preview

Genetically Modified Organisms In Frankenstein

Decent Essays

In his article, “GMO Foods and Crops: Africa’s choice”, Robert Paarlberg suggests,“...there has not been any documented evidence that approved GMOs have posed new risks either to human health or the environment.” With that being said, genetically modified organisms are not at risk to anyone or anything. There are countless studies that prove GMOs are in fact beneficial to the environment and human health. GMOs can be directly correlated to Frankenstein; a Gothic Fiction novel, written by Mary Shelley, by resulting that the monster was an organism that was created. There could have been possible breakthroughs in science, if the monster stayed alive longer, or used responsibly. Furthermore, the creature in Frankenstein is genetically modified …show more content…

There are multitudinous studies that prove biotech companies are developing genetically modified foods to prohibit allergies to mainly gluten. First and foremost, as claimed by Chen Zhang, “GMO is defined as follows by WHO (World Health Organization): “organisms (i.e plants, animals, or microorganisms) in which the genetic material (DNA) has been altered in a way that does not occur naturally by mating and/or natural recombination”” (Zhang). It is evident Chen Zhang stems the fact that genetic material is being manipulated from selective breeding, also known as artificial selection. Several people are allergic to gluten, and gluten is made up of rye and barley. Also, it is a main ingredient in wheat. As a compromise, biotech companies have developed gluten-free wheat. As the world-famous scholar Janet Renee explains it, “...biotech companies have received approval to develop gluten-free wheat” (Renee). There have been obvious solutions for the allergy related concerns for GM foods. However, there has been increase in specific allergies, and there has not been any solution to those specific allergens. For example, ¨Of those, only soy is commercially available in genetically modified varieties. But if a person is allergic to conventional soy, s/he will also be allergic to GM soy as it is not different compositionally” (Lim). Later on it also states, The …show more content…

Robert Paarlberg once stated, “There is a scientific consensus, even in Europe, that the GMO foods and crops currently on the market have brought no documented new risks either to human health or the environment.” A widely known debate about GM crops is the risks the organisms have to human health and the environment. Chen Zhang discusses the benefits throughout his article, “Genetically modified foods: A critical review of their promise and problems,” and not only the benefits to human health, but also the benefits to the environment. For instance, “Some genetic modification is specifically targeted to enrich certain nutrients or substances having high therapeutic and pro-health value, including vitamins A, C, E, unsaturated fatty acids, alimentary cellulose and probiotics” (Zhang). Chen Zhang is portraying there are modifications in genetic material, which benefit health by the targeted nutrients and vitamins when modified. Scientists are able to modify the chemical composition in food, which means there will be less of harmful chemicals and more of the beneficial makeup of foods. Later on in the same article it states, “Similarly, using this biotechnology, researchers can also alter the amino acid composition of proteins as well as the content of carbohydrates” (Zhang). In other words, Chen Zhang asserts that scientists and researchers have the capability to change the

Get Access