There is a hero and a villain in almost every fiction piece. A protagonist and an antagonist. Each with their own set of unique characteristics that make them exceedingly different, yet they have to be somewhat alike to make the story engaging. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes and John Clay are perfect examples of this. Although they are vastly different characters one can not miss the obvious similarities between the pair. Holmes and Clay are both extremely intelligent, the best at what they do, and obtain alternating personalities. In “The Red-Headed League”, Sherlock Holmes is an unforgettable character and detective with many remarkable traits that help define him. One of these traits is his abnormal intelligence level which is shown multiple times throughout the short story. Some examples include his collection of observations on Jabez Wilson and how he was able to solve the case by just walking around a street corner. Watson says, “I trust that I am not more dense than my neighbors, but I was always oppressed with a sense of my own stupidity in my dealings with Sherlock Holmes.” (Pg.1181) This impressive intelligence level is what makes him unique and easily able to solve cases. Due to these high reasoning abilities he is also able to be the best at what he does. …show more content…
While John Clay, our antagonist, is portrayed to share all of these same qualities with Holmes. They take on these hero and villain characteristics to make them different characters yet they are still very much alike. Similarities between two characters, that are opposing each other, is common in many fictional pieces. Without this many of the famous good vs. evil personalities we know today would fail to exist. Holmes and Clay are just another dynamic duo that readers will find to be very similar and very
The two characters I decided to talk about are Eckels from A Sound of Thunder and the Narrator from The Scarlet Ibis. Even though these two characters are in very different situations, have very different conflicts, and are very different from each other, these two characters still have some interesting similarities. And Even though they do have some similarities to each other they show them in complete different ways from each other.
In the many stories we read, the two characters that seemed the most similar to me were General Zaroff, from The Most Dangerous Game, and the character only know as Eckles, the main character in The Sound of Thunder. These two characters are from different stories, though they do share many traits that can be compared. While one might question the morals of one more than the other, the general basis of their interests are similar at the least. As well as being similar though, again, they have some very obvious and blatant differences. For example, the game they hunt is heavily contrasted, and the means of their hunting is extremely different.
In "Could You Be the Next Sherlock?" by Kristen Lewis, Sherlock Holmes is perceived as a mindful man, in "Could You Be the Next Sherlock?" the author states, “Turns out, there is an aspect of Sherlock’s brilliance that we can all develop: mindfulness,” Lewis is implying that Sherlock Holmes is, indeed, a very mindful character. This trait is shown throughout the play,"The Red Headed League" by Arthur Goldwag. For example, on page 13 of "The Red Headed League", the author states, “The League was a ruse she and Duncan Ross cooked up to get Mr. Wilson out of the way for three days a week. My only question was why.
The two protagonists in the story share many similar traits, but also are very different.
In the Red Headed League, Holmes as the Protagonist does not lead a “Common place,” or ordinary, life because Mr. Holmes is more about solving mysteries rather than just staying home and doing nothing, unlike Mr. Watson. Mr. Holmes is a much more different person. He uses his solving skills to catch criminals. With his availability to do so, he can look for the clues to solve a mystery! What I think about Sherlock Holmes is that he’s a good detective with little confidence because every time he thinks he solved something, it ends up to be a mind twister.
Logic Watson! Give me logic Miss Walden!" Not only was this man rude but he was also bossy; just what I needed in my life. At least his friend 'Watson' is nice enough. I wish they would really make up their minds, was it psychology they wanted or was it philosophy? Clearing my throat I spoke, "How about I get you a both, Sherlock if you don't mind telling me what you need this book for it would be a lot easier to help find you a logical selection." Sherlock seemed surprised to find someone complying so quickly after just denouncing a whole branch of science, one I found some truth in. "Well you see, I'm a consulting detective, the only one in fact, and John and I have a case regarding a man with what I believe to be 'Mommy issues' going around kidnapping single mothers. Please be quick about all of this, we need this information now!" Sherlock described. All the while he's describing this all the pieces are coming together for me, Sherlock, the curly hair, Watson, consulting detective: Sherlock Holmes the main all over the papers lately with that silly hate of
Supporting great stories are characters that represent all that is good and egregious in real life. Joseph Conrad illustrates the character of Mr. Kurtz, and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle introduces the character of Sherlock Holmes; both authors creating significant stories in which Mr. Kurtz and Sherlock Holmes grow to become complex characters. As the story progresses, these characters change in ways that bring their personalities to light, allowing one to really understand who they are and what they are made of.
In the article, "Could You Be the Next Sherlock?" by Kristen Lewis, Sherlock Holmes can be associated with the characteristic, mindful. Lewis helps show this in the article by stating, “Turns out, there is an aspect of Sherlock’s brilliance that we can all develop: mindfulness...it can sharpen our mental powers as well as improve our health and emotional well-being”. This perfectly describes Sherlock. He has a sharp mind when it comes to solving mysteries, therefore, mindfulness perfectly describes Sherlock. This characteristic about Sherlock is also proven in the play, “The Red-Headed League” by Arthur Goldwag when he states, “Sherlock (thoughtfully): An awfully expensive joke, if that is all
The author, Kristen Lewis describes Sherlock Holmes as mindful in the essay “Could You Be the Next Sherlock?” Lewis writes about how Sherlock is known for his incredible ability to identify clues and solve mysteries with “little more than his brain.” She continues to say that anyone can be the next sherlock. “Turns out, there is an aspect of Sherlock’s brilliance that we can all develop: mindfulness.” Sherlock is observant and knowing of his surroundings, which allows him to pick up on hints and details others would have missed.
In all stories there are characters that make it worthwhile. Sherlock Holmes is a witty, yet arrogant young man. He solves crime in a short amount of time, with the help of his partner Dr. Watson. He boasts about his intelligence and acts like he is better than most people. Dr.Watson on the other hand is a feeble and polite man. He was a military doctor, who got injured, and is usually uplifting Sherlock. These two characters are very different, but share many of the same qualities like being unsociable, zealous, pompous, and fortitudinous. Given these points, Holmes and Watson’s similarities and differences make them a strong and unstoppable team.
Sherlock Holmes, the protagonist of The Red-headed League, does not lead a “commonplace” or ordinary life because he is a famous detective. Sherlock is more intelligent than the people around him. In the story, Sherlock knows the pawn broker’s assistant, Jabez Wilson, went to China because he noticed his tattoo. Wilson’s tattoo design could only have been done in China. Sherlock also noticed he wrote a lot because his sleeves of his coat. In the story Sherlock says: “What else can be indicated by that right cuff so very shiny for five inches, and the left one with the smooth patch near the elbow where you rest it upon the desk?” “Well, but China?” Wilson asks. “The fish that you have tattooed immediately above your right wrist could only have been done in China. I have made a small study of tattoo marks and have even contributed to the literature of the subject. That trick of staining the fishes’ scales of a delicate pink is quite peculiar to China. When in addition, I see a Chinese coin hanging from your watch-chain, the matter becomes even simpler.” Watson was unable to identify these things until Sherlock told them. Sherlock Holmes has appealed to millions of readers because it creates suspense. For example, Holmes asks Watson, “And I say, Doctor, there may be some little
Sherlock Holmes was definitely an intuitionist type of detective. As I read on page 20 of “A Study in Scarlet,” Sherlock holmes said to Watson,
Sherlock Holmes’s intelligence is demonstrated in both “The Red-Headed League” and “A Scandal in Bohemia”. During “A Scandal in Bohemia” he first demonstrates his intuitive thinking by figuring out that Count Kramm, the man introducing him on the case, is actually the King of Bohemia himself. This shows that he is able to make a quick determination about people’s lives just by having a brief conversation with them. This allows Holmes to solve mysteries that others cannot by simply looking at a suspect or location associated with the scenario. He uses this ability later in the story to find where the incriminating photo of the king with Adler is. He does this by creating a situation for himself where he will be able to get into Adler’s home. He then fakes a fire to see where Adler goes first so he can see where she keeps her most valuable possession, the photo. Holmes states “When a woman thinks that her house is on fire, her instinct is at once to rush to the thing which she values the most… Now it was clear to me that our lady of to-day had nothing in the house more precious to her then what we are questing for” (Doyle 19). This line of thinking shows that Holmes knows how to get people to inadvertently give him the information that he needs by putting them in the right situation and observing what they do. This skill
Sometimes two characters have striking similarities. Their stories take place in different time periods and they have dramatically different experiences and backgrounds, but they still relate to each other. One example of this is Jay Gatsby in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby and Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra’s Don Quixote. The Great Gatsby is set in the United States during the 1920s, while Don Quixote was written in 1605 in Spain. The two main characters of these stories, Jay Gatsby and Don Quixote, have very similar and different attributes and characteristics. Both men create different persona and names to live out their dreams and people try to stop them from achieving their dream, but the men have different levels of success.
The stories of Sherlock Holmes provide us with two fictional characters that are virtually polar opposites: Holmes and Watson. Holmes is the observant, deceptive, know-it-all detective, and Watson is his somewhat unobservant, quiet, and intelligent assistant. Many may discover that one of the two are somewhat relatable. In my case, that relatable character would be Watson. Therefore, my personality and actions are more similar to Watson’s than they are to Holmes’s. I am more like Watson considering as I am a loyal companion, I have emotions, and I accept that I do not know everything.