Gasquet's Case

Fiona Burch with her two kids (plaintiff) claims a case against shire of YR, and a company of quality roads pvt ltd as they are responsible death of the Michael on basis of defendants caused the break of his duty and responsibility.

Parties involved in the case are the Crown and the accused. The crown was represented by Mr C Thompson and his solicitors were the Solicitor for Public Prosecutions. The accused is Neil Allen Baker represented by Mr P Morrissey SC and Ms C Hollingsworth with the solicitors being The Office of Emma Turnball.

Approximately seven different cases have been filed in Essex Probate Court in order to dispute the issues that have arisen from the handling of Hilary’s estate. Denise also attempted to file in Essex Superior Court; however Judge Whitehead found that Denise “had not been involved in the day to day

This criminal case involves two parties. These are the Crown or prosecutor versus Adrian Bayley, aged 43 years.

The plaintiff brought proceedings in the District Court of New South Wales against Mr Stephens and Mr Dick . Upon both defendants being found to have breached a duty of care owed to the deceased, which caused the death, by the trial judge Levy DCJ, both defendants appealed to the Court of Appeal.

1 McAliley v. McAliley, 704 So. 2d 611 - Fla: Dist. Court of Appeals, 4th Dist. (1997). Retrieved fromhttps://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6943653462044241336&q=related:uO2O4AjQXGAJ:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=6,47&as_vis=1

An attorney’s reputation is built by the care taken in brief writing. The judge generally is influenced by an attorney’s brief than by any other form of argument made; therefore, the brief carries persuasive impact, for good or bad, not only for a current client but all future ones. Linda H. Edwards, Legal Writing and Analysis, 167 (4th ed. 2015). Although the six duties of ethical conduct in brief-writing are equally relevant, I have placed six duties of ethical conduct in the following order, in the order of highest importance to least importance.

R(On the application of the Crown Prosecution Service) v Registrar General of Births, Deaths and Marriages [2002] EWCA Civ 1661; [2003] Q.B 1222

Question #9. What is the ethical obligation of a litigation support staff member to the client? To the court? Of a litigation support person from outside firm or consultant?

The main argument introduced in the debate considers whether a practicing solicitor can adhere to the traditional values of moral and ethical integrity that have been reinforced through a set of principles such as the Solicitors Regulation Authority Code of Conduct (SRA). The latter consists of ten mandatory principles that are the professional requirements expected of any solicitor. Traditionally, ethical and moral truthfulness have formed the basis of a competent lawyer and thus when adhering to the traditional principles placed upon lawyers, a lawyer was thought to abide to moral standards. I will aim to tackle the debate by arguing that the SRA provides a framework that allows lawyers to be good people. Secondly, I will also be discussing a lawyer’s moral responsibility. and that whilst ‘The lawyer is conventionally seen as a professional devoted to his client’s interest and…required, to do some things for that client which he would not do for himself’ his moral responsibility must not violate the SRA Code of conduct. Finally, it is imperative to explore the ethical dilemmas solicitors face when attempting to make their clients’ interests their own.

This duty is acknowledged through the leading case of Bolton v Law Society where Lord Bingham states that lawyers should discharge their professional duties with ‘integrity, probity and complete trustworthiness’. Integrity is valued very highly in the field of law and it is also agreed that it is not an absurd or an improbable expectation from the public that all solicitors should be acting with the ‘utmost integrity at all times’. This, along with many other fundamental concepts that are also entrenched fully within the Solicitor Regulation Authority Principles and Codes of Conduct, is under question in regards to Rafa’s conduct towards Sara as well as her employer, Holywell Solicitors.

Many debates have arisen over which ethical theory is the most consistent with lawyer’s professional responsibilities. There are varying approaches from the narrow, liberal theory of the hired gun putting the clients autonomy as the fundamental responsibility of the lawyer, to a more relax position putting the lawyer as a councillor, to the other extreme of paternalism. This paper will address ……

As a professional attorney he also had a duty to always act logically

The profession of law has always been considered as a noble profession and not a business that works on the economic principle of demand and supply. It is not proposed that attorneys live on adoration and natural air however; law in essence is a service-oriented

The modern trust law has its origin in the use (from the Latin ab apus) which was developed as the response of equity to the shortcomings of the common law. A trust is very difficult if not impossible to define, but its essential elements are reasonably easily described and readily understood. There is no statutory definition of a trust . It has been the courts that, over the years, have developed the rules relating to the trust, so all one can do is provide a description of the trust, which reflects those rules and which enables people in a general way to know what is meant when talking about a trust. This essay will consider the case of Re Baden No.2 and explain how the trust principles evolved and develop relating to the certainty of objects. This essay will also analyse the different tests the Law Lords set out in relation to certainty of objects, for a discretionary trust. We will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each approach from the Law Lords and suggest the best way forward for the trustees when deciding the proper approach to take in a discretionary trust.