Forner Company

Pricing can play an important role in the success or disaster of any product. Too high a price and the product will fail; too low a price and not enough profits will be made to sustain business operations (Hisrich, Peters, & Shepherd, 2014). The key is to make the customer think that they are paying exactly the right price for the product. Anything else though in this regard means the product is not positioned well in the mind of the consumer. First of all, Gril-Kleen will have to decide on what sort of strategy it needs to pursue. This strategy is decided on three factors namely costs, margins and competition.

That being said, suppliers can have some power in regards to choosing the number of stores where their product can be purchased at. This allows the suppliers to regulate their sales and stay away from the “red tape”. The bargaining power of customers impacts HBC as customers are able to influence pricing based on their buying habits. Of course, customers do not choose the retail prices offered to them, however, if inexpensive clothing were to lead the industry, retail stores would adapt to this consumer demand and offer an abundance of inexpensive clothing due to consumer preferences. These forces lead to rivalry among competitors due to the many options offered to consumers to grant their desires. These forces combine to cause strategic implications for HBC. HBC must differentiate itself from its competitors who, similar to HBC, have large annual revenue, strong and profitable supplier agreements and large amounts of capital. As well, due to competitors large sale volumes, competitive pricing is an implication which faces

Of the four P’s in the marketing mix, the pricing strategy is arguably of primary importance. In fact, price is the only element in the marketing mix that generates revenue and drives profitability. The revenue generated by price is also essential to cover the cost of the other three P’s, namely, product, place, and promotion. Therefore, none of the other strategies in the marketing mix would be possible if a company’s pricing strategy does not generate revenue (Hill, 2013). Recognizing the critical importance of an optimal pricing strategy, Cabela’s implemented a SKU level profitability and price optimization system supplied by Revionics Inc. in 2013 (“2013 Annual Report”, 2014).

The pricing strategy that I chose is marketing objectives. Our company will deliver on this strategy to this stand by competing with our competitor’s stand. Our competitor, Jimmy, manages the Lemonade Stand “Liquid Yellow” charges $1.50 for one cup of lemonade. However, they use artificial ingredients, such as artificial flavoring and coloring, white sugar, etc. My company decided that we want to have a price that is higher than Jim’s price. We decided that we want to charge $2.00 for a cup of lemonade. We decided to charge this price because unlike Jim’s stand, we use all natural ingredients, which cost more than artificial ingredients and are healthier for you than artificial ingredients are. That is my company’s pricing strategy.

Imagine that you work for a pricing strategy consulting business. Select a business that will be your next

4. This will depend on the position that HSM will take. The separates customer ignores quality in preference to the ability to purchase more garments, and might not perceive any difference between HQS and low-quality separates (LQS). Hence, if no action is taken by HSM, the separates customer might still prefer LQS (since it costs lesser than HQS, and enables them to purchase more garments), and HSM will still face significant competitive threat from LQS. Therefore, HSM must be able to differentiate HQS such that the separates customer perceives distinct benefits in HQS as compared to LQS, which also justifies the difference in price. One example would be to market HQS strategically so as to convince the separates customer that higher quality will equate to higher comfort (since separates customer places emphasis on comfort), which justifies the higher prices charged for HQS. Thus, LQS could cater to the separates customer who prefers having the ability to purchase more garments (and hence, sacrificing ‘comfort’), while HQS could cater to the separates customer who does not mind paying a higher price for more ‘comfort’. Hence, if HSM is able to create perceived value for its HQS and communicate this message effectively, it will be able to

Companies can choose many ways to set prices, skimming price strategy where a company sets a higher price than normal and a penetrating price where low initial price is set. “Pricing

Semicontronics is an Australian manufacturing company that has been in the business of semi manufactured electronics for over a decade. Semicontronics has a solid reputation for meeting customer demands for quality products on time and on budget. The majority of Semicontronics customers are international, mid-market manufacturing companies that produce generic electronics such as cell phones, digital media players and game consoles. Retail stores in foreign countries purchase the generic products and rebrand them for sale.

However, there are several factors for the company to choose its pricing strategy. In this case, it may be better if the company choose to sell its product at $21.50 instead of $15.50. This is due to the fact that price-cutting appears to be not a good strategy in this industry. If every player in the same industry starts to lower the price of their products, every company will end up having the low price, which in turns lead to a low profit margin. Moreover, referring to the calculation in a below table, it also implies that if the price is lower than $12, sales will not be able to cover the variable cost incurred, thus it will bring about a loss in net profit.

b) Another alternative should be using the negotiation method in order to develop a “win-win” situation. A negotiating party would have to be applied, “When a long period of time is required to produce the items purchased” (p 375). In these circumstances, suitable economic price adjustment clauses must be negotiated. Opportunities for various improvements may develop, such as the new manufacturing methods, new packaging possibilities, substitute materials, new plant layouts, and new tools. Negotiation permits an examination and evaluation of all these potential improvements. Competitive bidding does not. The advantage would be assurance of a long-term business with the Company along with reasonable profit for the supplier and reasonable cost for the buyer.

Herbert Hoover once said “Competition is not only the basis of protection to the consumer, but is the incentive to progress.” (Hoover, n.d.). Every company must progress over time and find ways that will draw in consumers. Using Target Corporation as an example, the company’s pricing strategy, covering company objective, competition and customers that belong to the five Cs of pricing, will be discussed. Then, Target’s retail strategy will be discussed using the four P’s; product, price, promotion and place.

Pricing is important when marketing a product. The determining factor for the pricing is the material, time to make, amount spent on marketing and promotion of the product. The goal in providing such a product that is moderately

Price, which is one of the most important elements of the marketing mix, can be difficult to get right. Pricing too high, or low, can negatively impact on customer satisfaction and revenue. Adopting a pricing strategy is necessary to achieve desired sales objectives (Chan & Wong 2005).

The strategy for setting a product’s price often has to be changed when the product is part of a product mix. In this case, the firm looks for a set of prices that maximizes its profits on the total product mix. Pricing is difficult because the various products have related demand and costs and face different degrees of competition.

In this assignment, pricing strategy for backpack will be discussed. After estimation of product’s cost, demand and mark up, we have to decide an appropriate pricing strategy for setting a base price for our backpack (Lamb etal. 2016). The alternative strategies for the backpack which would be discussed is price skimming and penetration strategy. Firms benefit from price skimming from high profit margin, perceived high quality and attract customers when price lowered, while it’s more applicable with inelastic demand, also attract competitors and having difficulty in adjusting appropriate time to lower the price. Penetration strategy brought positive effects such as low input cost, and it is suitable for elastic demand product. However, might result bankruptcy if company unable to survive in the beginning, it require long period for returns and low price might be tagged with low quality. The chosen strategy for backpack is price skimming which might results better effect on our targeted segment because outdoor enthusiasts aimed at high quality.