Funny Ha-Ha The Impact Of The Internet On Politics Summary

With social media at the people’s disposal, users are able to share their thoughts and to keep up to date with current events. Its no surprise to find issues trending on social media every now and then; this year’s election was no exception. Politics are without a doubt a greatly debated topic. Millions of post and articles taking sides flew all across social media; some were true while others were not. A supposed satire letter written by author C.S. Lewis became popular throughout social media during the campaigns. Letter is as followed:

In the debate “When it comes to politics, the internet is closing our minds,” the side that argued for the motion is the side which best argued their ideas by providing consistency throughout the debate and successfully utilizing a number of techniques in order to win their argument. The side that was for the motion used clear and consistent arguments that were backed by data. They used examples in their argument that the audience could understand and relate to easily. The language and tone used in their argument matched that which was appropriate to the intended audience with timely and relatable examples that argued their points successfully.

The Georgia Institute of Technology is a one of the top public research universities in the world. The technology and society program is one of the top-rated programs at Georgia Tech. The program aims to lead in the research and breakthroughs that drive social and scientific progress. This paper investigated and discussed the effect of the Internet on democracy over the world in the period of 1992 to 2002 by using several methods including survey, research and discovering the relationships between the Internet and policies. Numerous previous reports and tests were cited in the paragraph as well as charts. Although the data were gathered only for the period of 1992 to 2002 which means the findings may be outdated, the writers’ predictions in

Social media has emerged as a prominent political platform that attracts voters otherwise unreachable. Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and bloggers are replacing traditional media influence on public opinion with a more efficient outlet. “They target niche audiences with growing precision, contact hard-to-reach voters, extend their influence as online supporters forward their messages and carry out many campaign tasks at much lower cost than before." remarks Tom Price author of “Social Media and Politics: Do Facebook and Twitter influence voters? Social media has the potential to be an even more dangerous medium of influence because of its “ability to collect enormous amounts of information about individual voters — through social media and traditional

The impact of web based communication on public attitudes and political policy making has grown from small to large. With web based communication, people are able to get information out to a larger quantity of people throughout the world. The impact is so great because we no longer need to rely on word of mouth or the media and their personal views. Now everyone can get involved and go online to get information. As stated in the article (the impact of web based communication on election and political policy making). Technology allows for the mass distribution of a one way message from one to many.

(Felczak et al, 2009). These rights include unfettered access to information and knowledge and the free exchange of ideas in the public sphere where everyone may participate in a mutually accountable debate, exchange of reasons, and opinions. (Habermas, 2004). In the 21st Century, the Internet has facilitated the equal opportunity for all participants to share information in a highly flexible environment. While the design of the Internet was to exist as a cooperative, non-hierarchal, communicative system for information sharing, it seamlessly developed into an extension of the public sphere. However, the advent of this new version of the public sphere came with a dark side of anonymity as exampled in the phenomena of

Through the emergence of the Internet, the last 20 years have seen a transformation in the way the society communicates with one another. There is no doubt that the Internet has changed the way the world interacts with one another on a democratic scale. Can it be said that with the emergence of the Internet, a new public sphere has been created? If so, is this new public sphere capable of embodying the theory that Habermas constructed? Petros Iosifidis article “The Public Sphere, Social Networks and Public Service Media” (2011) examines reasons that hinder social networks from becoming a seamless public sphere, and why Public Service Broadcasting should change over to Public Service Media.

This week I was interested in writing my thoughts on the first question about the change in political news throughout the last few decades. As the question explains, many trends have influenced the change in politics within the United States; however, I believe that the emergence of the Internet as a source for political news has had the largest impact on politics.

In summary, the theories of studies made in the computer-mediated communication results said the development of technology had created knowledge in their use. More ideas will be elaborated to analyze the importance of enabling peoples to learn for themselves online making better determinations in the messages received. Literature is writing words considered to be lasting influence. In this study, computer-mediated communication is analyzed by an experiment conducted political perceptions online (Tan et al.,

With the rise and constant evolution of the internet, so too has the interest in researching its impacts. With increasing internet penetration, information diffusion across networks is growing significantly. Intuitively thinking, many posit that the internet revolution has profoundly impacted policy turnout and voter mobilization by allowing people low-cost information, as well as easier means of mobilization and communication, via forums, mass email, etc. Furthermore, the closely associated entity of social networks has become increasingly relevant, due to the ways social network sites can mirror offline networks, while providing internet benefits such as instantaneous communication and mobilization. Despite assumed results of the internet,

However, these discussions mostly are limited within a bunch of users, who read articles from Yahoo page, forming an isolated deliberative group, this strengthen the fragmentation and polarization of the opinions. (Sunstein, 2001, p. 65), to some extend, this also tells why rational deliberation cannot fully promise the democracy on the Internet. Rasmussen (2008,p.9) also pointed out that, debate often need to share moral values, but it is hard in an increasingly differentiate Internet world. Internet users from around the world have different cultural backgrounds and values, it is difficult to adhere a set of standardized requirements and propose a single solution for the same problem.

The internet has been considered as one of the most effective tools in the modern society that promote democracy. Before the introduction of the internet, people were usually afraid of complaining or even pointing out some faults within the government, which affected their freedom of expression. Through the internet, it is now possible for an individual to express their opinions about the government and its operations without any fear (McChesney, 2013).

In this mode of communication, various users of the internet can form their own media platforms in which it can disseminate information at the individual or collectivist levels. These are important features of the democratic uses of the internet, which provided thousands of new Internet users greater freedom to speak their minds without the costs of being a major newspaper or TV station. The “real world” interaction of website-based interactions provides individual and

Theorists contend that representative government is headed for direct democracy by way of the Internet. Essentially what will happen is that representatives will no longer be needed because citizens will be able to use the Internet to make decisions. Grossman contends that “the more power [citizens] have to control their government and to involve themselves in making its decisions, the better” (41). Over the years citizens have been obtaining information through the media, newspapers, and other forms of mass media. The issues that arise with obtaining information through these sources are that the government can easily censor them. With the Internet comes “vastly expanded capacities for data collection, for computation, and for automation” (Kamark & Nye 22).

This topic is important because it allows us to gauge people’s perception and impressions of certain cues in the web environment. The research will help researchers understand which cues communicate to people better in the Internet environment. The topic is unknown as of now but can have significant impacts down the road. This information can help sell products, help political candidates; advertisements and the list can go on. We need to know more about this phenomenon because it will help with out communication on the web truly works. We can find out which cues work and don’t while trying to communicate a certain message to people. The authors do not state that this study advances the field of communication but it does get the conversation started about how the Internet and communicating in this medium is very different from tradition communication face-to-face. The authors claim that by researching cues this will further the advancement of how certain cues are used political campaigns on the web. The study does not try to advance the theory but instead uses it vigorously to show how it works in the study.