Gun Control And The American People

The gun law controversy has been a public debate for the past few decades. With the current state of the nation, it is not uncommon to see mass shooting occur in schools, churches, and in public. The most recent current events would illustrate the use of these weapons can cause massive death rates: the church in Texas being attacked by an individual with a domestic abuse history, the country concert event in Las Vegas, even the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting and the death of children who could not defend themselves. As onlookers watch these events unfold, ideas of creating more laws to regulate guns arise and a national push for legislation to act is engaged. Countering this movement are those who would oppose more laws as the fear that rights would be trampled, and personal safety removed. The answer to this heated debate of strict gun control laws is not to take them away; they are put into place with the intent to govern the safety of our society.

The second amendment, a now widely talked about topic. With recent issues in society, this amendment has become controversial. This amendment states “A well regulated militia, be necessary to the security of the free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This amendment was ratified in 1791 and is in the original bill of rights. In colonial America, before its ratification, the right to bear arms was considered a necessary due to their believed nature right to protect themselves and their property. However, there was a need to declare gun ownership as a specific right. This amendment have proven itself important to American from the beginning. At first, it prevented the new federal government from

The second amendment was written in 1791. This amendment was added along with nine others in the Bill of Rights. This specific amendment gives a person the right to keep and bear arms. Ever since this amendment was added there have been debates on whether this was a good or bad idea. Both sides held valid points on the matter. Personally, I believe this amendment was a good idea, but requires some boundaries and limitations.

The debate over whether the United States should have stricter gun laws has become a major talking point in our society. However, the clear choice that will bring the most prosperity and security to our country is to maintain the current gun control laws as they are the best option for the USA’s modern society. We must not let the rush to judgement after every shooting spree cloud our minds and glaze over all the benefits and lifestyles that guns let us take for granted. Society must also see what the outcomes are for the other options suggested and to not make the wrong choice and have to live with the consequences. We must not let the government enact laws that would place stricter controls on guns.

Ever since the Second Amendment was established, it has become one of the most important rights for a citizen today. In 1789, James Madison outlined the Bill of Rights, adding in the Second Amendment. Initially, it was meant to offer security to anti-federalists who feared that the government might extract too much power. Contrary to popular belief, the Second Amendment is not granting the people the right to bear arms, but instead works as a reminder for the government that it is a natural right for the people. Today, the Second Amendment reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (Acosta).

The second amendment was passed by congress on september 25,1789. This amendment gave the right of the people to keep and bear Arms. The Second Amendment guarantees American citizens the right to self-protection and safety. Society is safer when citizens carry guns because it gives citizens the ability to protect themselves from threats like criminals, such as violent intruders and attackers, as well as violent shooters.

The Second Amendment provides U.S. citizens the right to bear arms. Ratified in December 1791, the amendment says: “A well regulated

The second amendment of United States constitution said “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. This amendment was embraced on December 15, 1791, taking in consideration that American citizens have a natural right to self-defense and they can help to accomplish the following purposes:

In 1791, the Second Amendment was adopted as part of the Constitution’s Bill of Rights, stating “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free

The second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Since December 15, 1971 people in America have had the right to bear arms, today that amendment is

Gun control has been an ongoing issue that has been debated about numerous times in Congress. Over the years, the seriousness of the issue has increased drastically since some recent events. When the Columbine High School massacre occurred in April 20th, 1999, gun control was beginning to become a heated topic to discuss about. Then, 13 years later another mass shooting occurred in Newtown, Connecticut on December 14th, 2012. This one was one of the worst shootings in American history. This increased the intensity of the debate and was one of the most talked topics by Congress during the few months shortly after. To limit any sort of tragedy from occurring, we need to stress gun control. Gun control should be implemented since it will likely,

The Second Amendment was ratified to the US Constitution on December 17, 1791 by Congress. The Second Amendment states “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The Second Amendment draws its influence and roots back to the English Bill of Rights of 1689. The English Bill of Rights was established to give an individual a natural right of self-defense. The English Bill was born in order to resolve two major conflicts. One of the two issue during the time of English politics, was the power the King of England had, in which he could govern the country and empire without the permission of Parliaments. The Second Issue was the powerful influence and role of the Catholics. King James II of England had stripped its citizens mainly Protestants the right to bear arms. King James II also wanted to keep a permanent army. The bill would be

The second amendment stated that American citizens had the right to bear arms. Congress passed this amendment on September 25, 1789. Congress ratified this amendment on December 15, 1791.

Gun Control in the United States of America is a sensitive (understatement) topic that has resulted in various criticism and support by many citizens of the United States (also an understatement). Some citizens believe that the guns don 't kill people; it is the people that kill people while others believe that guns lead to violence and a feeling of control and power over others. The belief of some is that if firearms were to be eliminated from the public, gun-related violence and death would face a heavy decrease throughout country. These two very different views force the federal government into an incredibly tight spot, the decision on whether or not to abolish one of our Constitutional rights

There are new proposed gun control laws in the aftermath of the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newton, Connecticut that occurred on December 14th, 2012. This incident claimed the lives of twenty 1st graders and six adults and has set the government in motion to try to prevent future acts of violence by strengthening gun control laws in the United States (Smith). This has been a topic that has been an extremely emotional debate with people on both sides unwilling to compromise. Gun advocates and critics of the new proposed gun laws argue that these new laws infringe on our constitutional