preview

Historical Inaccuracies In Gladiator

Good Essays

Gladiator, a movie presented by the collaboration of Dreamworks Pictures and Universal Pictures, tells of the tale of the mighty Maximus. The film began on the battle field as Maximus, the general, led his troops to fight what seemed to be savage Vikings. Flaming arrows flying everywhere, catapults, beheadings, swords flying, horses charging, everything an ancient Roman battle would seem like. Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius is introduced as well as Commodus, his son. As soon as these characters are introduced, the historical accuracy and inaccuracy of the film began to take place. The film had many historical inaccuracies from almost the very beginning of the film. The beginning of the historical inaccuracies begins with Commodus and Marcus …show more content…

This is historically inaccurate because Commodus was none of those. Commodus was fairly young when he took to the throne and he was also married to a woman by the name of Bruttia Crispina. Commodus also ruled alongside Marcus Aurelius before he inherited the throne. He never murdered his father for the throne. “In 180 he inherited an Empire with safe frontiers, thanks to his father's untiring efforts. During his reign he maintained this situation by coercion and diplomacy” (Hazel). Commodus was also never killed in the arena and was actually quite stronger physically than what he appeared to be in the film. According to Brittanica, “He renamed Rome Colonia Commodiana (“Colony of Commodus”). Physically impressive, he claimed he was Hercules and performed as a gladiator. His mistress and advisers had him strangled, ending the Antonine dynasty” (Britannica). This also led to the fact that the movie made it seem to be that Commodus had ruled for maybe five years or so, when in actuality he ruled the Roman Empire for about thirteen years or so. Now the movie does capture the historical essence and character of Commodus. Commodus began the movie being loving and supportive, but as the movie went on he became deranged, extremely emotional, power hungry, and unimaginably hostile. This is what Commodus is characterized as after …show more content…

The first mistake made was when they claimed the Coliseum could hold fifty thousand people, when in actuality it can hold thousands more than that. The fights and battles Maximus endured with his companions in the Coliseum were also inaccurate. Maximus and his group went up against various chariots at once, various fighters at once, and Maximus even took on one guy surround by tigers. The scenes were full of blood and gore with people being chopped in half, stabbed, beheaded, etc. Stuff like this actually didn’t happen. Of course the threat of death still lingered throughout the games, but it did not linger as heavily as it did in the movie. Events that usually took place in the arena include “boxing, running, and wrestling contests, occasional mock battles, and two- and four-horse chariot races. Sometimes the drivers were accompanied by partners on foot, who, after a chariot crossed the finish line, had to race each other back to the other end of the arena to decide the entire contest” (Romani). The games actually had referees, consisted mainly of one versus one challenges, and there were even rules to follow. Also, the games would typically last a day, but the movie made it last for over several days and possibly even months. Now there was a slight accuracy of the Coliseum victories in the movie. “The victor earned palm branches or money, and after a few victories a gladiator

Get Access