ACFI 703
March 27, 2013
Hedging Currency Risks at AIF
The American Institute of Foreign Studies (AIFS) is a company that organizes student exchange programs worldwide with two main divisions. The College Division arranges academic years and semesters or summer schools. The High School Division organizes 1-4 week educational travels for students and teachers. More than 50,000 students participate each year in exchange programs of AIFS, which leads to annual revenues of around $ 200 million. AIFS receives most of its revenues in US-Dollars, whereas most of its costs incur in foreign currencies, mainly in Euros and British Pounds. This is why they use currency hedging in order to protect their bottom line.
The college division had
…show more content…
Cost is relatively high and leave no profit margin. They will loss $2,748,800. Sales volume is relatively low to drive the profit up. They had a windfall loss on volume totaling $3,366,000. Cost is higher than revenues.
The worst outcome for the sale of only 30,000 trips will be options at a exchange rate of 1.48, The expected loss is $541,400. The sale volume is too large and exchange rate is really weak. The gain from sale volume is not enough to cover the loss of weak currency.
8.
|25,000 Trips |1.234 |1.01 |1.48 |
|Cost(10,000 trips forward,
Net Loss – The combination of the operating gain and the non-operating loss produced a net loss of $51k compared to a budgeted loss of $22k. YTD operating and non-operating gains are $48k compared to a budget of $712k.
The most suitable costing method Yeltin should adopt is the practical capacity in order to remove the factor of uncertain budgeted sales figure. For this approach and the practical capacity of 65000-22000 units, then the revised overhead costs come out to be $30. With the inclusion of material and labor costs, the cost of the cartridge stand at $52 and the additional royalty expense of $10 raises the overall per unit cost to $62. The selling price of the cartridge is fixed at $150. With this selling price, the gross margin is equal to $88. The gross margin percentage is equal to 59%. In comparison to the budgeted volume, the gross margin has increased by 14%. See below
In our second assumption, instead of using the cost of goods per cases in 1986, we try to use the percentage it counts in the total expenses which is 50.4% and to find the sales needed to break-even. The detail of the calculation is shown in the answer for questions d. The result is that 95,635, a little bit higher than the estimated sales of 90,000.
• Net profit margin has been negative and no major patterns over the 9 year period on net profit since the trend of the industry is based mostly on economic factors, and whether or not they secure contracts. Due to high percentage of COGS they are only left with a net profit of $980 or
The revenue is $600,600*1.2= $720,720. The variable cost changes as sales increases and fixed cost stays the same, the gross profit is $175,500. After tax, the net income is $100,557.
The $320,000, on the other hand, is a fixed cost associated with the proposed addition.
Although the company made strategy through original cost system, it is still unclear why the profit was declining. Might be some problem when the company was allocating the cost on both lines, and the methods to allocate will route a wrong strategy for the company.
* Refer sheet “30000 Sales” for cost incurred and Gain/loss for AIFS for different scenarios and actual sales volume of 30000.
7. Overall, the increase in net loss was primarily due to the lower-than-expected sales price and the increase in both marketing and fulfillment expenses.
Compute the projected profit for the order quantities suggested by the management team under three scenarios: worst case in which sales = 10,000 units, most likely case in which sales = 20,000 units, and best case in which sales = 30,000 units.
All the future computations are in comparison with the “impact zero” scenario of a rate of USD 1,22/EUR and a volume of 25 000 sales. (Exhibit 2)
The internal sales data showed that the business would need $45,000 in monthly revenue to break even. The sales forecast which have been prepared keep in mind a 65% gross margin, however, based on actual figure for 2009, this target has not been reached, and the forecasted sales have fallen.
The goal of this case is to help Sandra Meyer develop a presentation to address Henry Bosse’s concerns about international investments. The general idea is to demonstrate to Henry the benefits of international diversification, if any. To achieve this goal, you need to have a view on 1) the impact of foreign exchange (FX) rates on the return and risk of international investments, and 2) the impact of having more assets on the return and risk of the investment portfolio To form views on these two points, answer the following questions: I. The impact of FX rates on the risk and return of foreign investments 1a) Using data in Appendix A, calculate the
Those expenses act as a natural hedge that decreases the total exposure of Aspen to foreign exchange risk. For its revenues and expenses, after “natural hedging”, the overall exposure of Aspen to foreign exchange risk is $9,484,000, with Belgium
There would still be a net loss in 2006 due to the increase of break-even point, which increased from $7,505 to $8,640.