preview

Forrest Thomson Poetic Artifice Analysis

Decent Essays
Open Document

Two – Co-Option Co-option is I argue most clearly defined by Veronica Forrest-Thomson’s Poetic Artifice. A text, that pushed back against critics of the previous generation and endeavoured early on to integrate structuralist thought with post structuralist. This integration between structuralism and post-structuralism can be seen as an attempt to get at the importance of poetry. In an attempt to stress and illuminate poetry’s unique ability to be “transformative of both language and the world.” Forrest-Thomson in Poetic Artifice demands an intense focus on “all the rhythmic, phonetic, verbal and logical devices which makes poetry different from prose” to best consider this ‘transformative’ nature. It is in this distinguishing of poetry from prose, and the highly formalist manner and “structuralist distrust of language’s transparency” in which she follows that one can also see a similar differencing between the broader spectrum of literature with the sciences. There is no need in Forrest-Thomson's work for differing areas to be inclusive of one another, to the point of loss of individuality, because of a homogenizing of methodology and epistemic reasoning. Throughout both Poetic Artifice and her thesis Poetry as Knowledge: The Use of Science by Twentieth Century Poets, Forest-Thomson can be seen to put forward a new structure, in which separation is crucial for any kind of interrelation between the two fields of knowledge. She follows a similar stance as that of Kelly

Get Access