How would teenagers react to a law that states that one must receive a high school diploma in order to obtain a driver’s license? I, for one, would not be a jolly camper, as I rely on the ability to drive for functions similar to school or work. I also see countless young adults would oppose this law for the same reasons. In this essay, I will dive into the effects of this law, including the hidden obscurities that would have those effects tied to them. One effect would be the availability for teenagers to work. Firstly, if teens cannot work, then they might not be able to support their families. Families that exist on welfare need as much money as they can acquire, and a child not pulling his or her share of the work would cripple the …show more content…
Firstly, it would seem that the parents could assist that. This is wrong since parents can’t always arrive to work late, leave work early, and still say, “This remained a decent idea.” Parents have responsibilities that supersede the need for schooling. Secondly, is would also seem that the state-paid transportation services would be a sure-fire way to negate the first point. However, this doesn’t apply to the children who live too distant from transportation to care. This makes it tough for the students outside of that line to arrive at school. Finally, it would seem that friends with parental rides to aid each other. This doesn’t work with teens who either have no friends or lives too remote for the friend to reach them. This would force the child to walk, no matter how far away the school is. This is yet another paramount factor in the necessity of a teen’s driver’s license; nevertheless, there is still one other vital factor …show more content…
Firstly, the entire reason many teens receive driver’s licenses is for the reason that they can be free. Taking the freedom from a teen is identical to imprisoning them. The statement is true since neither situation allows them to leave at their own whim. Secondly, teens obtain driver’s licenses for the reason that one might desire to clear their head, or remove themselves from an abusive family. Being able to escape is needed in one’s life, lest they wish to be trapped in their own regrets and shame. Escaping an abusive family is an absolute must, for the simple reason that is isn’t ethical to force them to stay. Finally, teens enjoy hanging out with friends. It’s a natural part of society to aspire to be with other people than their family from time to time. Parties remain an example of a piece of society that would be demolished if driver’s licenses were retrieved from teenagers until the completion of high school. This, along with the other two factors, stands the key reasons teens should retain their licenses once they obtain it at age
Mental Illness - The prisoner’s moral culpability for his offending is reduced by reason of his mental illness and the objective
PHL 612 Philosophy of Law [Calendar Description]: What is law? What makes something a legal norm? Should
Maturity and rationalization is not yet achieved or experienced by teenagers. In the era of technology there are several distractions for drivers of any age to maneuver. Parents can play an educational role by enrolling their teen into a driver’s educational program. Some states require students to complete a comprehensive graduated drivers licensing (GDL) program prior to receiving their license. The brain function is still developing in teenagers and may impede the quick thinking process necessary to become a responsible driver. For the safety and welfare of teenagers the age requirement in Arizona for a driver’s license should be increased from 16 to 18 years of age.
Teenagers in America have lots of responsibilities and places to be like their jobs and school. In July of 2015 over 20.3 million 16-24 year olds were employed. If those teens below age 18 or 21 weren’t allowed to drive, that makes their job even harder than they already are.
However, their argument would be invalid considering that students’ grades/ intelligence level and their driving skills don’t have anything to do with the other. If students are getting good grades in school it doesn’t necessarily mean that their driving skills are going to be equal with the intelligence level. Besides, in an article it reads that, “The mean grade point average for female high school graduates was 3.10 in 2009, .33 higher than the average GPA for young women in 1990. The average GPA for male high school graduates over the same period rose .31 points to 2.90.” and that, “Some say this means American high schools are churning out smarter, harder-working students.”( U.S. News). This evidence proves that the policy that students should have good grades before they can receive their license is unnecessary because students are already doing better grade wise. I can’t say myself for a fact that teens
Recently there has been a debate whether California should pass a ‘No Pass/No Drive’ law. This law states that if a student under 18 who skips classes too much or drops out of school would not be allowed to drive. Many people think that this law is unfair and should not take effect because it doesn’t guarantee that students will get better in school, but that is simply untrue. In fact, I believe this law should be brought into California because it motivates students to get better grades and will lower the crime rate of California.
Students are being handcuffed, arrested and expelled for possession of a butter knife or water gun, punishment that disproportionately targets African-American students, students being alienated and never returning to school after being suspended or expelled are all byproducts of the zero tolerance policies adopted by their school district. School administrators have abandoned common sense due to their adherence to zero tolerance policies by applying the same discipline to students that are guilty of minor offenses and non-violent rules violations, or just poor judgment as they due to
Many teens in the US are employed part time while also attending high school. Having a license enables these teens to get to and from work, job interviews, or even in some cases become employed in the delivery business. USA Today reports that while 30% of teens have jobs, employment rate is still falling. Increasing the driving age would only decrease the number of teens in the workforce. Surprisingly one third of those teens working, do so to support their family. Without proper transportation these teens would be forced to either miss more school or work less in order to make ends meet while still
Teens need the freedom to drive so they don't have to rely on their parents.
I will admit it; in high school and for a few years after, I had no interest in attending college. It was my belief people could succeed without a college degree if they worked hard enough. I still wholeheartedly believe that. However, I have come to the realization I am not one of those people.
In conclusion people should have a high school diploma before having a driver’s licence, for two reasons some people are too immature to be handling a driver's license, some people who do have a driver's licence but no car sometimes don’t really have enough education about how to drive cars, but for a counter claim ;however, Most people would learn at a younger and better age to drive than those who learn to old and have some difficulties
Along with making it easy to get to school, high schoolers that have their license are more responsible and mature. Not every kid, but some, have to pay for their own gas. It also makes kids more responsible because they will now have curfews and things that they need to meet on their own. No more having mom and dad picking them up. If they leave and they're parents say they need to be back by twelve, they are the ones responsible for getting themselves home at that time. Having a license makes teens more mature too because they can start doing things for themselves like getting food or going to a doctor's appointment.
entertainment? Youngsters are known for partying, sneaking out, drinking; when it is illegal and we can not have people like this causing chaos on our streets. Minors are also distracted too easily with the latest technology, friends and other passengers. Teenagers also like to eat, talk, and groom which is a distraction. A distraction is anything that could divert a person’s attention from their main task, which is driving. Studies have shown sixteen year olds are immature and their mind is not fully developed, and therefore should not be able to drive. They also do not have enough experience as most youth get their license at the age of sixteen and hardly practice safety on the roads before that. Teenagers consistently cause trouble, they should not be permitted to drive until eighteen years of age.
Teen drivers have the mentality were they are untouchable when behind the wheel. But it’s obviously to much to handle for them because when it comes to the facts to many teens die a year. In 2007, 4,200 teens in the U.S aged from 15-17 were killed and 400,000 were treated in the E.R for injuries because of car accidents (“Motor vehicle safety, Teen Drivers, page 1”). This just shows how irresponsible teens are while driving. In a national survey 12.5% of all high school students rarely wear seatbelts, this just asking too get hurt in case an accident happens (“Motor vehicle safety, Teen Drivers, page 1”). This just shows how teens have a bad mentality while driving. In 2005, 54% of teen deaths occurred between 3 p.m. and midnight on a Friday, Saturday, or Sunday. This statistic shows that one more reason why a teen would want there license is to get to a party or go
I understand getting a license is difficult, but in the end everything you go through is worth it. The driver will have more experience, more time to learn, and the driver will learn to drive with others as well as driving on your own. So I think that establishment of graduated licenseing is a good thing for teenagers and for society. When you take your