbers. Therefore, Laos have been seen as an underdeveloped small country and easy to conquer and it was seen to be take advantages rather than developed by
At the beginning of World War II, France’s economy was similar to many other European countries also making efforts to recover and grow from the devastation of the First World War. However, one difference for France was the type of military strategy the government choose to invest in for the future. In the 1930s, the French administration invested huge sums of money into the defense budget. French leadership granted 3 billion francs for the construction of the Maginot Line. This was a significant amount of funding at the time and some experts estimate the actual cost after construction climbed to well over 7 billion francs. The construction effort was extensive and the design was intended to be sustainable in combat for long periods of
The decision to enter into war is usually a great struggle involving many factors. Some countries, however, such as France in 1940, do not have much choice in the matter. France’s leaders struggled with the feelings of autonomy and responsibility. France's struggle entering into World War II was in the difficulty in fulfilling its dual responsibility to the people of France and to the rest of the world whom both maintained conflicting beliefs about the approaching war. The French people desired peace, while the other countries required France to go to war to defend itself against
Just about any country that one can name has some history of civil unrest, class issues, rioting in the streets, and outright warfare. These patterns of behavior are common denominators for most civilization in the world. The names, faces, and places may change, but the motivations are generally the same, because of the need for change and the willingness to do whatever is necessary to achieve it. In contrast to the United States, which was in the process of freeing itself from British colonial rule, France was working to free itself from royal absolutism. This period is historically known as the French Revolution. Many scholars do not agree on the chronology of the French Revolution; some scholars suggest that the Revolution took place between 1789 to 1799 while others feel that it did not end until Napoleon lost power in 1815. To better understand the history of the French Revolution it is necessary to discuss the causes, major events, significant figures, and the outcomes associated with these political developments. Without this uprising, that changed the face of the entire country and influenced local political life in many countries in Europe, in all likelihood the France we know today would never have existed.
Military might was a fundamental aspect of French grandeur. It contributed to national prosperity, as the “military-industrial complex allowed France to become the world’s third-ranking arms exporter.”1 Military applications of nuclear technology were justified by security concerns—primarily a mistrust of the USA’s reliability alongside the desire to be militarily self-sufficient, as a French ambfassador to Canberra remarked that its nuclear program was “divorced from any empty considerations of prestige, and inspired by the purely defensive concern of deterring any possible aggressor.”2 It was cultural significance for France, however, simply cannot be denied, as military prowess in the second-half of the 20th century fused
During WWII there were many advancements in modern weaponry, the production of larger weapons and faster planes allowed for devastation across the globe. Many of these weapons were very effective and while the war trudged on as did the new technology that arose from the hellish time. German forces, at this time, were on the frontlines in trenches as they tried to push back British and French troops. Although Germany’s armies were strong they still struggled to advance on the British and French troops. Meanwhile in Germany, the dye industry was steadily producing economic growth but, the German army had other plans.These plans would eventually change the dynamic of war itself.