preview

Henry I Miller's 'Ignoring The Ignorant'

Decent Essays

Ignoring the Ignorant In the article “Ignoring the Ignorant”, Henry I Miller effectively sheds light to his readers on the serious threat that ignorance poses society when it is allowed to influence public policy. The author makes a strong case that conveys the message that ignorance poses a serious threat to scientific, social and economic development when it is allowed to drive public policy by successfully using rhetorical strategies such as Satire, Ethos, Pathos, and Logos. “People have a right to be ignorant. Just as we can choose to damage our health by overeating, smoking cigarettes, and neglecting to take prescribed medications, we can also choose to remain uninformed on policy issues.” Miller uses satiric strategy to ridicule the …show more content…

The new mosquitos contain a gene that produces high levels of a protein that stops their cells from functioning normally, ultimately killing them.” And “While similar releases in Florida are years away, some locals have already reacted forcefully. One activist gathered 100,000 signatures on a petition to oppose using the mosquitoes in eradication efforts.” But their concerns are ““What if these mosquitoes bite my boys or my dogs? What will they do to the ecosystem?” if the activist had done her/his job they would have found out that “When released, they survive just long enough to mate with wild females, passing along the protein-producing gene, which kills their offspring before they reach maturity – resulting in the species’ elimination after a few generations.” Which again supports the author’s statement that it is okay to be ignorant poses a serious threat to scientific, social and economic development when it is allowed to drive public policy, the activist remained ignorant which then affected 100,000 other people just like her to sign a petition. “A 2001 study sponsored by the US National Science Foundation found that roughly half of people surveyed understood that the earth circles the sun once a year, 45% could give an “acceptable definition” for DNA, and only 22% understood what a molecule was” this is when people mostly choose to remain ignorant when it comes to science or technology the author uses logos continuously show you how far ignorance goes, as long as the information does not directly affect the person then they do not find it necessary to know about such topic “the success of the environmental movement; a deep-seated distrust of industry; the public’s insatiable appetite for stories related to health, which the media duly cater to; and – not least – the striking expansion of the fields of epidemiology

Get Access