How Dangerous Were The Mongols Essay

Throughout the Mongol’s many conquests, it is obvious the great amount of destruction and violence taken upon on these. As explained

How Barbaric Were the “Barbarians?” The Mongolians created the largest land connected empire in the history of the world. Although their methods of doing this were quite brutal, the Mongols were not as barbaric as they are often remembered. Many historians only take into account the destruction caused by the Mongolian empire and completely disregard the improvements the Mongolians made. They had a neatly organized army and places they conquered often saw increased economic development and cultural diversity.

Have you ever heard of the Mongols or wondered what they did or caused? I believe that the Mongols caused greater destruction in the world. There are multiple records of the Mongols that suggest they were a very destructive tribe. An example is that there are documents and articles that show they are barbaric, a quote from a document was “the Mongols proceed to murder almost cutting them down like grass”.

Nothing was safe within the Mongols reach if they got in their way of taking a place over there would kill if children, women priests and monks all were killed because they got in the way of the Mongols wrath. Mongols would stay outside of the walls of the city that they were trying to take over and not let shipments of supply come in and slowly let them die on their own by starvation or they would be too weak to fight back. My last reason that the Mongols made more cultural destruction rather than the other way around is in document 5 and 1. In document 5, it is a pedicure and it shows the Mongols burying people alive. How I know this is it shows the feet moving and them struggling to get out of the dirt.

They were ruthless and gory. The people of Nishapur, a city in Persia felt the raft of the Mongols. History shows that, “The Mongols now descended from the walls and began to slay and plunder… They then drove all the survivors, men and women, out onto the plain; and … it was commanded that the town should be laid waste … not even cats and dogs should be left alive”(Doc 4). This is where their barbaric qualities really begin to show. They killed all of the people in Nishapur. They did not want one single living, breathing thing to be alive. The Mongols had very strict army rules. History shows that, “... Two or three or even more out of a group of ten run away, all are put to death; and if a whole group of ten flees, the rest of the group of a hundred are all put to death, if they do not flee too”(Doc 2). In the Mongols’ eyes, the army was supposed to be one. They wanted everyone in a group to fight at the same time. If they did not get their way the group was executed. Even if one whole group of ten flees, ninety others are killed for no reason. They did not have any associations with the fleeing otherwise they would have left too. Many innocent lives were taken by the Mongols. Now one could say they were just trying to survive, however they took innocent people’s lives. Innocent people do not stand in the way of survival. They were gory and cold people. They were very barbaric with their rules and

It would be preposterous to say that the Mongolian Empire was irrelevant in history. The Mongols, led by Genghis Khan, had put a massive imprint on the way the world is today. However, the rule of the power had created more chaos than harmony. The Mongolians of the Asian Steppe had a negative impact on the world during their rule of the Asian continent from 1260 to 1368 by slaughtering millions of lives, destroying complete cultures in their way for land and spreading a deadly disease to the world.

My first reason for the Mongol Empire being culturally destructive is the conquerings that took place during the years 600 BCE- 1945. My second and third reasons are how unfair the captains of armies would be to soldiers, and that the codes of conduct were mostly in honor of men.

The Mongols are usually perceived as barbaric, uncivilized, and dangerous. And in a way, they were. The Mongols were a relatively civilized group of nomadic people who traveled from place to place conquering as much as possible, as quickly as possible. Their impact on the world has been heavily debated throughout history, and most would agree that they did have a significant role in history. The question remains; is that role positive, or negative?

The Mongols undeniably killed millions of people in their conquest of foreign lands: historians debate exactly how many, but there is no doubt that the Mongol invasion was a tragedy of epic proportions for those in their path. However, when we look beyond the initial conquest, we need to ask, “what were the long-term effects of the Mongol empire”? When we do, we see a lot of positive effects that left the lands they occupied permanently changed, and in many ways for the better.

In the 13th century BC, the Mongols rose to power and conquered an empire whose size still has yet to matched. The Mongols conquered lands such as China, leaving such a lasting influence on them that their legacy still lives on. However, despite the Mongols success, their actions have left a constantly ongoing debate on whether they were barbarians, seen and portrayed by different societies of their time as people with no morale or modern civilities, or civilized people who were just feared by other societies. Although the Mongols are generally now seen as Barbarians because of their violent and barbaric war tactics they used to instill fear in people, they are actually civilized because they had a strategically organized army, and

This tactic wouldn’t seem barbaric if the Mongols hadn’t killed every last man, woman, and child. Anybody they thought weren't worth taking were slaughtered; with the exception of a few people they

Long ago, during the dark days of mankind, rulers rose up and formed empires based on personal desires and their conquest of the nations around them. Like everything in the world they eventually came to an end, but one of the most spectacularly to exist where the Mongol Empire. The Mongols themselves were known as a nomadic group who lived in the vast open grasslands of Eurasia and fierce warriors known for their battles skills and ability to survive. The Mongols, founding of the empire, and Genghis Khan's early days and his reason for creating the empire are well known throughout history. Like all other empires, the Mongols left lasting impacts on the world and proved their historical significance though whether it’s good or bad depends

The Mongols used tactics to destroy, conquer, and slaughter entire towns. The Mongols were so brutal

Throughout the 13th century world, the Mongols constantly showed displays of continuous violence, drinking, brutality and unfair treatment. They were considered to be savages, and people who lived far beyond what we would know as a “civilized world.” They single handedly became one of, if not the most powerful empires to have existed, building their empire through violent and barbaric manors. The Mongols were very barbaric people, for they portrayed many inhumane and mannerless actions while their empire lasted, causing death destruction and the downfall of all of the land they took over.

Notorious for their barbaric manners and their brutal tactics of invading and plundering, the Mongols are commonly associated with a strictly negative reputation and despised for it. Although this negative image remains associated with their history, with hindsight, historians have been able to shed light on a positive perspective of the Mongols and their success creating the largest Empire in world history. This paper will argue that although they were regarded as violent, invading strangers and initially given few rights, their image in history has changed because the Mongols were not simply a destructive people; despite lack of historical evidence and documentation, historians have found they had many positive influences on Asia. Under Mongol rule there was an improvement of status for many peoples, religious tolerance, and an increase in the trade of products, culture, and knowledge.