History Of Disorienting Encounters

Avoidance: This was huge in this movie; they could not stand the sight of one another. They did what they had to do to avoid one another.

Two examples that I find especially thought provoking are the Danziger studio and the Goldwyn Library. Built to blend into the local surroundings, the luxury residence was given a humble, rough exterior. Davis' explains that the rough exterior of the architecture reflects the underlying social phenomenon of "repression, surveillance and exclusion"(Davis, 224) that collectively forms the "fragmented, paranoid spatiality"(Davis, 229 ) that LA embodies. Moreover, The house's "camouflage"(Davis, 229 ) exterior creates a stark contrast to its luxurious interior, which places further emphasis on the exclusion and barrier between the "opulent"(Davis, 256) interior and the "rough"(Davis, 224 ) environment. I find Davis' assessment of the Daziger studio particularly agreeable and accurate as I truly believe that an architecture, its purpose and characteristic, sheds light to not only its physical environment but also its social environment, something that might not necessarily be as apparent. On the other hand, I find Davis' assessment of the Goldwyn library rather exaggerated. Judging from photos taken, the fifteen foot security wall is not as grotesque and 'fear-imposing' as Davis puts it. Davis described the library as "baroquely fortified...menacing...bizarre"(Davis, 246) and "paranoid"(Davis, 251). Although security and 'vandal-proof'' maybe, as Davis suggested, the initial goal of the design, I do not believe that it is as exaggerated as Davis

were in the same place as themselves so they could talk to each other, no matter what you

and truth. In the end they are both left with nothing but loneliness, hatred, and distrust. They

They have not escaped from anything, life is still the same as it always was. It is through these unfortunate, but inevitable, events that the brothers are able to reconnect and to obtain an understanding of each other.

demonstrates the amount they truly thought about each other. His significant other influenced him to bring the

Their stagnant relationship comes to a climax before returning to what it always has been. Throughout both of these stories, we are able

¨but he believed it would explain why he never seemed to fit into his parents life¨ (page 128) the point is that This shows that the parents didn't really pay attention to him and that also explains that he feels uncomfortable with his parents and the parents feel the same way. And maybe that also trying to say that the parents didn't have time for him because they might of had other things to do. Of course,it is possible to disagree with the view that There not connected to their parents .and instead argue that there close to their parents he is just thinks that but they do talk. but , other side is stronger since what must be remembered is that if there parents and him where close to each other then why would he say that he sometimes thinks that opinion then that means his parents might not really pay attention to him that he might feel that way or it could be other reasons that are not of him feeling ok with.That's why essentially they are don't connected with there parents.that will also explain why the excursion was

Their relationship is ruined from the greed and anguish, and ends in both of their

One day, their were children playing. Playing in a field. Their names were Valory and Lucus. Valory and Lucus have been friends since they were infants. Now they are both at the end of middle school. These two are peas in a pod, did everything togather and stood up for each other. No matter what, no matter where they would find each other. Togather they planed on growing old and seeing everything togather. Forever. One day though, their parents saw them and decided it wasn't healthy for them to spend that much time togather, for they would get to attached. Being that lucus's mother married the king and lucus became prince, and Valory was just Valory, a no one. But not to him. So, their parents decided and even agreed that Valory and her family

Their childhood friendship is forgotten in an instant, completely torn apart by the two men.

He "speaks daggers to her" and condemns her actions against her true family.  Both women are reproached for their relationships and interactions with other men.

In superficial ways the two male figures seem to be the same man, but the speaker has finally come to realize that the one she idolized is gone forever and the one who shares his image is actually a monster.

In the end of the movie, the interpersonal conflict was dealt appropriately, because both protagonists learned how to talk to each other and share their feelings, but it was a long process. The conflict in this movie escalated to the point that the couple communication style was quite aggressive “people who use an aggressive communication style tend to dominate conversations. They typically speak at a high or low pitch, and their tone of voice can be demanding” (Sole, 2011). Finally they realize that there is a conflict and work things out.

Kapasi and Mrs. Das are incapable of reaching a true friendship because they are anxious to openly speak with each other. Mrs. Das’ confession has unrealistic expectations and was not used as a way of mutually exchanging ideas or building a relationship, but rather using Mr. Kapasi to interpret her maladies and gain forgiveness. Communication can become miscommunication if both individuals are not aligned in their expectations of the conversation.