The Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 (HHFK)
This a federal statute signed into law by President Barak Obama on December 13, 2010. The law funds child nutrition programs and free lunch programs in schools. It also increases access to healthy food for students and promotes overall student wellness. HHFKA also sets new nutrition standards of school breakfast and lunch, a focus of First lady Michelle Obama. (The Healthy Hunger Free Kids Act, 2010). The major goals of the law are to end childhood hunger, improve childhood nutrition, and combat America’s epidemic of obesity within school age children. HHFKA of 2010 will help end childhood hunger by expanding after school meals for at-risk children.
Background to HHFKA The law will improve childhood nutrition and reduce obesity by: establishing national nutrition standards for all foods sold in school during the school day, including a la carte lines and vending machines and strengthening local school wellness policies and school food safety programs. (United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Food and Nutrition Service, School
…show more content…
One very important example of trust between and adult and child is the providing of food that keeps the child healthy. This is somewhat similar to Maslow’s theory because if this basic need of trust is not fulfilled the child will not be able to develop to her potential as she gets older Erickson’s first developmental goal is trust versus mistrust and this theorist believes that if basic things like food are provided, the child will more than likely trust those around and feel safe in the world. (Crying Babies: Trust vs Mistrust and Erickson, April
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the federal Healthy, Hungry-Free, Kids Act 2010 (Public Law: 111-296), provide an overview of the literature, discuss the implementation process, evaluate the policy, and provide explanations for continued support, or provide rationale on why the program should end. The Healthy, Hunger-Free, Kids Act (HHFKA) currently awaits re-authorization, and funding by Congress. The HHFKA was originally included in the Congressional reauthorization process, of the original 1966 Child Nutrition Act, (CNA) which establishing several nutrition programs for school aged children. The CNA was introduced as part of President Johnsons’ “war on poverty” (Matthews, 2014). The Healthy, Hungry-Free, Kids Act 2010, set new
The title of Philip Roth’s novel, Goodbye, Columbus, is symbolic of the journey one must take to define one’s individuality or discover one’s life purpose. Superficially, the title is a reference to the ending lyrics of Ron’s senior yearbook album as well as the physical location of Ohio State University in which Ron Patimkin graduated from. With closer analysis, it becomes evident that the title extends to a much deeper meaning of the overall theme of self-examination and self-identity for the protagonist, Neil Klugman. The title, Goodbye, Columbus, primarily acts as an essential metaphor between the expedition Christopher Columbus takes in search of a westward route to India and the life journey Neil embarks upon to discover his identity both in terms of his socioeconomic status and Jewish heritage. The title both clarifies and foreshadows the fate Neil ultimately realizes as he pursues a relationship with Brenda Patimkin.
The Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 was passed in order to reauthorize child nutrition programs. It provides funding and sets policy for nutrition programs such as the National School Lunch Program, the School Breakfast Program, and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC). Each local agency that participates in the National School Lunch Program or other federal child nutrition program is required by law to establish a local school wellness policy for all schools under its jurisdiction.
Will The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act recently signed into law on December 13, 2010 by President Barack Obama be able to deliver healthier meals in the schools nutrition programs or will the bill overwhelm struggling school districts with additional unfunded mandates? Schools confront difficult issues on a daily basis that affect the learning ability of their students: struggling economic conditions, students from poor families, increased food insecurity across the country, and constant pressures to increase student performance. Providing healthy meals for children, who otherwise would eat poorly or not at all, is a necessity that our country has recognized and planned for many decades. Two measures authorized
For families less fortunate the new law allows kids to have a healthy lunch for a cheaper price! Parents who can't afford to buy healthy foods at home know their kids are eating/getting healthy foods at their school lunch. (A) The new law definitely is a great idea because it saves parents money and takes the stress off of parents’ backs. Another reason why this law is great for parents is because the parents don't have to worry about making their kids’ lunch in the morning. Instead the parents can go to work earlier because they don't have to have a concern on their kids diet or the day.(A) This determines that if a school does the healthy hunger free kids act parents can get to their job on time without a worry for their kids. The healthy hunger free kids act is a smart decision because it over all feeds more kids, and allows less fortunate kids to eat
The Child Nutrition and WIC Reauthorization Act (Public Law 108-265) was passed by Congress in 2004 (Corbin & McKenzie, 2008). The act requires all public schools, or schools with federal funding, to develop a wellness plan for the students (Corbin & McKenzie, 2008). The policy is attached to increase opportunities for nutrition, physical education and encouragement of better food choices outside of school boundaries (Virgilio, 2009). While the sentiment is clearly positive, whether or not it works or favors certain populations is unclear. The Child Nutrition Act guidelines are a model, since some schools are not adequately funded, other vendors come into play that do not have the best interests of our children at
In 2010, the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act (HHFKA) reauthorization was passed by a Democratic-controlled congress, adding the CEP (which allows schools to provide free meals to all students if 40% or more are eligible for FRP
Therefore, modifying the Healthy Hungry-Free Kids Act of 2010 is a great start to meeting the needs of a more diverse student body. In deciding to keep the program the same, active and athletic students leave school undernourished everyday. Consequently, students not receiving their nutritional needs could also quench their hunger with unhealthy alternatives. For example, they could choose to visit a gas station before a sport practice to get through the practice. A healthy lunch program is ineffective if, in effect, it causes students to consume more unhealthy alternatives. Overall, this either causes undernourished students or students indulging in unhealthy alternatives. Neither of these is a good outcome for the students health, it would more effective to offer a second serving of healthier food during
As of 2013, one sixth of the entire country was enrolled in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Through this program, 47 million Americans are given federal financial aid to purchase fresh groceries (Plumer). One of the highly debated provisions of the SNAP program is what participants should be allowed to use their food stamps for. As of right now, food stamps can only be used to purchase food that can be cooked or eaten at home, preventing families from spending the federal aid at restaurants (USDA). Recently, the fast food corporation YUM!, which owns Taco Bell, KFC, and Pizza Hut, has lobbied to change this restriction (USA Today). Should people benefitting from the SNAP program have the right to spend their money on
In the article about fixing kids lunches and diets is ,Besides the menu changes, the new law makes it easier for low-income and foster kids to have school meals.In the article it’s important to note that the goverment only sets guidelines,local
Ever since Obama has come into office school lunches have become healthier and more satisfying for the students of the country. The Obama administration has worked very hard to make school lunches both healthy and appealing. The, Healthy Hunger Kids Act of 2010 required the USDA to make significant nutrition improvements in school meals, as well as to improve the overall excellence of foods at schools. Proponents of the program, such as, Michelle Obama say that the 524 schools that have withdrawn amount to a drop in a bucket compared to the other 100,000 schools nationwide that are participating in the program.
Many kids around the world often play outside with each other; whether that be at a playground or in a back yard. Though, in America, the majority of young people own some type of electronic. Instead of burning calories playing outside, kids decide waste their energy playing games on their devices. According to the USA Today, “One of every three children in the United States is overweight or obese”(USA Today). With the population constantly growing, and the kids getting lazier and lazier, the numbers of obese children is only going to increase. The government can help America by changing kid’s diets. The only way the government can manage what kids consume is through school. Changing school’s lunch menus will be a great start, since many schools in the United States do not provide nutritious meals, In fact, the University of Washington asked a handful of middle schools and high schools to participate in a study. The study compared the meal standards before and after menu changes. The professors then calculated the meal standards using the meals’ adequacy ratio (MAR) and concluded, “The nutritional quality increased by nearly 30%, from a MAR of 58.7 before the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act to 75.6 after implementation”(Chen). The scientists achieved this drastic increase to the meals’ adequacy ratio just by providing a healthy variety of foods and reducing portion sizes.
According to Erikson’s first stage of development, “Trust vs. Mistrust” begins as soon as the infant is born. Erikson believe that when an infant is first born, they must learn how to trust others. In other words, their parents are the ones who are suppose to
In 2010, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), which works with Food & Nutrition Services to develop guidelines for the NSLP, proposed new regulations for school lunches in the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act (HHFKA). The rules included calorie guidelines according to age group and also outlined requirements for vegetable, fruit, protein, and starch components of the meals. While the USDA guidelines for meals were
How often do children who whine about eating their peas and carrots at the dinner table hear from their mothers, “You should appreciate the food on our table, there are starving kids in Africa.” Although parents use the preceding phrase as a guilt mechanism to trick their children into eating their veggies so they too can consume the vitamins and nutrients they need to grow, the reality behind the phrase is much deeper than most realize. People are starving in almost every part of the world and the solution to that problem has yet to be discovered. A solution that has been considered for some time now but recently has sparked more interest is the use of genetically modified foods to feed the hungry. Should genetically modified foods be