The title of the film watched itself gives a story. The title “The Citizen” infers that it will be about somebody who goes through the journey of becoming a citizen. The intended audience of the film includes adults to see the story of a man who started from nothing who rises the social and economic ladders. The Citizen starts with the main character, Ibrahim, winning the green card lottery and being allowed into the United States one day before the attacks on the twin towers in New York. Ibrahim lands in New York where he is interviewed by customs as to why he wanted to enter the United States, who he knows here, and what he wishes to accomplish in the States. The officer who questions him becomes suspicious when Ibrahim spoke of his …show more content…
Ibrahim leaves and gets a hotel room in Brooklyn where he meets Diane, his first friend in the States. Ibrahim and Diane go out and explore New York together where they become close. Ibrahim tells Diane that he is from Lebanon and moved between different countries before he ended up in the States. Ibrahim is walking through the streets of New York when he comes across a supermarket where he finds a new friend, Mo. While he is here speaking to Mo, an airplane destroys one of the twin towers. Twenty minutes later, another plane destroys the other twin tower. The next day, Ibrahim and Diane go to a blood drive to help the world trade center victims. Soon after, Ibrahim is arrested and questioned for six months. He is questioned because his arrival one day before this tragedy was highly suspect and the officer who interviewed him at customs was suspicious of him and marked him as a red flag. While he was being held, he was questioned about his cousin and his whereabouts. It turns out that Ibrahim has the same last name as one of the hijackers that ran a plan into one of the twin towers. The hijacker not only shared his last …show more content…
I felt that the story was well told but could have had more poverty and hardships shown throughout the film. I also felt like the court case seemed too short and should have been better defended on the prosecutors’ side to add effect and emotion to the film. My favorite part of the film was the court case, even though I think it should have been longer. I felt the way Ibrahim answered the questions from the prosecutor and his lawyer were very well said and amusing. “Maybe you should read the constitution before asking your questions.” was one of the funny things that Ibrahim said to the prosecutor. From this film, I learned how hard it can be for somebody to immigrate to the U.S. from a country associated with terrorism. This impacts me especially because I see individuals daily who are obviously from the Middle-East and will now wonder how hard it was for them to get here and if they have any trouble throughout their lives here in the U.S.. Nothing really surprised me in the movie except the homeless man stealing everything of value in Diane and Ibrahim’s apartment. I sensed the possibility but was still surprised that it happened. I feel that somebody in the same situation would think twice before breaking the trust of friends who are trying to help you, who put a roof over your head and feed you. I felt that one drawback of the film was the obviously low budget to make the movie. I feel like the movie could
After watching the movie A Civil Action, I was blown away by the statistics shown in this movie. Not to mention, the fact that four lawyers gave up their homes, retirement plans, saving accounts, and everything in their office screamed to me how dedicated they are to succeed at this case. It truly shows that they care about the families who were affected deeply by the loss of their children. Specifically, the main lawyer Jan was the only one who truly cared for their families loss. For example, each family gets $375,000 after the trials(1). I thought it was interesting that even after all the lawyers did for the families, money still wasn’t going make things better or even replace the loss that the lawyers are feeling. In addition, I found
Audiences can easily understand the tough life that government brought to people through the novel. Although the film was based on the novel but some details and skills they used were different and because of the changing in detail, some meanings were different, too. One of the differneces between
Citizenfour is a documentary in which Laura Poitras starts receiving strange anonymous e-mails from a man that called himself by the name of "CitizenFour," that’s why the documentary is named that way. This anonymous guy said that he had evidence of illegal monitoring programs held by the NSA, CIA, GCHQ and many others agencies working worldwide. Months later after that, she and 2 guys named Glenn Greenwald and Ewen MacAskill (which are reporters) fly all the way to Hong Kong in order to meet with this anonymous citizenfour man. When they got there, they found out that the man turned out to be Edward Snowden. Throughout the rest of the film, Edward or “citizenfour” starts to reveal all the shocking information he has. This film not only brings to
The cinematography in the movie adds a tremendous amount of experience to the film. The film follows the lives of several characters that come from different walks of life. It is important for the mood setting of the plot to use different techniques to help the viewer assume the role of witness. This role is essential to the main idea of the film, which is a reflection of us and our natural feelings that at times may be described as racist.
Through what is asserted to be extraordinary compared to other movies, a progression of stories uncovers the story behind Charles Foster Kane. The story, alongside the progressive cinematography, made it a film a very long time comparatively radical where Orson Welles, Charlie Kane, makes a few disputable strides on his street to significance. Nevertheless, Citizen Kane makes it clear that riches can't really purchase bliss. This is shown in Charles and Emily's breakfast scene through amazing utilization of imagery, point of view, costuming, the soundtrack, and even through exchange.
South of the Border is a 2009 American documentary film about Oliver Stone’s trip to Venezuela to meet president, Hugo Chávez. Oliver Stone himself directed it. The documentary examines how United States free-market policies have affected Latin America’s income. It also displayed how Chávez took a turn towards left wing governments in Latin America’s democracy. And due to such financial catastrophes, it has lead to a socialist uprising. In addition, the documentary included critical interviews with the president of Venezuela Hugo Chávez and Tariq Ali. Ali, who is also the screenplay writer of the project, seems to finds this documentary film to be a political pathway for power. When Ali was interviewed, he explained the importance and
A film released in 1941 that tells the story of a man thrown into high social class. The audience witnesses the predicament of a man, who is split in half between his polar personalities. Charles Foster Kane has recently died and the predicament of interpreting his life and its meaning is left upon a single reporter. “…A group of prominent films critics were asked to list the greatest directors and the greatest films, Orson Welles and Citizen Kane both came in first (Carringer 32).” Orson Welles’ produces, co-wrote, directed, and starred in the great American classic film, Citizen Kane, at the age of 26. Throughout this entire film, the audience is morally challenged along with being entertained about the rise and fall of an American hero or villain depending on which way you look at it. It is unquestioned that this film achieved great things in cinema. Welles’ utilizes the techniques of deep focus, close ups, visual symbolism, and using several perspectives to tell the story of Charles Foster Kane.
No one can sum up a man 's life into one word. This was a thought--intriguingly an idea in the film that still resonates today in our society. Citizen Kane (1941) is an important film that reflected society 's false belief of the American Dream during its time. The film was directed and starred by Orson Welles and tells a story of a man name Charles Foster Kane, who had everything and who lived an ideal life that everyone wanted to have. However, having many fine possessions of things and a great deal amount of money at his disposal, did not make him happy. The film reflects on Mr. Kane 's life before his death and his legacy. Citizen Kane shows how during the era, people wanted to have financial security, happiness and to gain material success. Although the American Dream is still something people want today, Citizen Kane shows how attaining the American Dream was something less of a dream during its era. The film also show the changes of the American Dream from 'dream ' to 'myth ' and explores the dark side of the held belief.
The film speaks about racism, prejudice and the hardships of coming to a new country and culture, the struggle with adjusting to a new culture without loosing your own. I can't relate personally because my family have lived in Sweden for generations so I have never had to face the same problems or difficulties of being new to a country, but I can sympathise with the millions of people who have fled their own countries.
When people look at most of today’s TV shows, advertisements, and films what do they see? They see a lot of white people. The ratio of white to other races is very unproportioned. Tv, and shows movies are usually a lot of white people with the occasional black friend. In almost every film, an Indians have a strong stereotypical Indian accent. Not every Indian talks like that. Media and film should be more diverse by giving minorities more opportunities, and stop portraying minorities in a bad way.
Citizenfour is a documentary film, featuring Edward Snowden and the NSA spying scandal. The film, directed by Laura Poitras, won many prestigious awards, including Oscar in February 2015. Laura Poitras, her crew, journalists, including Edward Snowden himself, took a great risk to capture the frightening realm of being a whistleblower in our modern culture. Undoubtedly, Citizenfour is a great piece of modern documentary history. Despite a rising threat and fears during the process of filming, ethical dilemmas, and public controversies afterwards, the documentarians who made “Citizenfour” acted ethically in making and distributing the work without any reasonable doubt.
I think the film represents its subject plainly and simply as is and lets the subject matter mostly speak for itself. The main point in the film is the fact that the government is spying on its’ own citizens. This kind of violation of our rights is relevant to everyone and I believe that message is conveyed well within the film, and that its importance is really clearly stated. The film does not focus on any one group of people or stereotype, but is written for the average
The last section focused on how the definition of citizenship is expanded when the author’s Discourse Theory of Citizenship
The thing that caught my eye was that the film kept me intrigued in a way that many documentaries have not been able to. The documentary did a pretty good job of switching between statistics and personal stories that keep me really engaged. The word “criminals” was something that came up several times and that is focused on the connection of beliefs of criminals in history. It seemed that based off the film the definition of criminals always changed to work in favor for the people that were in power. For example, Jim Crow laws were placed to keep terror within the south and it lead to many African-American especially males to be classified as criminals. This definition was also extended to include protestors and civil activities during the
With regard to the concepts of citizenship, there have been a significant variety of understandings. Specifically, in Marshall’s perspective (1950, p30), citizenship consists of civil, political, and social citizenship. In addition, Marshall argues that the development of civil citizenship expanded, involving political citizenship and social citizenship. Based on the three-dimension model of citizenship, Marshall, in