Glo 3 Interpreting Population Essay

In 1980 China introduced the one-child policy to save it from a famine. In 1980 China had a fertility rate of 2.7 children per women that lived in China. Document B states, “The claim by Chinese officials that the one child policy has helped avert 400 million births simply cannot be substantiated by facts.” The fertility rate means the number of children a women has in her lifetime. Since 1980, China's one child policy is helping

The one child policy only hurt China more due to its lowering fertility rate prior to the policy. “China had already achieved a remarkable fertility reduction, halving the number of children per women from 5.8 in 1970 to 2.7 in 1979.” (Document B) The facts shown here show that the policy was not necessary. In addition, since the population was already going

We will be talking about how the one child policy wasn't a good idea, the population going down at 3%, more men being born than women, and children being lonely. The one-child policy was implemented in 1997 to help reduce China's growing population. Before the one child policy was set in place, China's population was already going down by 3%. "China had already achieved a remarkable fertility reduction, having the number of children per woman from 5.8 in 1970 to 2.7 in 1997. " Document B.

In countries without a forceful and costly policy like China’s, birth rates have declined with similar trajectories and magnitude." This evidence supports the claim that the one-child policy was a bad policy because it didn't have any notable effects on China's fertility rate. The one-child policy was completely unnecessary because it did not make any positive changes. If China had never implemented the one-child policy and instead tried to figure out what other countries such as Brazil, South Korea, and Thailand did to get their fertility rates so low, their fertility rates would most likely be right where they want it at. This is how China's one-child policy had no notable impact on their fertility rate, and why it was an unnecessary policy to

China’s One-Child Policy has been a controversial topic since its implementation back in 1979. Forcing families to have only one child has caused major repercussions that have only been magnified with each generation. In the past thirty years, major unforeseen problems have arisen. The policy had appeared to be a viable solution to curb China’s massive population before it was put into effect, but now the problems with the policy clearly overshadow the benefits. When China faced the problem of a swelling population, rapidly approaching one billion (Doc A), the One-Child Policy appeared to be a good idea.

While china One child Policy was aimed for improvement, the policy has caused some serious social consequences. The New England Journal of Medicine 's article "The Effect of China 's One-Child Family Policy after 25 Years" discuss the social consequences of Chinas One child policy. The One child policy in china begin when Chinese governments viewed population containment as a benefit for living and economic improvement. They created a one child policy that limits the size of families, the policy also includes regulations regarding marriage, spacing and childbearing. The strict policy is controlled with rewards and penalties, it applies to minorities of china which are Urban residents and government employees with the exception of one-child families, first children with disabilities and workers in high-risk work settings. The policy three social consequences concerning population growth, the ratio between men and women, and the ratio between adult children and dependent elderly parents. Each social consequences causes disastrous results. The policy is a sex imbalance that creates social consequences. The sex imbalance is what causes the different social consequence with undesirable effects. The first social consequence is decrease in population growth. Population growth in china has declined in the past 25 years. The policy has prevented many births as stated in the article " Chinese authorities claim that the policy has prevented 250 to 300 million births. The total

In conclusion, the standard of living and the economy of China before the one-child policy was not better off after the policy was enforced and to some extent, it can be said that the policy helped steer the economy of China in the desired direction, considering how far she has come within the world today. The disadvantages of overpopulation are numerous and some of it’s compound problems immeasurable. China before the one-child policy had just cause to view overpopulation as a serious threat. The one-child policy provided China with a way to prevent the impending population explosion. At the time, it was the only solution that had concrete evidence it would actually work at controlling the rate of population growth based on the limitations

The final reason that the one-child policy was a bad idea is because of the fact that China’s fertility rate was already decreasing and was one of the lowest rates compared to Brazil, South Korea, and Thailand in 1979 making the policy pointless and unnecessary. “The claim by the Chinese officials that the one child policy has helped avert over 400 million births simply cannot be substantiated by

There has been a long history of China’s one child policy, since it was first introduces in 1979 by a Chinese Leader Deng Xiaoping (Rosenberg n.p). The law was meant to be temporary and used to control the population; however it is still in use today (Rosenberg n.p). When the policy was first enforced, it only

In October 12, 1999, the world's population has reached to 6 billion people. about only 12 years later (October 31, 2011) the world has gone up to 7 billion. Many people on the planet are worried about the world population going too high. They fear that too many people would result in starvation and quick depletion of resources. Some people believe that we should have some type of law that would limit the number of children we can have in each family. Something similar has come true in China about 30 years ago. In September 25, 1980, China's One-Child Policy has been created. This policy keeps parents from having more than one baby with the exception of twins, triplets, quadruplets, and so on. Parents may also have

Since 1980, China has made its people the subject of an intrusive and unfair, One Child Policy. This policy was the result of Chinese officials becoming worried of the countries jump in population from 1960 to 1980 causing a widespread lack of resources, so they decided to induct a law that would make force Chinese citizens to be limited to one child. Because of this controversial policy the question has been raised, did the one child policy positively or negatively effect China? The one child policy did negatively effect China and its people, because it resulted in gender discrimination, unjust punishments and was unnecessary due to the already declining fertility rate.

In the article Overpopulation Is Still the Problem, Alon Tal (2013) claims that overpopulation remains the number one problem facing the world today and discusses various problems and possible solutions. Tal unveils the falsely assuring news stories refuting overpopulation as a problem. He particularly dissects Ellis Erle’s assertions, in the New York Times, concerning China’s seemingly magical works of technology. Erle comes to the conclusion that China’s amazing technology has and will always be able to keep them out of any problems regarding overpopulation. Of course Tal is able to rhythmically rebut Erle’s claims by explaining that, “Anyone with a teaspoon of historic sensibilities about the country 's environmental history might want to mention its long litany of famines which occurred precisely because carrying capacities were consistently outstripped by a growing population”. Tal then goes on to explain other problems linked directly to overpopulation in China like the food crisis from 1958-1961 which led to the starvation of over 20 million people. He also discusses the Chinese one-child policy describing it as “tough medicine” although the application of the policy was flawed he depicts how it has prevented the next round of famines. Tal ties the China population problems into the rest of the article which is mainly about how quickly the world is growing and what we need to do about it. He presents distressing facts like 1 in 8 people in the world suffer from

Current birth planning (jihua shengyu) program of People’s Republic of China, featured by the one-child-per-couple policy (the one child policy), has been one of the largest and most dramatic population-control campaigns in the world, receiving both praise and sharp evaluation over the past quarter of a century. It has been so successfully implemented in China that the nation’s population growth rate dropped significantly. This policy has been intensely criticized internationally for violating fundamental human rights evidenced by the forced sterilizations and abortions, and the widespread abandonment and neglect of baby girls. As the policy has recently been extended through new legislation as the nation’s demographic strategy in the future (Xin Hua News Agency 2001), we will highlight some of the significant challenges confronting Chinese families in the 21st century as the consequence of this policy. Social policies and programs often work differently from their proposed goals and implementation. An overdetermined view of policy shifts may attribute all changed behavior and outcomes directly to policy and program inputs. Multiple sets of variables and relationships may be needed to explain and account for both those outcomes that were anticipated and those that were not as expected. This review attempts to unbundle these concepts to suggest implications for policies and programs in future.

My initial thoughts about China’s One-Child policy was that it is absurd and immoral. However, after fully investigating other reasons behind the policy I found it to be necessary. The use of the one-child policy has regulated China’s population which in fact can benefit not just China, but the rest of the world’s environmental impacts. It’s no secret that China has the world’s largest amount of natural born citizens and they alone claim a large percentage of the world’s total population. The establishment of the one-child policy has decreased the population by a total of at least 400 million people and that alone is just a 100 million short of Europe’s entire population. Even though China’s one-child policy has been switched for all citizens

China has been experiencing a dramatic demographic transition since 1979 when the one-child policy was implemented. Due to the concern that population growth can pose a threat to China’s economic development not only in the short-term but over the long-term as well, the Chinese government adopted the strict birth control program that every Chinese family can only have one child, though some exceptions were made. Regulations for ethnic minority families were more flexible that they were allowed to have their second child. Furthermore, the policy was unevenly enforced. The birth control program was found more effectively in urban China, where supervision systems are more complete and people are more willing to limit their family sizes, than in rural areas, which were characterized by strong traditional agrarian needs. In general, the one-child policy hit the goal that China’s both fertility rate and birth rate were found decreasing year by year. However, alongside the declining fertility rate, new problems emerge, especially the increased share of the aged population relative to the total population.