Gun control is very controversial issue in the US. Gun control is one of the main political topics because people are divided on the issue , especially after many mass shootings in the past decade. However, gun control issue became less argued topic. According to Charles et al ., (2009) , “Among a long list of issues facing the American public, guns are third only to gay marriage and abortion in terms of people who report that they are ''not willing to listen to the other side.''.
Should the nation have more strict laws and legislation about people owning guns? Would the new laws will help to decrease the number of mass shootings throughout the nation? I strongly believe that government should have more strict laws. Gun control does not mean that the government is going to outlaw guns but they will have better laws to ensure that citizens remain safe. Also, one of the advantages of gun control is that is will stop bad people from using weapons for to threat people since
…show more content…
For Also, they believe that there view of gun control issue will preserve American’s Second Amendment right for people, which states that people have the right to keep and bear arms. Some people think that the republicans view about gun control can lead to many problems like using guns for illegal purposes like robbing and threatening people. According to Burrus (2015) “
The gun murder rate in America is 20 times the average for developed countries, and we react to this with a mixture of confusion and shame”. The Republicans understand the consequences of gun violence and they believe in an honest conversation about firearms to reduce the crime rates. Also, President Trump hope to expand gun ownership rights and he wants to improve some gun laws to be more flexible for the current situation in the US and to increase safety in the country ( CNN.com, ,April 28
Countless opinions have been broadcasted on national news media regarding what society ought to do about gun control. This controversial topic sparks many heated debates with people of either position reluctant to compromise. Gun supporters claim that the proposed gun laws infringe on their constitutional right to bear arms. Conversely, others believe that restricted gun access would cause gun violence to decrease. Regardless of what side one stands on, with the increase in gun violence, it is safe to say that something must be done.
Because of many incidents involving handguns, and any other type of gun, the government has been trying to push a gun ban law. As a result of this rumor and possible law, there have been numerous outbursts of support and resistance. Some people believe that banning firearms would be a benefit to our nation’s safety and its population’s safety, while others oppose this proposal and say that guns are not the ones that need to be controlled, people should be the ones that are controlled. During this decision, people from different organizations have expressed their own views and thoughts. Gun control has both positive and negative effects on U.S. citizens.
Gun control is a topic that is heavily debated in our country and has been for a while. Since the ratification of our Constitution, the 2nd amendment has been interpreted very fluidly from many different groups and people. Ranging from the National Rifle Association who believes that our 2nd amendment right should not be restricted at all, to our current president Barack Obama, who believes the process of obtaining a gun needs to be stricter.
Gun control is one of the most controversial issues talked about in today’s society. Some people believe that if we take guns away from civilians then there will be less violence in the county. Others think that it is our right to bear arms. President Obama is trying to pass laws to enforce stricter gun laws, because he believes that one of the biggest problems in American is that too many people are able to have guns.
Gun control a very heated debate in the u.s. Many people want to take away all fire arms from everyone. This is not a very good solution because the people not allowed to have fire arms still will be able to obtain them how they have always obtained them illegally. Leaving the ordinary citizens defense less to the criminals with fire arms and the government. We must take fire arms out of the wrong hands and leave them in the right hands. Doing this would mean not allowing criminals with a past of violent crimes obtain guns or have a menatally ill person obtAIN A FIRE ARM. iN DOING THIS WE WILL SEE A DRAMATIC CHANGE IN FIRE ARM VIOLENCE.
Throughout the history of the United States of America there has been debate on gun control. The debate has become even more relevant as more semi-automatic assault rifles are being sold and the amount of shootings we have been having, especially in this last month. There are a variety of views one can take on this argument. Many conservatives have been saying that more gun control is not necessary as it’s not the guns killing the people, it’s the people pulling the trigger that are killing innocent lives. On the other hand, people who are more liberal would like to see legislation passed that would put control on the sale of firearms as keeping weapons out of the hands of dangerous people who will willingly pull the
Of all the developed countries, the United States has overall the highest per capita rate of gun homicides. In the year 2015, Americans witnessed 372 mass shootings, and somehow it has become “normal”. The topic of gun control has been a huge debate for some time. Earlier this year, President Obama implemented executive actions on gun control, ultimately aiming to lower the gun violence and deaths occurring every day. However, this topic of debate will not be over anytime soon, that would mostly be due to the strong lobbying group the NRA having influence on Congress, and gun right activists.
Gun control is the effort to restrict or limit the possession and use of guns. The gun control debate may be one of the most important issues in our society. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2008 that the 2nd Amendment restrains the government’s ability to ban handguns. Some politicians are passionate about gun control and make voting decisions based upon on this issue alone; hence, the people we elect into office directly affect our lives. A few republican politicians have a strong belief in the right to own guns. This battling contradiction can sometimes make it difficult to approach the issue reasonably. The arguments have different statistics and facts regarding how firearms can impact society. It is important to realize
Few topics can generate more of a divided opinion than gun control. In reviewing the following case study, “Case 8.4: Have Gun, Will Travel…to Work”, several important questions will be discussed involving moral and legal rights of both the employee and the employer. This case involves the dilemma of a company’s rights to protect its employee’s verses an individual’s right to bear arms. In 2002 several employees were terminated for violating company policy by keeping guns in their vehicles while at work. Although at the time there was no state or federal law prohibiting the company from dismissing an employee for having a gun in their vehicle, this action by Weyerhaeuser, a Seattle-based timber-producing company set in motion a legal
What a better topic to choose than gun control in America. With so many incidents of mass shootings on American soil, is disgraceful. The most recent one at the Texas church, I definitely think the government has to take actions and do something about it. There are so many sick people out there and all they want is to harm innocent people and we cannot control it unless the government comes with a plan. In my opinion, I think social media is a major factor as well due to the fact that nowadays everything gets recorded and uploaded online. The news is another major factor because we do not know when they are reporting the truth or lying to get more attention from the viewers. If we all take a step back and compare with the rest of the world,
Arms, shall not be infringed.” The government has no right to change the amendment and placing a ban and enforcing stricter regulations is yet another invasion of our liberty. By placing restrictions on gun ownership, citizens will feel insecure and more defenseless. FBI crime statistics show that more people are murdered by clubs and hammers than rifles and shotguns. This statement would
Gun control is a highly controversial topic, which sparks debate. Some believe that gun laws should be tightened, whereas others believe that they should be laxed. The issue has been longstanding and discussed by many politicians. Although there is no definitive answer, many people feel strongly about each side. There are many subtopics that are also heavily debated within themselves such as the history of gun control, the interpretation of the Second Amendment, the use of silencers, the purpose of guns, and discrimination.
Since the beginning of time humans have employed the use of weapons. These have been used as a tool to provide food, security and sometimes to cause harm or as a final resolution to conflict. The loss of life that sometimes involves the use of guns has prompted the Authorities to enact certain regulations that are generally known as gun control laws.
One of the most debated topics in the world today is the conflicting belief on whether people should or should not own and use guns. Gun control is generally defined as “laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms” (Gopink, 2012). The views and opinions of this situation vary across the world. Some territories set strict rules and difficult procedures to obtain weapons while others allow easy access. People are usually very opinionated about this subject, causing debates and conflicting reactions. Gun control is one of the most controversial topics with numerous approaches to how it should be handled.
The controversial issue of gun control is one of the most debatable topics among politicians and civilians alike. This is because of the complexity of gun control and the long history that is related to the subject. Gun control is typically an effort, by the government, to create legislation that regulates the sale and use of firearms within the country. There are various arguments that surround this topic which include gun-related violence, accidents, self-defense, murders, suicide, constitutional rights, and so on. James Q. Wilson, a professor who has taught at Pepperdine University, Harvard University, and the University of California, Los Angeles, and a published author of several books, take a negative stance on the subject of gun control. Wilson contributed to the gun control debate in the last few years with his written op-ed article. According to Wilson, there is no possible method to eradicate the hundreds and millions of guns that exist within the country, restrictive gun laws will not significantly affect the United States’ murder rate, and that guns play an important role in self-defense in everyday lives. Contrary to what Wilson believes, strict gun control is necessary and should be enforced to ensure public safety because gun laws have the power to produce a positive outcome in the long run, reduce gun-related violence, and reduce the numerous risks that gun ownership open.