Any act or condition varying from the norm assigned by a society’s value system is considered deviation regardless of which end of the spectrum it lies. By definition, being at the high end of the spectrum is just as deviant as being at the low end of the spectrum; however, the consequences differ. Like Heckert (1998) relates, positive deviance usually earns hero or achievement status along with geek/nerd labeling; consequently, the individual suffers fallout from this deviance on a different scale than the thief who earns criminal or convict status along with loser labeling at the other end of the spectrum. Either way, both types of deviant receive sanctions for their behavior outside of the norm expected in their particular society. The term …show more content…
Interestingly, some forms of positive deviance started in a negative light. Consider Jesus who was crucified for his role in society during his lifetime; however, today is worshipped as a charismatic leader who was unappreciated during his lifetime. Likewise, Martin Luther King met with horrific resistance, and is now considered one of the most charismatic and prolific leaders of his time. Their deviance from the societal norms cost them their lives, yet their ideology and value systems are foundational in today’s society. Additionally, there are many in the scientific community who through their intellectual brilliance brought us incredible scientific breakthroughs, but were received as crazy, crackpots who needed help rather than being recognized for their innate intelligence. Heckert described positive deviance as an altruistic lifestyle which is exemplified by Mother Teresa, as innate qualities inherited genetically and displayed in the athletic arena, and as “supra conformity” by the “straight A student” whose zealous achievement is highlighted in academia (1998). Heckert showed the supra conformist with innate intelligence brings innovative ideas to society, yet is sanctioned and ostracized for being a nerd/geek who is not understood by the society they are benefitting. Consequently, there are very negative and real consequences for stepping away from the norm with respect to society no matter which end of the spectrum the behavior and ideals
After reading the article “Defining Deviancy Down”, Daniel Patrick Moynihan was able to portray that certain acts that were deviant have eventually become “normal” over time. There has been many things that were seen as deviant when I was child, but has now become less deviant. With that in mind, it does not always mean that it will always benefit society as a whole.
This led to Becker to suggest that deviancy was the consequence of the application by others of rules and sanctions directed at an offender: the deviant was a person ‘to whom that label successfully been applied, deviant behaviour is behaviour that people so label’ (Becker, 1963:9)
In the 1998 film American History X, Derek Vineyard is paroled after serving 3 years in prison for brutally murdering two black men who were breaking into his truck. Through his Brother Danny’s narration of a paper he is writing, it is learned that Derek was the leader of a large Neo-Nazi group known as D.O.C., or Disciples of Christ, that committed many acts of racial crime throughout Los Angeles. During his time in prison Derek decides that hate is a waste of time after being violently raped by fellow white supremacists, and his only friend being a black man, who was only in prison for a misunderstanding. After getting out on parole, Derek learns that Danny is headed down the same racist path as him, and decided that he must put a stop to it. Throughout this film there are many examples of the five theories of deviance; Functional, Conflict, Labeling, Broken Windows, and Differential Association. From Derek’s initial exposure to racism, all the way to him deciding to change, all five theories are exemplified through Derek, Danny, their Father, Cameron, or the D.O.C. as a whole.
“Deviance in sociological context describes actions or behaviors that violate cultural norms including formally-enacted rules (e.g., crime) as well as informal violations of social norms.”
“Deviancy is not a quality of the act a person commits but rather a consequence of the application by others of rules and sanctions to an ‘offender’. Deviant behaviour is behaviour that people so label.”
Sociologists believe that deviance is the result of unsuccessful socialization. With this being said, it makes sense that deviance surrounds us because not everyone can be perfectly socialized to fit in civilization’s cookie cutter image. Those who cannot fit in tend to become deviant, where they then violate the norms of society. Once those norms are violated, they are labeled as deviant and will continue to become more deviant as others define them that way. Sociologists also believe that the
Deviance is the behavior and the standards of expectations of a group or society. It is also behavior that is considered dangerous, threatening or offensive. The people that are deviant are often labeled to be weirdos, oddballs, or creeps. In the United States, people with tattoos, drug addicts, alcoholics, and compulsive gamblers are all considered deviant. Sociologists believe that everybody is deviant from time to time. They believe each person will violate a social norm in certain situations. People are considered deviant if they don't stand for the national anthem at a sports event, dress casually to a fancy restaurant, or skip classes. One category of deviance is Crime. Crime is a violation of norms
The Three Main Theories of Deviance and Their Strengths and Weaknesses A functionalist analysis of deviance looks for the source of deviance in the nature of society rather than in the biological or psychological nature of the individual. Although functionalists agree that social control mechanisms such as the police and the courts are necessary to keep deviance in check, many argue that a certain amount of deviance can contribute to the well-being of society. Durkhiem (1895) believed that: * Crime is an 'integral part of all healthy societies'.
Advantage of Deviancy The advantages of the deviancy is that you are able to do and fight what you think is right or good for you and for others. Not every violations are wrong, there are just some things that other countries or culture don’t tolerate or accept like when women participate in public spaces in society was deviance but now it’s norm. Martin Luther King Jr. is an example of positive deviance because he supported or fought for his emphatic trust in love, justice, forgiveness and wisdom and because of him, the leaders opened their eyes, dropped their agendas and supported him. Disadvantage of Deviancy
‘social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitutes deviance, and by applying those rules to particular people and labelling them as outsiders. From this point of vie, deviance is not a quality of the act the person commits, but rather a consequence of the application by others of the rules and sanctions to an ‘offender’. The deviant is one to whom the label has successfully been applied, deviant behaviour is behaviour that people so label. (Becker 1963, pg 9)
Deviant behavior is an integral part of all healthy societies. Deviance also offers society members an opportunity to rededicate themselves to their social controls. Deviant behavior actually helps teach society's rules by providing illustrations of violation. Deviance might be functional to a group in that it causes the group's members to close ranks, prompts the group to organize to limit future deviance acts, helps clarify for the group what it really does believe in, and teaches normal behavior by providing examples of rule violation. Finally, in some situations, tolerance of deviant behavior acts to a safety valve and actually prevents more serious instances of nonconformity.
Deviance can be defined as an absence of conformity to the social norm. Not all deviant behavior is necessarily illegal or harmful to individuals, these behaviors can range from standing in another’s personal space to murdering another individual. In some cases, it can be looked upon as a positive change or a unique and favorable act. Although, considered deviant because it is not the social norm, it still can have a very positive social aspect or lead to social change. Culture and the societies within these cultures have a significant impact on what is considered deviant and what is acceptable or even lawful behavior. The degree of deviance is measured by society’s reaction towards the action and the lawful sanctions that may take
Positive deviance is the violation of societal norms in a positive manner. An individual may overconform or
Author of the 2002 Encyclopedia of Crime and Justice, Charles R. states that the word deviance is one that “usually refers to some behavior that is inconsistent with the standards of acceptable conduct prevailing in a given social group, although the term has also been used to designate personal conditions, ideas, or statuses that are stigmatized or disreputable” (p. 1). Assuming this ideal as fact, we must consider those who influence the change in behavior that is deemed “disreputable.” In order to understand this, the Nation must be observed in a large scale while searching for the persons that are most influential. In this way, we must designate which behaviors are considered deviant and how those influential people help those behaviors to be deemed so. Anything similar to gang activity, drug use, violence of any
According to Howard Becker’s labeling theory, ‘deviance is not a quality of the act person commits, but rather a consequence of the application by others of rules and sanctions to an “offender”.’ (Becker