Freedom Of Peaceful Assembly And Association Essay

This political cartoon refers tot he Boston massacre. The building int he back is the state house. The right side of the political cartoon shows Boston soldiers in uniform holding rifles with bayonets that re firing at the crowd. One of the men is a commander who is hiding a sword and giving the orders. The soldiers and the commander all have determined and fierce looks on their faces.

The cartoon uncovers the manipulation orchestrated by the Democrat's top representatives over the free-soilers. The cartoonist shows the responsibility of the Democrats for the decision on slavery in the new territories. Highlighting the smallest of the Democrats but with enough power to hold the giant Free-Soiler and lead every situation in favor of party ambitions. In the background, through the flames and the figure of a dead man, the cartoonist highlights the conflicts lived

In “A Call for Unity” it is argued that matters such as this should only be pursued in the courts. In this it says that the citizens need to “find the proper channels,” which they believe can only be through court. They are in clear disapproval of demonstrations, saying “that decisions of those courts should in the meantime be peacefully

  This cartoon uses many elements in too prove the artist's argument and catch the attention of the viewer.   First and foremost, in the political cartoon by Jeff Parker, he creates a piece of work that targets the attention of Americans and U.S. government and officials.   This is the intended audience because when trying to achieve change or promote an awareness about a certain problem,  authority and also the group of people that being depicted must be reached.   However, in the political cartoon the artist's purpose was to illustrate  difference in wealth, more specifically the greed and accessibility to medical attention that exists in the United States of America than that of third world countries.

As an American citizen, we are guaranteed many freedoms through the Constitution. The first amendment in the Constitution states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances,” (US Const. amend. I). This means that all people have the right to assemble a protest peacefully, and Congress in unable to prevent this practice. However, in recent years this has become controversial because many residents question how much protesters can get away with before a demonstration becomes turbulent. Because of this question, there have been many cases in which law enforcement has become involved in rallies. This essay will explore when law enforcement became involved in rallies, and when they did not.

The first source is a political cartoon dealing with the patriot act, the patriot act is an act that began on September 11th after a life taking terrorist attack, it provides government officials with the ability and tools to stop future terrorist attacks. The cartoon presents a ironic perspective that actions such as the removal of rights and freedoms are needed to ensure the citizens are safe and unharmed. However, it is clear that the cartoonist vigorously disagrees with the patriot act by the use of her/his jail like looking room. The cartoon suggest that american citizens are blind to what is going on around them, the individuals in the source are smiling despite the fact that they are under 24 hour surveillance, and more than likely

Political cartoons are an illustrative technique that political cartoonist use to display a message to the viewers about government, world affairs, and politics. In 1754, publishers of the Pennsylvania Gazette published the first political cartoon illustrated by Benjamin Franklin (West, par. 1). Benjamin Franklin used his first political cartoon, titled Join or Die, to gain support from the colonies for the Crown’s war against the French (West, par. 1). Since the 1700s, illustrators use political cartoons as a medium to display political messages to its viewers (West, par. 1). On March 10, 2015, publishers of the Columbia Daily Tribune published a political cartoon, illustrated by John Darkow, titled Hillary Has A Primary Opponent (Darkow,

Cartoons have been a prominent and interesting apparatus for politics throughout the ages. Political movements, parties, and groups using propaganda to further their beliefs dates back to the eighteenth and nineteenth century. Though America faces an austere history, lighthearted propaganda colors its decades and gives them life. Political cartoons are so widely used in America that they have become a significant piece of pop culture. Moreover, because of their ability to capture the reader’s attention, propaganda is exploited throughout politics.The cartoons are wonders of the human imagination; illustrators create comical images and intertwine profound political opinions to influence their viewer’s mind. For example, one movement that abundantly grew from propaganda was the women’s rights movement. The artists of the seemingly despised cause drew controversial cartoons that set a fire in the hearts of women all over the world. Consequently, the same cartoons ignited a passionate war between women who wanted freedom, and those who believed that women could not handle that freedom. Through the use of colorful concepts and daring expressions, political cartoons display the influence of the women’s rights movement throughout history, while the cartoons of Anti-Feminists demonstrates the world’s reaction to the movement.

In the cartoon, the first noticeable item would be the phrase “Love trumps hate” spread over three different panels. The phrase derives from the 2016 election between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump; many of Clinton’s supporters viewed, and an overwhelming majority still view, Donald Trump as a person who incites hate and violence. In response to him inflammatory rhetoric and often controversial platform, Clinton supporters coined the phrase “love trumps hate.” It is an obvious play on the President’s name; an attempt to make his name forever synonymous with hate and violence. However, following the days of the election, and for many months prior, those same people began rioting and inciting violence towards Trump and his supporters. Many people were physically assaulted and hospitalized due to the actions of “loving” Clinton supporters because they exercised their first amendment right to wear a shirt or a hat to show support of their candidate.

Protests riots in the United States has proven to an issue for both the country’s financial strength and the unity of the nation. With the presence of social injustices, combined with the increased impact of social media propaganda, protests riots are beginning to reach an all time high. Protest riots destroy individual communities and businesses, jeopardizes the safety of others and taints the protest’s cause by resorting to civil disobedience. Action must be done in order to prevent these random acts of violence from continuing after every social hot topic. The goal is not to prevent citizens from protesting; in fact, this should be encouraged. The goal is to change the way the protests are handled from both the citizens and authority perspectives, in order to prevent these protests from escalating into something dangerous.

The 2016 election has already galvanized countless Americans, and it could forever change the direction in which America progresses. WIth the rise of real-estate mogul Donald Trump and his powerful rhetoric, some Americans have decided to protest against him. In recent weeks, more and more protests have erupted as America becomes ever more divided. “Three Trump Protesters Arrested, While Demonstrators in NYC detained” perfectly shows the First Amendment in action. While the First Amendment ensures the right to peaceful assembly, the article does show that authorities can arrest people interfering with traffic and other everyday activities. The protesters who “[tied] themselves to their cars ...were arrested” demonstrates that protestors cannot

From the shocking election win from Donald Trump on Tuesday November 8, 2016, Americans across the nation have come together to protest in major cities like Orlando, Los Angeles, New York City, Chicago, and Boston. These protests have caused major blockages in highways, interstates, bridges, and smaller roads. Also, arrests have been resulted from interferences with the police. With the policies Trump has promised to do as president, more and more people have decided to join the streets to protest. Most of them have been peaceful but some have been shown with violence as people “chanted anti-Trump slogans” (Blau, Capelouto, and McKirdy 1).

Peaceful resistance to laws, I would argue, could only enforce and support a free American society. One of the grand ideas that North America was founded upon was the acceptance and encouragement of unique attitudes and being different from everyone else. If, for example, an individual in today's society were to peacefully disagree with the fact that marijuana should be illegal. This individual might, perhaps, be found relaxing in his or her own home smoking a little bit of pot. It has happened before where policemen have barged into people's houses without consent of the individual, with the sole reason being "I thought I smelled marijuana." No policeman should ever have the authority to barge into anyone's home without anything less than a search warrant. Was the individual

March 16 saw a demonstration in Montgomery, Alabama in which 580 demonstrators planned to march “from the Jackson Street Baptist Church to the Montgomery County Courthouse” (Reed 26). These protestors included a large number of northern college students. They met a police line a few blocks from the Courthouse and were forbidden from proceeding because “they did not have a parade permit” (Reed 26). Across the street came 40 or so students who planned on joining the group en route to the Courthouse. Eventually a few of the demonstrators dared to cross the street, led by James Forman who had organized the march. When it seemed the whole group would cross, police took action, with mounted officers and volunteers arriving at 1:12 pm. Riding into the small group of protestors, they forced most to withdraw, but a few stood fast around a utility pole where horsemen began to beat them. “A posseman

The theme of my mural is the freedom of speech. Seen by some as a right and by some as a privilege, the freedom of speech was seen in almost everything we learned, from Apartheid to the Kim dynasty. In the United States, the freedom of speech was established early on in the constitution, and it is a right that many take for granted everyday. In other corners of the world, people don’t have the right, or the privilege. This is sometimes caused by racism or sexisim. The lack of freedom that a lot of the world faces manifests itself everywhere, most obviously in developing nations and even in first world countries.