Gladiator, a movie presented by the collaboration of Dreamworks Pictures and Universal Pictures, tells of the tale of the mighty Maximus. The film began on the battle field as Maximus, the general, led his troops to fight what seemed to be savage Vikings. Flaming arrows flying everywhere, catapults, beheadings, swords flying, horses charging, everything an ancient Roman battle would seem like. Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius is introduced as well as Commodus, his son. As soon as these characters are introduced, the historical accuracy and inaccuracy of the film began to take place. The film had many historical inaccuracies from almost the very beginning of the film. The beginning of the historical inaccuracies begins with Commodus and Marcus …show more content…
This is historically inaccurate because Commodus was none of those. Commodus was fairly young when he took to the throne and he was also married to a woman by the name of Bruttia Crispina. Commodus also ruled alongside Marcus Aurelius before he inherited the throne. He never murdered his father for the throne. “In 180 he inherited an Empire with safe frontiers, thanks to his father's untiring efforts. During his reign he maintained this situation by coercion and diplomacy” (Hazel). Commodus was also never killed in the arena and was actually quite stronger physically than what he appeared to be in the film. According to Brittanica, “He renamed Rome Colonia Commodiana (“Colony of Commodus”). Physically impressive, he claimed he was Hercules and performed as a gladiator. His mistress and advisers had him strangled, ending the Antonine dynasty” (Britannica). This also led to the fact that the movie made it seem to be that Commodus had ruled for maybe five years or so, when in actuality he ruled the Roman Empire for about thirteen years or so. Now the movie does capture the historical essence and character of Commodus. Commodus began the movie being loving and supportive, but as the movie went on he became deranged, extremely emotional, power hungry, and unimaginably hostile. This is what Commodus is characterized as after …show more content…
The first mistake made was when they claimed the Coliseum could hold fifty thousand people, when in actuality it can hold thousands more than that. The fights and battles Maximus endured with his companions in the Coliseum were also inaccurate. Maximus and his group went up against various chariots at once, various fighters at once, and Maximus even took on one guy surround by tigers. The scenes were full of blood and gore with people being chopped in half, stabbed, beheaded, etc. Stuff like this actually didn’t happen. Of course the threat of death still lingered throughout the games, but it did not linger as heavily as it did in the movie. Events that usually took place in the arena include “boxing, running, and wrestling contests, occasional mock battles, and two- and four-horse chariot races. Sometimes the drivers were accompanied by partners on foot, who, after a chariot crossed the finish line, had to race each other back to the other end of the arena to decide the entire contest” (Romani). The games actually had referees, consisted mainly of one versus one challenges, and there were even rules to follow. Also, the games would typically last a day, but the movie made it last for over several days and possibly even months. Now there was a slight accuracy of the Coliseum victories in the movie. “The victor earned palm branches or money, and after a few victories a gladiator
After viewing the three epics, Ridley Scott’s Gladiator, Daniel Vigne’s The Return of Martin Guerre, and Bille August’s Les Misérables, they showed authenticity through historically accurate values, locations, and characters. Vigne’s film creates authenticity more through actual historical events relevant to the movie plot, whereas Scott and August’s movies used realistic values and issues of the movies time period to create authenticity. The film Gladiator, directed by Ridley Scott, was an Ancient
Gladiator is an epic historical action drama set in the Roman Empire during the reign of Commodus, the last emperor of the Nerva–Antonine dynasty. The film is directed by Ridley Scott and features big name actors such as Russel Crowe, Joaquin Phoenix, and the late Richard Harris. In brief the story of Gladiator centers Maximus Decimus Meridius (Russel Crowe), a betrayed Roman General who is forced into becoming a gladiator. Maximus fights his way from a lowly arena on the outskirts of the empire
Hollywood has been making historical films for ages, trying to succeed in a film where no one can complain about historical accuracies. Unfortunately in the 200 film Gladiator director Ridley Scott did not succeed. The film Gladiator may have had some accurate points but for the most part was not faithful to Roman history. With the poor representations of Marcus Aurelius, Commodus and creating an entirely new character as well as how the gladiatorial events in the movie didn’t fully show how intricate
said about the accuracy of the historical references shown in the movie “Gladiator?” “Gladiator” is both accurate and inaccurate in its historical perception of the Roman Empire in AD 180, although there is a larger amount of inaccurate references than there is of accurate ones. This will be an evaluation of areas of the movie “Gladiator” that contain historical accuracies and inaccuracies in the portrayal of the Roman Empire. We will focus first on the inaccuracies and accuracies of Romans’ military
Colosseum and the gladiatorial events held within the historic architecture. Because of the famous site and it’s history many writers, directors, and artists have been inspired to display Rome’s culture in artwork, books, and movies. One recent movie, Gladiator, is one of these movies as it hones in on the end of Marcus Aurelius’ reign and Commodus’ reign. It focuses on the main protagonist- Maximus- and his life during the time period. The movie ends with the slay of Commodus by Maximus and Maximus dying
Title: Unraveling the Historical Misconceptions of Pompeii: A Critical Analysis. Introduction: The 2014 movie "Pompeii" offers a cinematic spectacle of epic proportions, depicting the catastrophic eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 AD and its devastating impact on the ancient city of Pompeii. While the film captivates audiences with its stunning visual effects and dramatic narrative, it also perpetuates several historical inaccuracies. This essay aims to dissect these inaccuracies, shedding light on
Cassia did in the movie. The seating during the gladiator game was also inaccurate. During the game in the film, men and women were standing next to each other. However, during the first century, men and women sat
The film that I selected for this film review is Pompeii, a 2014 historical disaster movie that was directed by Paul W.S. Anderson and written by Janet Scott Batchler and Lee Batchler. The movie was adapted from a 2003 book with the same title that was written by Robert Harris. I chose Pompeii because I heard about the devastating event that took place in the ancient Roman city in various television programs and books. As a result, I wanted to learn more about the event and the daily life of Pompeii
What can be said about the accuracy of the historical references in the movie Gladiator? Gladiator is both accurate and inaccurate in its historical perception of the Roman Empire in AD 180. First, we will focus on the inaccuracies and accuracies of the Romans’ military strategies and weapons portrayed in “Gladiator.” There was no last great battle with the Germanic tribes on the eve of Marcus Aurelius’ death. There was a big battle that took a whole day to achieve victory late in the campaigning
The Gladiator epic directed by Riley Scott (2000) is based on real life events of the Roman Empire, their society, as well as the role of gladiators. Scott tried to portray the Roman culture as accurately as he could, and even went further to ensure his authenticity by hiring several historians to do so . It is supported by the findings of historians’ research. The film is historically accurate in most parts, including the role of gladiators; gladiatorial games and the aspects of Roman society such
Gladiator Throughout Hollywood history, movies have been depicted a lot differently than what art historians believe had actually happened. Movies have been glorified, characters have been given different ensembles, and new characters have been developed and introduced. The movie Gladiator was a big success in the box office and it won many awards. Although the movie was appropriate in the Hollywood side of things, there are many differences between what Hollywood wants their audience to see and
the movie the, "Gladiator" and thought that most if not all of it was true. Sadly this movie paints a picture that falls short of fact and leans more towards fiction. Winning 5 academy awards it is a hit with the audience but with historians a bust. This is mainly due to the inconsistencies revolving around character portrayals, events, and even characters that don't exist. I'm sure that this is because the truth wouldn't fair as well as the movie did. Moreover the," Gladiator" which is a winner
Spartacus, a fearsome gladiator and general in the war against slavery in Rome, was portrayed as a born-slave that was eventually bought after having a squabble with a Roman soldier during slave-labor. According to Appian, a Roman historian in 2nd century A.D., “At the same time Spartacus, a Thracian by birth, who had once served as a soldier with the Romans, but had since been a prisoner and sold for a gladiator, and was in the gladiatorial training-school at Capua, …” (217). This shows that Kubrick
Before taking this course, my perception of Roman spectacles was unfortunately heavily based upon what I was told by my elders or what I saw in movies like Gladiator, Hercules and Pompeii. Taking this course has been the biggest eye opener regarding the truth about what really happened in Ancient Rome, specifically regarding spectacles. I also feel like I’ve learned that I should not just aimlessly believe what I am told or what I see in movies, because people clearly lie about a lot of things and
wife and child to be executed. Maximus was able to escape his execution, but his wife and child were not as fortunate. Thus began Maximus’s Gladiator career under his crowd given name: “The Spaniard.” The events listed above are all actually fictional despite them involving two very real Roman Emperors and come from the 2000s movie; Gladiator. Although Gladiator is