Fiechtner, L., Sharifi, M., Sequist, T., Block, J., Duncan, D. T., Melly, S. J., … Taveras, E. M. (2015). Food Environments and Childhood Weight Status: Effects of Neighborhood Median Income. Childhood Obesity, 11(3), 260–268. http://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2014.0139 Fiechtner, Sharifi, Sequist, Block, Duncan, Melly and Taveras (2015) studied the relationship between childhood obesity, neighborhood median income, and surrounding food environments. Median neighborhood income is a variable of socioeconomic status (SES). Food environments were broken down into grocery stores, restaurants, and fast food restaurants within each neighborhood. Participants included over 40,000 children from 14 pediatric practices within eastern Massachusetts, USA. …show more content…
In conclusion, they observed living closer to large or small grocery stores lowered BMI z-scores, but living closer to fast food joints and restaurants caused higher BMI z-scores. Researchers determined median neighborhood income (socioeconomic class) was an effect modifier within the study for fast food joints and convenience stores. The risk from being closer to fast food joints and restaurants increased more when taking into account the lower SES neighborhoods. Researchers provided potential reasoning for the results, such as food affordability, time constraints, accessibility, high caloric food production, and placement of convenience stores. This research can be useful in creating policies to help curb the childhood obesity epidemic starting with food environments. Goisis, A., Sacker, A., & Kelly, Y. (2016). Why are poorer children at higher risk of obesity and overweight? A UK cohort study. The European Journal of Public Health, 26(1), 7–13. http://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv219 Goisis, Sacker, and Kelly (2016) studied how lower socioeconomic children are more at risk than others for developing obesity or becoming overweight. The children for the study were located in the United Kingdom within the Millennium Cohort Study (MCS). A total of 11,965 children born from September 2000 to January 2002, ages from 3, 5, 7, and 11 were included. Body measurements including height and weight and family income or socioeconomic
In 2015, 15% of children between the ages of 2 to 15, in Scotland, were at risk of obesity, in relation to their Body Mass Index (Scottish Health Survey, 2015). For children, the BMI ranges changes as they grow and get older, as well as being dependent on gender. For example, if a 12 year old boy and a 9 year old boy have the same BMI, and the 12 year old is classed as healthy, it doesn’t mean that subsequently the 9 year old is healthy too. It can, in fact, allude that the younger boy is overweight. Obesity in childhood can lead to a plethora of health issues in later life, and the children are more likely to be obese or overweight in adulthood. The World Health Organisation identified some of the future health outcomes of being obese in childhood. These include cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, musculoskeletal disorders, such as osteoarthritis, and in the worst case; death. WHO has estimated that, globally, over two million people die annually from health problems associated with being obese or overweight (WHO, 2016). There are several contributing factors to a child’s weight, including; parental weight and activity level, geographical location and deprivation.
This overwhelming statistic contributes to the 17% of children that have obesity in the United States. More specifically in Texas, 19.1% of children are considered obese. Furthermore, Texas is tied for the rank of 11 for the highest obesity rates among the United States. Looking at the Brazos County every one in seven person is obese. This statistic accounts for the one half of the population is overweight or obese. In lower-income areas such as parts of the Brazos Valley, obesity rates tend to be higher compared to higher income areas. reveal to have higher obesity rates. This is because majority of low-income families have less access to healthy food and opportunity for physical activity. Lower income neighborhoods offer a higher accessibility to unhealthy food sources. In a study done on low-income areas of Los Angeles, it was shown that a greater number of fast-food restaurants congregate the low income areas of Los Angeles compared to the higher income areas of Los Angeles (Hilmers, et al., 2015). Results for similar studies done on the amount of convenience stores in certain areas show that “Low-income zip codes have 30% more conveniences stores” compared to middle-income zip codes (Hilmers, et al., 2015). Convenience stores tend to carry large amounts of snack food, a variety of beverages, and little produce. Low-income areas also reveal that the portion of recreational facilities in
Obesity is a problem in different areas throughout the world; obesity is a major problem in the United States of America. The food industry in the U.S. has changed. Food is cheaper and easier to access, but food is lower in quality and is massively produced (Kenner, 2008). Food is no longer as hard to come by as it once was and is not as expensive, but healthy food is more expensive and, most of the time, requires trips to the grocery store. In American society today, American are busy and have minimal time to exercise, cooking, or even go to the grocery store. The lower socioeconomic classes are notably affected as a result of individuals and families of lower socioeconomic classes often can’t afford healthy food from local grocery stores
The graph below shows the prevalence of obesity among children split into five equal-sized groups by household income level. The graph shows a general trend of increasing obesity occurrences with decreasing household income. For both girls and boys, obesity frequency was significantly higher in the lowest income quintile than among those in the highest. The figure below shows the frequency of obesity among children (aged 2 to 15) by equalised household income quintile: Health Survey for England, 2004–2008.
Even with Michelle Obama’s commitment to eradicate food deserts nationwide by 2017, (YOUTUBE VIDEO) the number and severity of food deserts in the Sedgwick County area is continuing to grow. Research suggests that food deserts are more likely to 1) be in low income neighborhoods, 2) be in minority neighborhoods, and have groceries offered at a higher rate (food is more expensive). Additionally, food deserts tend to have a higher concentration of fast food restaurants (Morland, Wing, Roux, & Poole, 2001) and some studies suggest a positive correlation between BMI and food deserts (Gallagher, 2014). Because crime tends to occur more often in low income neighborhoods, other studies suggest that unsafe play environments could be more positively correlated to BMI than food deserts (Booth, Pinkston, & Poston, 2005). This is controversial at best and further research needs to be conducted to determine the relationship between childhood obesity and food deserts. In Wichita the demographics of food deserts are on target with research and it is plain to see why it’s happening here and in places across
Children and adolescents, their health is of the most upmost importance. The child is impacting through everything they do in their lives and everything that they come face to. One of these factors that come into play into a child’s life is Obesity. Most importantly the racial and ethnic disparities that involve Obesity. Unless this issue of this inclining obesity is addressed, there will be assumptions that the amount of years a person will live will surely decline (Johnson, 2012). Obesity is a killer as it is the secondary killer and could well be our first if the people don’t take action (Johnson, 2012). Obesity increases the risk of cardiovascular disease as well as asthma and diabetes (Johnson, 2012). Seventeen percent of young adults in the USA today are obese (Rossen, 2014). The commonness of obesity has escalated throughout the years in Children and Young adults that were being seen in Adults (Caprio et al., 2008). There are many disparities in which affect children in every way but the one that affects the obesity in childhood is racial and ethnic disparities. The amount of obesity in childhood is increasing in all ethnic and racial groups but it is found that nonwhite population have the most amount of Obesity (Caprio et al., 2008). The Mexican- American and non-Hispanic black children have a heavier load to carry as of racial and ethnic subgroups (Rossen, 2014). As children are expose to different physical and social environments, they are wide-open to different
This is a weakness because the data may have changed due to the rising endemic of childhood obesity in the United States. Focusing on the ideas of “toxic environment”, there has been no research conducted on the relationship to genotype. It is unknown if certain individuals, who have obesity-predisposing genes, are likely to expose themselves to the toxic environment. Concerning socioeconomic status, it is difficult to classify the mechanisms that underlie it, as research has some suggestions, but no definitive proof. Several studies in poor SES areas had a higher exposure to fast-food outlets, which contain calorically dense inexpensive foods. Many low SES communities are situated in high frequency areas, therefore less space for parks or recreational centers. Some researchers claim limited access to resources, differential costs of nutritious foods or access to recreational facilities all play a role in the inverse relationship between obesity and SES. There is little research on how family home nutrition and physical activity influences food insecurity and childhood obesity in rural settings. It is difficult to gain this information, as many people want to live private lives and not be the center of an ongoing research
To begin this paper discusses what obesity is and how it is measured, determined and classified in children and why it is considered an epidemic. Then, provides examples of parental influences, including prenatal and postnatal care; followed by market failure and environmental influences. Next, this paper addresses risk factors of high-poverty neighborhoods including ethnicity, race and socioeconomic statistics. Lastly, the paper concludes with interventions and groups that address childhood obesity, social work role and future predictions.
Poor parents are less likely to monitor their children's diet, diet patterns and physical activity due to stress and time constraints if they work. Parents who work full-time are less able to monitor their children due to a decrease in maternal presence and availability during the day. Studies shows that poor people who move out of low-income housing into better neighborhoods are much less likely to have diabetes or be obese than people who stay behind in poor neighborhoods. Studies suggests that not only the financial burned of poverty contributes to obesity but the surroundings or type of area that an individual lives in adds to the complication. (Committee on Progress in Preventing Childhood Obesity. National academic Press. ) (2005) Progress in Preventing Childhood Obesity: Focus on Schools. Retrieved from the National academic Press, http://site.ebrary.com/lib/devry/Doc?id=10115249&ppg=11
One must understand the diversity of health issues in dealing with different ethnicity groups in childhood obesities. Since my research data demonstrate that minorities are more likely to be obese than non-minorities, thus I do not want to provide an image of social labeling and stigmatizing minority children who are overweight. There are many factors that play in role in children being obese that must be taken into accounts. One of the factors, the income status of the parents and how it generally affects the child quality of life, living environment. For example, if the parents have a low yearly income it can factor in the child being obese in comparison to a child’s parent having an average or high income, including affecting the living environment and the type of food eaten. In addition, obese children are prone to psychological issues such as depression, general anxiety, emotional problem, including eating disorder (Holm et al., 2014). And different race and ethnicity deal with these types of psychological issues differently.
Poverty has a direct influence on the type of food that is consumed due to the rising cost of healthier foods, as well as the fact that less healthy, higher calorie foods are typically more affordable (The State of Obesity, 2014). To get a clearer look at the income level of African American families, statistics show that nearly 40% of African American children under 18 live under the poverty line, as well as more than 12% of African American families living with an income that is less than 50% of the federal poverty line (The State of Obesity, 2014). The other predominant issue that aids in obesity in the African American population is the lack of available resources in the form of food options and education. Even with their income status excluded from the equation, African American neighborhoods contain the least amount of supermarkets compared to other neighborhoods (The State of Obesity, 2014). The lack of supermarkets near them makes it difficult to find access to fresher, healthier foods to eat in order to foster a healthier
Citizens of low socioeconomic communities are more likely to consist of corner stores, carry outs, and small markets that sell processed, high-sugar, and high-fat foods. Resulting in residents in low-income communities more inclined to becoming obese and acquiring diabetes. Majority inner city urban communities do not have adequate grocery stores without adequate grocery stores, locals are more likely to be afflicted with diabetes, obesity, and higher mortality rates compared to high socioeconomic
Social factors, including poverty and a lower level of education, have been linked to obesity. One reason for this may be that high-calorie processed foods cost less and are easier to find and prepare than healthier foods, such as fresh vegetables and fruits. However, the link between low socioeconomic status and obesity has not been conclusively established, and recent obesity research shows that childhood obesity, for instance, is also increasing among high-income groups.
Childhood obesity has been a major concern of the Obamas’ Obesity Taskforce.1 Two indicators that this author would consider in evaluating the healthfulness of a neighborhood regarding childhood obesity are: 1) its safety in order to promote walking and other physical activities as opposed to sedentary activities. (TV, Internet, talking on cell) 1 and 2) accessibility to fast food (McDonald’s) vs. organic food.1
America is a wealthy nation, yet 10.6% of households with children (4.2 million) suffer from food insecurity [1]. Low-income households are also much more likely than others to suffer from childhood hunger, caused by a recurrent or involuntary lack of food. The USDA defines food insecurity as “limited or uncertain availability of nutritionally adequate and safe foods or limited or uncertain ability to acquire acceptable foods in socially acceptable ways” [2]. Yet, obesity of children in America has become a crosscutting demographic epidemic. While most Americans are affected by the social and environmental causes of energy intake exceeding energy expenditure, research has also linked poverty