The organism I removed from the food web is phytoplankton. The producers will be affected because giant clam would begin to eat more marine algae causing marine algae to decrease in population. Primary consumers will be affected because zooplankton rely on phytoplankton as their food source so without phytoplankton zooplankton will eventually die off. Giant clams and krill rely on marine algae as their food source so when Phytoplankton is taken away they both have to eat marine algae. Eventually there won’t be any marine algae left for the two to eat so they too will become nonexistent. Secondary consumers will be affected because there would not be giant clam for box jellyfish,clownfish, and whale sharks to eat so they would either die or
If a predator organism was removed from an ecosystem, it would allow the prey population to increase which could lead to not having enough food for these organisms to eat. For example, if wolves were eliminated from the taiga biome than there would be a dramatic increase in the population of moose. This would result in the moose not having enough jack pine and could lead to starvation. The wolves would then have to eat more rabbits, elk, and voles which would decrease their population and starve the organisms that rely on these animals.
Starfish prey on Mussels, Chiton, and Goose Neck Barnacle. Since the Starfish is the only predator of the Mussel, what will happen when the Starfish is removed? Since the Mussel is the most aggressive competitor for the stationary consumers, it would be assumed that eventually the Mussels would take over. I PREDICT THAT REMOVING STARFISH FROM THE EXPERIMENT WILL ALLOW THE MUSSELS TO EVETUALLY TAKE OVER THE ROCK. The other elements of the experiment still have predators, like the Chiton for the algae, and the Whelk for the barnacle. But, then the question is posed: won’t the Chiton and Whelk become dominant? No, because they are mobile. The Mussels are sessile and their primary focus is on the take over of space. They are more aggressive about taking over the space rather than worrying about their prey like the leftover mobile consumers would be. This can be tested through the ‘Who Rules The Rock’ mode by pressing to remove the Starfish. My hypothesis should take about 200 weeks to become sure of its
This article, posted by Kelsy Solway, on “CBC News”. It was published on July 8 2015 regarding the algae growth in Jackfish Lake. The article title is “Yellowknife dump runoff may be causing Jackfish Lake algae blooms” and can be access here. Additional analysis and summaries can be read below.
When species at the bottom of the food chain decrease, the top of the food chain is likely to decrease in size as well.
The new movie starring Will Smith called Concussion has sparked controversy, because of the subject matter, due not to what it does say, but what was removed. Smith's new movie is about a forensic neuropathologist named Dr. Bennet Omalu, played by Smith, who finds the first case of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), in a deceased professional football player's brain. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy is a progressive degenerative disease in the brain, which was a contributing factor to the football player's death. In his attempts to release his findings to the public, he is stopped at every turn by the NFL. They won't allow him to release his findings or even acknowledge that CTE is a real disease.
These increases of population could pose a potential shift in the ecosystem, in particularly, and importantly, in the populations of salmon species within the region. Taking a look at the diets of the three animals will suggest that the possibility of interspecies competition between the pollock, squid, and salmon is reasonably likely. Salmon and pollock both heavily rely upon euphausiids (small shrimp-like crustaceans), while both salmon and squid readily consume copepods (also small crustaceans), but salmon have been known to consume squid, making the question of what will happen one of great
On March 21st, our class went to the Monterey Bay Aquarium. The purpose of this trip was not only to explore Earth’s natural habitat’s, but it was also to gather information on our upcoming project and to gather information on how the community of St.Mary, affects the Monterey Bay Aquarium. The answer that we found out is one based off of what we eat. The Monterey Bay Aquarium released an app where it showed which type of seafood were lower in numbers than others. So, if plankton were very low in numbers, it is advised that we not fish for them or not eat as much of it. This shows based just off of what we eat, we can affect the numbers of in the ocean. Also, those plastic bags we buy at Target and Walmart, that we drop outside, drifts itself to the streams, which flow to rivers, which go to oceans, they are floating there, not doing much harm, until sea turtle comes by starts eating it, but gets tangled and choked in it, dies.
The exact scenario changes in each example, but the central idea remains that through a chain of interactions, a non-abundant species has an outsized impact on ecosystem functions.
The Atlantic cod fishery collapse left terrible ecological consequences. As mentioned above, the fishing technology was a major destruction to the ecological system by using deployment and draggers. The huge nets that were dropped and dragged along the bottom of the ocean destroyed the underlying eco-system in the process. The effect of selective fishing on spawning grounds – that is, selectively over-exploiting one species in an ecosystem – had disastrous effect on the feeding relationships in that ecosystem. This contributes to the overall reduction of spawning stock biomass of the targeted species, but also an increase in the number of invertebrate and vertebrate predators such as crustacean and fish which will prey on cod eggs, larvae, and younger fish. It is a little wonder that a species like cod, would eventually run into difficulties struggling to survive when its habitat is being continuously destroyed and the balance of their food chain had been wiped out.
In this research paper I will talk about how a large decrease in the algae population in the Chesapeake Bay will cause problems for not just fish and other species but the people who fish and make a living off of it. A large decrease in algae population will have a domino effect on the food chain. Having a major decrease in algae will hurt how others species live and protect themselves.
With a decrease in algae population, the grasses of the bay will be fed on by zooplankton, oysters, and fish. Without the algae, there would be a huge decrease in Bay grasses. This happens because Zooplankton, oysters, and fish will no longer eat the algae, they would resort to the Bay grasses. The effects then go onto the plants and animals living here. (Science Daily)
of the food chain. This would cause their numbers to rise, which would lead to irreparable damage to the ever-fragile ecosystem.
Overfishing affects a biome by reducing the amount of species. According to the National Ocean Service (NOAA) the effects of overfishing in a coral reef biome leads to a limited amount of wildlife to reproduce. The ones that do reproduce will be smaller as larger wildlife which spawn more offspring are targeted and removed from the biome causing lower overall birth. This causes more algae to be in the environment which can lead to nutrient pollution due to a lack of wildlife that cleans the area of algae. The World Wildlife Foundation (WWF) found that the effects of overfishing on the ocean also caused imbalances in the populations of wildlife such as tuna and the disruption on herbivores by overfishing such as scallops lead to algae bloom in the ocean as well.
This causes smaller aquatic fish to die off, and this eventually causes bigger aquatic fish who rely on consuming the smaller aquatic fish to die (Jobin, "Dams and Disease"). Before one knows it, a domino effect has occurred. Aquatic ecosystem services are even affected because they die from too many nutrients. Ecosystems can’t thrive without these ecosystem services because they tend the ecosystem such as caring for plants, et cetera (Newell, "The Globalization and Environment Reader").
Since the beginning of the human race, the ocean has been a major source of food. People near the shores have been taking of advantage of the ocean’s rich and diverse source of nourishment for centuries, both as a source of food and a livelihood. However, since the dawn of the industrial age, humans have begun to take from the ocean more that it can give. As a result, the ocean can no longer provide the human race with the abundance that it once did. As technology rapidly advances, populations skyrocket, and global warming spreads havoc, the ocean’s biodiversity and once abundant supply of fish is dwindling, calling marine scientists and experts to race to find solutions that will restore the oceans health while battling world hunger.