1.) Grade inflation seems to cheapen the grades earned by any student.
Some students might not try as hard as they could for grades because they know they will get a good grade.
Many students feel a course is not worth taking if they do not get an A or B.
Employers might not take degrees or coursework seriously when considering applicants from certain institutions over others.
If the grades are too easily obtained then anyone can pass, if grading practices are too tough good students can look bad.
2.) If I was a Princeton student I would not support this policy because I feel a professor should grade the work they assign in the way they deem fair and applicable.
Policy can state that departments can pre-approve a professor's grading practices
Education is a long-term investment. We, as students, work hard to acquire knowledge and to hone our skills so that we may use them one day. The effort we put into a single assignment should be considered as both for that specific assignment and for our rounding as complete, educated individuals. And with this mindset, students should be motivated even more to put more effort and hard work into academics, with the goal of bettering themselves for the future and advancing their prospects as individuals. And with this hard work and effort will come progress, and this progress should be reflected in the grading—not necessarily on individual assignments, but on the student’s education as a
Grades tend to be more hurtful than anything. They have negative effects on students and how they learn. Cheating can become a series problem even with students who normally wouldn’t cheat. “Researchers have found that the more students are
Alfie Kohn discussed multiple fabulous points in his article, “Degrading to De-Grading”. The author suggests more effective ways to assess students’ progress other than numerical or letter grades. Kohn goes into detail about why our current grading system is flawed. Grades can cause students to lose interest in learning which causes them to stop taking challenges. If students are not engaged and interested than they are not retaining the information they are being taught. The grading system can also cause students to develop unhealthy competition with one another for instance, “I got a better grade than you!”. Indeed, grades are a wonderful concept, but they tend to be more hurtful than helpful. In some cases, grades can have positive effects on students. For example, setting goals for various assignments, or receiving help where they are struggling. Though, there are alternatives that could make positive changes in the system.
course, and some of them do not pass. Research indicates that 40% of the students do
In “The Dangerous Myth of Grade Inflation”, Alfie Kohn explores the phenomenon behind grade inflation. Whether it is complaints or just the general idea that such an undesired occurrence has routinely taken place, Kohn certainly explores them all. He begins with addressing that the issue has not just transpired, but has been in existence over time as many have complained periodically. As Kohn notes on page 261, grade inflation is recognized as a poor occurrence, yet Kohn reveals the struggle as “truly substantive issues surrounding grades and motivation have been obscured or ignored.” Why is this so? Kohn goes on to explore the issue through some evidence and research, but finds that while grades have become higher more recently than before, that still does not prove inflation exists behind the rise in grades (261). By this Kohn reveals a trend to the reader with the facts, or lackthereof, behind grade inflation.
Many teens are facing challenges with being accepted into college because some high schools across the United States do not have weighted grade point averages. Nor do they have equal grading scales. Although some schools follow this code, some do not, and that is unfair to students who take more challenging classes. Along with that, there are many other pros to this situation. For example, according to high school Superintendent Jack Thompson, “The pro of a weighted grading system is an effort to kind of give value to what we would consider a more rigorous class” (qtd. in Bonchak).
School is slave labor. Rather than enjoying or learning from their classes, students are forced to do useless work that will often be forgotten immediately. Grades are meant to show much a student understands a class, but instead are used as a scale of how well a student can regurgitate answers onto a test. Students only work for good grades because of the threat of being punished for failure, and the promise of reward for passing. The punishments in this case are detention or trouble from teachers, and the rewards are making the honor roll or getting bragging rights. The real reward for learning should be having new knowledge, but this is not taken into consideration. Jerry Farber, a professor at U.S.D, made the strong claim that grades are useless and harmful in his essay, “A Young Person’s Guide to the Grading System.” I wholeheartedly agree with Farber’s objection to our current grading system.
In the past colleges like Princeton and Wellesley have tried to adopt policies to help curb grade inflation. Even though it lowered the percentages of high grades, effectively lowering the amount of grade inflation, it came with the cost of unforeseen consequences that affected the students and staff. In his article Rojstaczer
In “The Dangerous Myth of Grade Inflation,” Alfie Kohn sets out to determine if grade inflation is indeed fact or fiction. The opening quotes provided by two professors at Harvard University separated by over century has most definitely peaked my interest. It had me questioning whether or not these professors are holding our education system to a “Harvard” standard or is their actually truth to their statements; that feigned students are indeed submitting “sham work” (Bergmann, 260). Kohn goes onto indicate that: “To say that grades are not merely rising but inflated—and that they are consequently ‘less accurate’ now, as the American Academy’s report puts it-is to postulate the existence of an objectively correct evaluation of what a student (or essay) deserves” (Bergmann, 263). To theorize grade-inflation is to question the judgment and teaching of all the previous and future educators of America. It also raises the question of why has not there any concert data to support this claim. Why is our educational system delaying this investigation since this concern has been around for years? Especially, now that grade inflation is starting to gain more momentum.
One example demonstrating that grades lead to limited learning of material, can be illustrated by a study that was conducted of students, some of whom were graded. One group of students was told about being graded and the other group was not. The group who was “told they’d be graded on how well they learned a social studies lesson had more trouble understanding the main point of the text than did students who were told that no grades would be involved” (Kohn). This experiment shows how students concerned getting a good grade detracts from the students overall understanding. In my experience, students have so much homework, activities, and pressure to excel that it becomes challenging to learn topics outside of those being assigned. For example, in order to complete history worksheets, students do not always read the passages to find the answers, but rather skim the passage for keywords
It is no question that students in recent years have been receiving higher grades than in previous years. The most frequently awarded letter grade in the nation is currently an A, given 43% of the time. However, people are questioning whether today’s students have actually gotten smarter. These higher grades could be due to grade inflation. Grade inflation is defined as the tendency to award progressively higher academic grades for work that would have received lower grades in the past. Although it is known that grades have been rising, it is questionable what the true reason is.
Traditional grades have been used to accurately measure student abilities for decades now, and they are the only thing recognized by colleges. Actual grades are the most important things that are considered, and unless that changes, we have to stay that way (Bull)., and unless Basically, the 1-4 system used for SBG isn’t accepted by colleges, because they want actual grades, not kindergarten stuff. This would be a gigantic problem for students who want to go to college, colleges don’t care if a student gets solid
If students cannot check their grades, they don’t know which classes or assignments that they are doing well or poorly in. They also don’t know whether or not they are missing assignments. Because of this, students may become stressed or anxious about their grades, even if they are doing well. They will not know
When it comes to a single letter grade people including myself just want to get the highest grade they can to achieve. But when it comes to a hard class I don’t want to put forth the effort in getting the grade. I want to go for the easy class and grade that I don’t have to work hard for. It shouldn’t be like that you should be able to want to achieve at something because you want it bad enough. Not just go for the easy grade.
In sports, analysts examine a players skills and abilities through the use of personal records and game statistics. Similarly, grades reflect a student's strength and weakness in the classroom. In Paul Goodman’s excerpt entitled “A Proposal to Abolish Grading,” he argues that Ivy League Universities should abolish grades. His reasons are that students focus on passing a test more than they do on expanding their education. Eliminating grading standards will allow students to learn new material without being stressed. Goodman's main focus is on prestigious schools, but it is an issue that concerns every school. For it begs the question if grades are necessary to measure a student's inclination to learn. Goodman believes that today’s students