1. Why was the building of the dam first proposed in 1919 and by whom?
The dam was first proposed by Sun-Yat San, the father of modern China, in order to protect river communities from floods and also contribute for economic development plan for China.
2.Why have archaeologists and historians criticized the building of the Three Gorges Dam?
Archeologist and historians criticize the building of the Three Gorges Dam because it is socially and environmentally destructive. This is because when the dam is finished, nearly 2 million people will have been displaced and 4000 villages, 140 towns, and 13 cities will have been swallowed up. Also, monuments, and priceless archeological discoveries of this countries culture will be lost
…show more content…
In addition, farmland has been destroyed because of the floods and the decrease in delta sediment. The dam has reduced downstream nutrients and sediment flow. And has seriously impacted neighboring river and seacoast ecosystems.
10. Although. Over a million people have been displaced by the dam already. What is the future forecast for local citizens? Is the social turmoil over yet?
Many local citizens have not been given their compensation for moving because of the dam. In addition, much of the money the government promised has also been embezzled. Therefore, many people will probably not be given their compensation in the future. The social turmoil is still not over yet because the people who have been displaced were not given as much fertile soil as promised. This causes many farmers to be making less, then the amount they made in their original homes.
11. What was an important economic goal associated with the building of the Three Gorges Dam?
The economic goal was to create more and cleaner power. In addition, they wanted the Three Gorges Dam to improve shipping.
12. How does the Three Gorges Dam improve Yangtze River trade?
The Three Gorges Dam allows larger ships to travel the river, improving
In the ¨River Restoration Project Offers a Sprinkling of Hope¨, Ron Jacobsma, general manager of the Friant Water Authority, said “We hope to get double duty out of that water by taking it the long way around.¨ As Jacobsma is a general manager of the Friant water Authority, this offers us his experience, his ideas and his thoughts of how we can have hope for the project. President Barack Obama signed the Omnibus Public Lands Bill in March, the agreement turned into federal law when he signed it. The parties had been working on the restoration plan for more than two years laying the groundwork for the physical changes to come. When the president signed it, it made them get the approval which he supported for them to continue the process. The credibility of the author right has now been believable because he provided us with the ethics of President Obama and Jacobsma. The river will not necessarily end up to its full, natural path along its entire length. Too much has changed in the decades since the dams construction. They would use canals along some stretches to carry the water short distances and to ferry the salmon upstream. This is showing us logos with facts and information it offers an explanation on how to solve one of the problems with the plan. A professor named Peter Moyole, from UC Davis also had his opinion on the project. He said “We have never done anything on this scale”, but we were willing to try it and approve of the
Beside these arguments, there is also a more quantitative side to the debate. The ecological detriments of the Glen Canyon Dam have been well-documented. Extensive changes were brought about in the Colorado River ecosystem by the construction of the Glen Canyon Dam. Most of these alterations negatively affected the functioning of the system and the native aquatic species of the river. The reduced supply and transport of
Easy navigation and flood control encouraged trade along the river, which boosted the economy and led to an increase in jobs for traders, deckhands, etc. (US History TVA). In addition to providing increased trade opportunities, large amounts of money that would have been spent on the flood damage that were saved by the construction of these dams. A few years into the program, stations were created in the area to monitor flooding. Reports from these stations, in addition to computer calculations, show that the total cost of the flood damage up until 2007 would have been $5.8 billion (TVA River Neighbors). The flooding would have destroyed not only people’s homes, but also their businesses and livelihoods., which would have led to further unemployment.
Studies before the dam removal have shown that 83% of the Olympic National Park has been untouched and is still considered a pristine wildlife habitat which is good news. This means that if the lower end from the dams and below can restored then the Elwha River ecosystem theoretically will recover as well. Of the lower 5 miles that was left available for fish spawning, not very much of it was usable. The dams cause a baseline shift in the lower river by changing the composition of the river bed from fine sediment to larger stones and boulders which is not prime spawning habitat for fish. The negative effects of the dams, both indirect and direct,
Large dams and reservoirs contribute a vast amount advantages in satisfying the basic fundamental needs of humans. Some of the advantages of large dams and reservoirs are they bear the responsibility for bringing water to businesses as well as drinking water; they are responsible for irrigation; they control floods; they supply economical hydropower and they offer hobbies for humans. Dams and reservoirs
ilson Dam- located in my hometown of Florence, Alabama- is a hydroelectric power-generating dam within the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) system. It was built within the time frame of 1918 to 1924, and its construction was initiated by the events of World War I. Nitrate was a commodity in high demand for its use in explosives, and as the government began to fear a decreasing supply of the substance, the National Defense Act of 1916 was passed which authorized the construction of new nitrate plants. Two such plants were to be built within the Muscle Shoals area, and thus a hydroelectric facility was needed to power the plants. Consequentially, the Tennessee River was selected as the best suited development site for the project.
Traditionally, environmental management has been considered in the light of knowing the best technological solution. A significant case study representing a technological solution to environmental management is the Three Gorges Dam (TGD) on the Yangtze River in China. The dam has two principal management purposes. These are; to provide energy sourced by more renewable means than coal burning alternatives, to meet rising demands, as well as reduce flooding of the Yangtze River. Following a deeper introduction of the TGD case study, four primary perspectives will be used to assess the environmental management outcomes and approaches. First the social implications and any gains of the project, including the issues of social injustice and lack
The Three Gorges Dam was the biggest dam ever built. With a structure that large and costly, there must have been some problems, but the dam has a lot of important benefits. After comparing all the pros and cons of the Three Gorges Dam for all perspectives I believe building the dam was worth it. This is because the pros like saving lives, stopping air pollution, creating tourism, and uncovering thousands of artifacts outweigh cons like relocation, creating water pollution, needing to borrow money, and losing ancient sites.
Historical Implications: Why have archaeologists and historians criticized the building of the Three Gorges Dam? Answer: the Three Gorges Dam because it flooded and destroyed a large number of important cultural and archaeological sites. The dam has caused a lot of ecological changes and approximately 1.3 million people had to move because of the creation of this dam. 3. Governmental Implications: What has been the unfortunate response of local government officials assigned to help families affected by the construction
The Three Gorges Dam is an unfinished project which will be the largest dam ever constructed on the planet Earth. It is situated in China on the third largest river in the world – the Yangtze. The dam has been debated over since the 1919 and is still a hot topic of debate because of its many pros and cons. In 1994 construction began on the dam, and it is expected to be finished by the year 2009. The massive dimensions of the dam are mind boggling and its functions – if the dam actually works – are truly remarkable; however, with such a large structure also comes difficulties, sacrifices, and cynics. The goal of this essay is to lend an understanding of the dam itself, the prospective benefits of
For example, due to the amount of water released to flood the land the water levels have plummeted causing severe droughts throughout the river. In the article Three Gorges Dam is Said to Hurt Areas Downstream it clearly states, “Large areas of central and southern China are suffering from the worst drought in 50 years, and the levels have plummeted in the the Yangtze River and other bodies of water.” This river is very important to China and if it completely dried up that would be a large threat to this country's society. To continue, the dam has been unsuccessful to measure the effects on other water bodies. This has presented the other rivers around the dam with lower water levels. In the article it says, “A Chinese official says the planners of the Three Gorges Dam failed to properly gauge its effects on lakes and other water bodies. As a result, the dam has contributed to lower water levels in two of China’s largest freshwater lakes…” Due to this not only will there be negative impacts for the dam the rivers will be affected too by droughts and the possibility to dry up completely. The last case of environmental effects being harmful is the impact and rapid growth of fish and plant species. According to the text it says, “In addition, the dam has had an impact of fish breeding and the growth
First, the Mosul Dam plays in many vital roles for many of us, Iraqis. The Mosul dam provides not only water, but also electricity to 1.7 million Iraqis. There are clearly possibilities of the dam collapsing if other countries around the world like Baghdad and the U.S.A are concerned with the situation. On top of that, the engineers involved in building the dam 30 years ago have warned that the risk of it collapsing could be even worse, and could happen
The man-made sea created by the dam would submerge important archaeological sites, some dating as far back as the Paleolithic Age. Thousands of invaluable relics, ancient burial sites, 200,00 year old fossils, and new information of a little known, obscure people known as the Ba will be lost (Topping, 1996). Even though $37.5 million has been "earmarked for the rescue of archaeological sites threatened by the dam's construction" (Childs-Johnson, 1996), only "ten to twenty percent of these treasures could be saved." (Topping, 1996). Estimates range from $180 million to $360 million to save ten percent of the most important sites and monuments. The Chinese government is expecting these archaeologists to do work that normally requires hundreds of years within ten years. There is simply not enough money or manpower to salvage many of these invaluable cultural
According to the Cobuild Advanced Learning Dictionary, a dam is defined as, A wall that is built across a river in order to stop the water flowing and to make a lake.” The Hoover Dam is located in the Colorado River between Arizona and Nevada. It was first called the Boulder Dam but was later named the Hoover Dam. It was named after President Herbert Hoover. Hoover was not only president but also an engineer, and when he was Secretary of Commerce (before being President) he urged the construction of the dam. The dam is 726 feet tall and is about 1200 feet wide.
In the Tigris River, the Ilisu Dam along with other dams has become a plan to sustain a water reservoir for the citizens of Turkey. Unfortunately, it has led to an increasing number of ecological impacts downstream. The project began in August of 2006 and has been met with much controversy, yet certain instances of how the dam affects the surrounding life including people and other organisms has become definite. With International Environmental Impact Assessments calling to be revised, but to no avail, it begins to make one investigate the risks of the construction of the dam and it’s ecological impact on the surrounding environment including aquatic, terrestrial, plant, and human life. This analysis will discuss what the Ilisu Dam is and