Heteronormative Assumptions

There are two main reasons why many religious groups are against same-sex marriage. The first argument is that people who are gay are not able to procreate. They do not have the correct corresponding body parts to make children (Waldman, 2003). Anyone who has taken sex education knows that humans can not reproduce without a male’s sperm and a female’s egg. Roman Catholics believe God created marriage as a lifetime union between one woman and one man with the purpose of having a loving relationship and for procreating, caring for, and teaching children (Charron & Skylstad, 1996). Sex that does not occur with the intent of procreation is not approved by many faiths. In Judaism, for example, there is an important Bible passage that supports this idea. The story of Onan is about Onan sleeping with his dead brother’s wife. In order to prevent having children, Onan does not ejaculate inside of his brother’s wife. Instead he ejaculated on the ground. Because

Same sex marriage has definitely been increasing over the years, especially because of the new law that recently passed about gay marriage in the United States. Marriage is known as a social union and it is the commitment between two individuals. The Defense of Marriage Act allowed same sex couples to be as equal as heterosexual couples, which was passed in 1996. The United States followed “structural functionalism,” which is defined by Kelly Welch (2012) as a “framework that tries to get families to follow society’s norms and rules”, in order to fits its needs, same sex marriage was not very prevalent like how it is currently. Because society followed structural functionalism, which consisted of a father, mother, and children, it was as if same-sex marriage was completely isolated and excluded, which makes them feel completely vulnerable and lonely. Majority of the families in the United States are now “nuclear” and do not necessarily follow the structured family lifestyle. According to Welch (2012) “nuclear families consist of a biological father, a biological mother, and children”, which is the basic principle. Thus, both frameworks definitely make homosexual individuals feel a sense of emptiness and they feel as if they are being discriminated within society.

There are many controversies surrounding today's world, such as abortion, animal testing, and social reform issues. It seems that no one can come to a common agreement on the legitimacy of these topics. Personal characteristics, such as upbringing, culture, religion and ethnicity, all play a role in determining one's feelings on a given controversial issue. However, one of the most protested and discussed issues in current political debate is same-sex marriage. There is no right or wrong answer to this question, only hard pressed arguments expressing speculation regarding supposed outcomes, benefits and possible tribulations that would come along with the endorsement of gay marriage. Such ideas are shown

The topic of my article is called “ The case of Gay Marriage”. Gay marriage has been a very sensitive and controversial topic for several decades, but the public opinions on this topic has been evolving. Even with all of the social and legal changes that have occurred over the past few decades, there are still millions of people in the U.S. who are fervently opposed to the idea of same-sex marriage. This article is effective because the author describes how gay marriage should be accepted and treated as a heterosexual marriage.

The example of the ban on same sex marriage in America is a prime and relevant event reflecting institutional discrimination in modern day. “Institutional discrimination permeates American systems so deeply that we may not recognize it” (Day & Scheile, 2012). Institutional discrimination enforces what is socially accepted or the social norm and same sex marriage, up until this point, had not been either. With the Supreme Court ruling in June 2015 to lift the ban on same sex marriage, the value system of many Americans are beginning to be tested. “Normatively, marriage is a social, sexual and economic relationship in which a man and a women are legally joined to found and maintain a family” (Day & Scheile, 2012). As we, being society, move

Same-sex marriage, a controversial social issue in the U.S. for several decades, is constantly evolving. When viewed historically, great change has happened in a short period of time, in the movement for same-sex marriage, given that until recently, no society in thousands of years has ever allowed it.

Same sex or gay marriage is a topic that is always in the news these days. Well, a recent Supreme Court case's decision was to legalize this type of marriage here in the US. This essay will give a brief history of same sex marriages, summarize the legal reasoning of both the majority and dissent in the Supreme Court Decision and even evaluate how the media interpreted the decision.

Same-sex marriage at this time one of the most debated political issues in our nation. The controversy over same-sex marriage is a very touchy subject. It involves many legislative, religious and family matters. Advocates claim that same-sex couples should have the same marriage rights and that same-sex marriages should be acknowledged the same way as heterosexual couples. Advocated state that eliminating gay marriage is a form of discrimination. The varying definitions of marriage comes with a large amount of dispute. Those who support same-sex marriage often debate that love should be the main reason for marriage, regardless of your sexual orientation. Those who are opposed often quote religious viewpoints and concerns about the nurturing

Marriage, for years has been argued that the rights to it or strictly only between a man and a women. Both sexes are assumed to marry someone of the opposite sex. What if, however, an individual wanted to marry someone of the same sex? Why is this debate so heavily heated amongst individuals? Is it that religion is a large structure base that those in society are guided by? Or is it that individuals do not understand that marriage is a union between two individuals who are in love? Whatever the case may be, there is always someone who has to argue that homosexual marriage is “wrong.”

There are many reasons that individuals think that same-sex marriage will destroy the traditional way of marriage. One of the main points that are brought up is the person’s spiritualty. Each person in society has their own individual beliefs; some believe the same-sex marriage is incompatible with their views and since the government made the decision it is forces the person to disregard their own beliefs and accept it as their own. This is false, even though it is the law you don’t have to think its right and accept it as true, mentally. Though they do have to follow the law in the actual world, they don’t have to agree with it’s meaning and support it. There for people can keep their pre-conceived notion of the traditional way of marriage and have anybody be able to marry as the law. Another point that individuals bring up in the relation to

One of the most controversial issues around today is gay marriages. Many believe that the media is primly responsible for the idea of same-sex marriages, but when it all comes down to it there are really only two sides; those who support gay marriages, and those who oppose them. Two authors write their opinions on their opposite views on this issue. Sullivan (2002) supports same-sex marriages and believes marriage to be a universal right, not just restricted to heterosexuals. Contrary to Sullivan, Bennett (2002) believes that marriage is a sacred traditional family value that should be set aside for heterosexual couples. (2002)Throughout this essay, I will summarize both authors’ ideas and evaluate them through their evidence and

From the philosophical points of Kantianism, Utilitarianism, and Virtue Ethics on same-sex marriage, there are good reasons which are relevant to good will, duty, the principle of utility, and eudaimonia to support same-sex marriage. Although the Supreme Court has ruled that the Constitution places the right to same-sex marriage, people who stick to conservative position on same-sex relationships believe that a same-sex relationship violates moral and religious beliefs. Especially, religious objectors on same-sex marriage are a highly controversial topic because people who believe on religious grounds that define a marriage as a legal union between one man and one woman to pursue traditional family values. However, everything must change. The powerful social movements have accelerated the same-sex marriage issue in regard to the fundamental rights and the social justice. The social change involves inevitable consequences of the issue; so, the Supreme Court’s decision on same-sex marriage has a validation. Therefore, Homosexual people should be entitled to federal marriage rights and

The institutions of marriage and family are fundamental concepts to the functioning of our present day society. In this paper, marriage and family and their changes over time will be discussed. Topics such as religion, which plays an important role is the development and changes of ideas regarding these two topics will be approached as well as the social changes due to tradition and the changes of time in regards of marriage and traditional thoughts of marriage and family. In this paper, these topics are discussed in order to establish how they have effected same sex marriage and marriage in general.

Those that are oppose same sex marriage focus their reasoning on religious beliefs. Same sex couples do not want to be treated as second class citizens, they do not focus on what religion states; they just want to be treated as equal as heterosexuals when it comes to their right. Same sex couples believe if one is to bar any class of people from marrying whomever they choose, it then deprives them of their social institution; that many feel defines the most meaningful part of life, to marry someone one loves. Same sex couples believe that their relationships are no different than that of a heterosexual marriage. Same sex couples can have maintain a home together, provide an environment that children can thrive in and care for each other the same as heterosexual married couples do (Goldberg-Hiller, 2002).

Historically, there is limited evidence for cultures that that relied on same sex marriage as a primary relationship structure. However, currently there is growing cultural acceptance of same sex marriage and gay-affirming communities in which same sex relationships and same sex marriages experience support (Baunach, 2012). According to the 2010 United States Census, same sex households¬¬–also called unmarried same sex partner households–grew by 80.4% between the 2000 and 2010 US Census. One June 26th of 2015, the American Supreme Court ruled that banning same-sex marriage in any U.S. state was unconstitutional (Pew Research, 2015). This new occurrence will offer an opportunity for more research regarding same-sex marriage culture.