Henry Moore was the most celebrated sculptor of his time, and the second part of his career, in particular, demonstrated that Modernist sculpture was, after all, surprisingly adaptable to official needs. In this sense, Moore was the contemporary equivalent of the great Neo Classical sculptors such as Canova and Thorwaldsen.
Moore was born in July 1898 in Castleford, Yorkshire, the seventh child of a mine manager who had worked at the pit face. Both parents were strong and supportive personalities, and Moore's childhood was a happy one. He became a student teacher in 1915, and by 1916 was teaching in the local elementary school which he had attended in his boyhood. At seventeen he joined the army, as the youngest member of his regiment,
…show more content…
Moore married a beautiful Russian, Irma Radetzsky, in 1929, and in 1931 they bought a small cottage in Kent where he could work during the Royal College holidays. He was still obsessed, as he had been from the beginning, with the idea of direct carving, and at this time everything was laboriously hewn by hand. His second one man exhibition also took place that year, and it was Epstein who wrote the catalogue introduction, saying: 'For the future of sculpture in England Henry Moore is vitally important.' By this time he was sufficiently well known to have become a controversial figure. His show was savagely attacked in the Morning Post and a number of other newspapers and periodicals. The Morning Post review was brought to the attention of the Royal College ofArt and played a role in the non renewal of his teaching appointment in 1932, after seven years. Fortunately Moore was able to move to the Chelsea School of Art, which had already approached him.
In 1934 he sold his cottage in Kent and bought another, equally small, but with five acres of ground attached to it which enabled him to see his work in the open air. In London the Moores lived in Hampstead, where they came together with the group which included Ben Nicholson and Barbara Hepworth, and the critic Herbert Read. Nicholson inclined to Constructivism, but Moore, though reluctant to join any stylistic grouping, was more interested in Surrealism, and
Moore, the author, states that Tony is persistent that his younger brother, Wes, is not following his example of being a drug addict, but instead is staying in school and out of trouble. Still, Tony and Mary’s attempts fail to prevent Moore from doing drugs. Rather than taking Tony’s advice, Wes chooses to follow and copy his older brother, Tony, and both of them ultimately end up being sent to prison for the same
When Roger Woodward was 7 years old he went on a boat for the first time in his life. His family was celebrating his 17 year old sister’s birthday with a tour of niagara falls by boat. Rogers mother’s one condition about this trip was that he wore a life jacket because roger did not know how to swim. In not long roger would be falling down the falls. The day was perfect for boating it was warm and the waters were calm. The owner of the boat jim honeycutt let roger steer the boat. They were heading toward sandbar and on the way there the mortar of the boat hit a rock. Honeycutt cut the engine after hitting the rock. They were drifting toward the falls. For some reason Honeycutt had no anchor so he was trying to paddle the other way but the
Wes Moore establishes his writing style quickly with an intriguingly dictated introduction. Every word carefully chosen to lay out how he came across this story. How intricately the story intersects not only his life but the life of a man with too many similarities to Wes including sharing his name. Wes Moore introduces the readers into his world with the utmost respect for the people in this intense anecdote while making sure that respect translates into interest and concern for the people, not boredom.
In the book, The Other Wes Moore it is difficult to believe the great similarities in the lives of the two Moores, who share a name and other aspects of life. The two were raised fatherless and were born in the late 1970’s in the neighborhood of Baltimore, Maryland. They also happen to have encountered similar experiences when growing up, but at one point one of them became a criminal and the other a scholar (the author of the book). The author of the book seems to be interested in the similarities of the two boys as opposed to their different experiences. The story is interesting and makes one imagine what would have become of the writer if he did not by any chance come across the people who guided him to become what
Alfred Moore, a confederate soldier, was born in 1837. Accompanied by twelve other siblings, he grew up on a farm in Fairfax County, Virginia. His life before he enlisted as a first sergeant in the Fairfax County seemed very simple. Mary Moore, his mother, inherited property worth $8,000 following her husband’s death. Alfred decided to live on this property with a few of his siblings. Together, they cultivated the farm. Throughout the years of work, Alfred remained unmarried. In April 1861, he was enlisted in the Fairfax Calvary. A month later Alfred was captured by Federal troops along with 34 other members of the company. After being directed to take an oath of allegiance, he was sent home until later notice. The company that Alfred was a part of was reorganized and he was still listed as the first sergeant. Eventually, he was granted a promotion to become the third lieutenant of the company. Alfred continued to progress in authority levels until he was in command of
John Henry Moore (Colonel John H. Moore) was born on August 13, 1800, in Rome, Tennessee. He ran away from home to and settled in Texas in 1818 until his father brought him back. Afterwards, he returned Texas and became of the first settlers on the upper part of the Colorado River in 1824. During 1823 and 1824, he fought the Indians along the Colorado River and would later go into a partnership with Thomas Gray as one of Stephen F. Austin's original settlers. In August 16, 1824, they later went into a partnership with the title to land currently now located in Brazoria and Colorado counties. He would later marry, lead an expedition and would be part of the Texas Revolution. In September 1835, he was warned of the Mexican attacks and was one
"We sometimes underestimated the influence of the little things" (Charles W. Chestnutt). This quote tells a little bit of how little decision can be big decisions or is it the opposite. The book The Other Wes More by Wes Moore tells the lives of two people both named Wes Moore. One Wes is living a life of crime and the other Wes is living a life of military school. The two Wes grew up near each other about the same time in the 70's or 80's. The author Wes visited the other Wes in jail to make this novel about both of there lives and discussed what made there lives different. In the book, The Other Wes Moore by Wes Moore, the author explores the ideas of decisions to develop the theme even small decisions or ones that seem small a person makes each day can affect a persons future in a negative or positive way.
Walking around campus and looking at all the statues and the art pieces in the Bizzell Memorial Library it was hard to choose which two pieces I thought had the most in common. After going back and forth, the two pieces that I decided had the most in common were the The “Sower” by Paul R. Moore located between the Centennial Arches on the south end of the south oval and the Ada Lois Sipuel Fisher Garden located on the north end of campus, next to Jacobson Hall. I chose these two because they both have historical meaning and are cornerstones for the University. I think we should admire these two sculptures for their profound meaning and character. These two pieces of art work have a background and a story that contributes to their uniqueness.
Alecia Beth "Pink" Moore is a singer from the United States. She's also a songwriter, dancer, and has done a bit of acting. She started out in a girl band and rose to fame as a solo artist later on. Here are some of the most memorable quotes ever spoken by the star.
A person’s success or failure can be determined by their environment, education, choices; a number of different things. The autobiography The Other Wes Moore takes a look at two boys with the same name and eerily similar circumstances who end up in very different places in life. Wes Moore spoke at convocation about his book and what he hoped that people would get from it. In the book he says “The chilling truth is that his story could have been mine. The tragedy is that my story could have been his.” (Moore xi). These two men didn’t share the same fate because they each made a choice about what they wanted their life to become. The book truly demonstrates how the choices you make, make you. One Wes
2. The author Moore describes the culture in the streets with violence, drug dealing, and lack of education. Guys think its cool for them to do drugs, being cool at school, and fighting because it makes them men. Wes was a drug dealer he was once caught selling rock to an undercover cop. Besides dealing them he also did them, “ … Wes held the plastic bag with both hands and poured in nine ounces of cocaine.” (145) The author Wes and the other Wes both tried to act cool about school. Tony always told him, “Yo, you need to take this shit serious, man. Acting stupid ain’t cool!” (27) And the author Wes told the story when he got into a fight but made him sound cool, “... I decided to juice up the story up a little. Or a lot.” (50) Tony told Wes
I feel as though some critics may take Moore's argument to literally. Moore is not just saying that, "Here is my right hand and here is my left hand. Therefore, I have hands and there is no need for skepticism." I believe that Moore is really trying to say that you are more justified in believing that you have two hands (or two eyes, two ears, etc.) compared to believing in the premises that are present in your skeptical argument. One could say Moore is not wrong in thinking that knowledge of his hands is non-inferential because his argument shows that a skeptical argument needs more than just doubt of an instance of reality. Moore shows how logic provides backing to a positive knowledge claim (in this case, his argument regarding his
Two people born with the same name in the same neighborhood ending up with totality different fates. They both lived difficult lives but the author Wes Moore ended up being a successful businessman while the other Wes Moore is serving a life sentence in jail. Both boys were born in Baltimore coming from low income families and growing up without a father. They both dealt with drugs and lived in violent neighborhoods but their decisions and actions is what lead them to have totality different fates. Wes Moore made more conscious decisions by staying out of drugs and not jeopardizing his future. While the other Wes Moore choose the drug life and got into a lot of trouble with the police. The outcome of their life today is affected by the decisions
Henry Hudson was an English explorer, who sailed along the North East coast of North American. His early life is unknown, for there is not even a record of the year he was born. His final days are a mystery, after his mutinous crew set him adrift in the bay that bears his name, June 1611. It is believed that he could have been the grandson of a London alderman who helped found the Muscovy Company, which is a trading company. Hudson took four voyages beginning in 1607 and continued to1611, making claims for the English and the Dutch. At one point, he was arrested for working with the Dutch, because in those days working for another country was considered treason. Hudson was also known as the grandfather of the English whaling
d. Although Wes and the other Wes Moore both grew up in the same city around the same time period, both