The materials and methods are adapted from Evolution Lab Manual, Lab One: The Fly Lab (Welsh, 2016). The stock bottles contained true breeding homozygous flies of either ebony body or wild-type body (tan). The fruit fly was observed because it is easily cultured, it has a two week generation time at 21-23°C, it occupies little storage space, and it is large enough to see phenotypic traits. Two cultures were set up with an equal number of flies with each trait, to start with an initial allele frequency of p=0.5. One culture was set up with a small population of eight flies: two wild-type females, two wild-type males, two ebony females, and two ebony males. The wild-type body flies were sexed under a dissecting microscope on a sorting plate, …show more content…
The wild-type body flies were sexed, and the twenty flies needed for the culture were aspirated into a clean dry transfer vial. Extra flies were aspirated into another transfer vial. Then the ebony body flies were sexed and the twenty flies needed were aspirated into the transfer vial with the wild-type flies destined for the culture. All other ebony flies were aspirated into an extra transfer vial. The flies destined for the culture tapped to the bottom of the vial and were then chilled in an ice bucket for about seven minutes. Once the flies were no longer awake they were gently transferred to the culture vial. The culture vial was kept on its side until all the flies were awake to ensure they did not stick to the culture media. The phenotype data and allele frequency was recorded for each …show more content…
Flies from the small culture were aspirated into a transfer vial and put on ice for about seven minutes to immobilize them. Then the flies were placed onto the sorting plate and the first four males and four females were chosen and their body phenotypes were recorded. The same transfer techniques were used to place the flies into the fresh culture vial. The extra flies were disposed of in the morgue. Flies from the large population were aspirated into a transfer vial and put on ice for about seven minutes. Again the flies were sorted and the first twenty males and twenty females were chosen and their body phenotypes were recorded. The same transfer techniques were used to place the flies in the fresh culture vial. The excess flies were disposed of in the morgue. The allele frequencies and expected heterozygosities at each transfer were
The expected number of wild type flies in the F2 generation is 734.25 and the expected number of shaven bristle flies in the F2 generation is 244.75. This, again, exhibits a 3:1 ratio of normal phenotype to affected phenotype.
Maintaining healthy cultures is essential in achieving the proper outcome expected for this lab. Before preparation of vials, or observation of flies, the workbenches and equipment, such as brushes, pipets, and measuring tools were wiped down with 70% ethanol ,and fly pads, as well as Co2 guns, were thoroughly disinfected with kim wipes. Hands were required to be thoroughly washed with anti-bacterial soap and completely dry, especially before preparation of food. Distilled water and other required sources were regularly changed in order to maintain
A) Their F1 offspring were 97 wild type quahaug flies. What is the genotype of these F1 flies??
It was decided that there would be 80 vestigial flies and 20 wild type flies to total to an initial population of 100 drosophila. Next, the flies were anesthetized flies using Fly Nap. The flies were counted out to reach desired ratio, sexing the flies making sure there are equal amounts of males and females to be sure there is ample individuals to allow successful mating. The fly’s food was prepared by taking a frozen rotten banana, cutting it in half, mashing up the banana meat, and mixing yeast into it. The
We started out with three populations; B, D, and G. In order for us to properly create controlled genetic crosses, we had to ensure that all the female flies were “virgins”.
METHODS: In this experiment, the instructor provided us with 30 ebony individuals and 20 wild type individuals. In order to get an exact amount of each type, we anesthetized the flies and counted them off by gently using a fine point paint brush. Then all 50 Drosophila were put into a population cage which had a lid that had six holes for the centrifuge tubes. Two food tubes and four clean, empty tubes were added on the first day. Each food tube consisted of half a cup full of food mixed with 6-7 milliliters of water. This was the fly medium. The food should turn blue once the water is added. Each tube was labeled with a number and with the date. Every two to three days we added one more food tube until all 6 tubes contained the fly medium. After all 6 tubes were filled, the following days after we exchanged the first food tube with a new food tube. At the end of the experiment, we fed the flies with a total of 8 food tubes. Then the flies were anesthetized, again. At the end of this four week lab, the number of living ebony and wild
The vials were separated into males and females. Five male and female from each vial were put in a specific vial ending up with 20 flies in one vial. It was made sure the group had enough flies; any extra flies were distributed among the groups to assure everyone has the correct amount of flies for each genotype. The exact number of flies for all four phenotypes ( male (+/+), male (e,e), females (+,+), and female (e,e)) were used. Any remaining flies not need by anyone were put cake into the cultured vial where they came from.
You can collect individual flies that you have generated (for use in future experiments) by dragging them
To anesthetize the flies, one vial of wildtype and one of ebony was taken and a Flynap kit. The wand was dipped into the container and wiped off on the cap to get rid of the excess. To get the flies away from the plug the tube was tapped on the table. The wand was slipped into the vial and the vial was instantly turned to the side to avoid the flies from falling asleep in the food and dying. When the flies seemed to have stopped moving the plug was removed and the flies were placed on a paper to begin scoring them.
As stated by the World Health Organization, “all fifteen HA subtypes and nine DNA subtypes have been detected in free flying birds”. (WHO, 2005, 12) They, in turn, provide a huge and highly mobile pool of genetic diversity.
The parents are both homozygous. The homozygous dominant would represent the wild type. And the homozygous recessive would represent the other fly parent of a different strain. The F1 generation would consist of 100% Wild Type but they would all be heterozygous in carrying the recessive gene.
The purpose of this current study was to examine the effect of elevated incubation temperature from 25ºC to 30ºC on recombination rates between the genes for sepia eyes (se), wrinkled wings (Wr) and ebony body (e) on chromosome 3 of D. melanogaster. It was hypothesized that there would be an increase in recombination rates with increased incubated temperatures in the gene located in the temperature-sensitive region near the centromere. The genes that are in or near the temperature-sensitive region (se-Wr, se-e) were found to have a significant increase in recombination frequencies with increased temperature from 25ºC to 30ºC. However, there was no significant increase in the recombination frequency for the gene pair Wr-e because this gene pair is not located in the temperature-sensitive region, thus the increase in recombination frequency was not significantly different. Based on the results from this experiment, the recombination frequencies will increase as it is exposed to extreme temperature stress.
The test tube was then filled ¼ with tap water. Next, ¼ tab of Alka-Seltzer was dropped into the test tube and sealed with the rubber stopper of the Anesthetizing Device. The glass pipette was then slid into the test tube to expose the flies to carbon dioxide. Deprived of oxygen, the flies then fell asleep for about 5 minutes before they began to recover consciousness. To use the chemical Lull-A-Fly, a cotton swab was dipped into the chemical and then slid into the vial containing the flies. After a few minutes, the flies fell unconscious for about 40 minutes.
After female fly laid eggs, it took 1 day for embryos to developed and hatched into a worm-like white larvae, attempting to eat as much of the food for storage and prepared for pupation. From day 3-4 (first, second, and third instar larva), white larvae stopped eating and formed an immobile brown pupa. On the next 4-5 days, the body began to give the adult wings form and hatched in the next 3-4 hours. The newly enclosed flies look very pale, larger in size and poor pigmentation compared to adults. The whole timing was 25 C, set for both wild type and mutant. Mutant’s eyes are more sparkles than their wild types so their nickname is “diamond”. One of the possible genes would rise to the mutant phenotype is ruby, rb, 1-7.5 which decreased the number of pigmentation of eye cells [4]. Mutations in carnation, car, 1-62.5 and henna, hn, 3-23.0 characterized eye mutation and cell defected which caused eyes texture deficiency [1, 2]. Also garnet, g, 1-44.4, contributed to slight roughness eye mutation [5] and moire, me, 3-19.2 affected the expression of normal eye texture gene of wild type population [3]. Observation of the mutant flies possibly shown that the phenotypic “diamond” is 100%. Thus the penetrance is 100% in the all the mutants. Environment and genetic background displays a key role in expressivity of mutant
Moreover, the migration of individuals from one genetically distinct population to another is also an important way for alleles to be added to or subtracted from a local population. Whenever an organism leaves one population and enters another, it subtracts its genetic information from the population it left and adds it to the population it joins. If it contains rare alleles, it may significantly affect the allele frequency of both populations. The extent of migration need not be great. However, as long as alleles are entering