preview

Figurative Gold In An Ideal Husband

Decent Essays

In his 1895 stage play, it would seem Oscar Wilde borrowed a concept that his American literary colleague Mark Twain coined in his 1873 novel by the name of The Gilded Age. Referring to the period of the second Industrial Revolution, spanning from 1870 to 1900, both Twain and Wilde—acclaimed satirists of their respective nations—highlight the hypocrisy of the corruption and rampant capitalism of the time. Twain satirized the American industrial greats like Rockefeller and Carnegie and their vast wealth against the backdrop of the laborers and farmers. In An Ideal Husband, Wilde satirizes stand-ins for English industrialists and goes a step further to criticize his own society through a somewhat bitter lens (the only sort of lens to reap such …show more content…

Embodying the figurative gold plating on the surface is the aristocracy that revels in quite literal gold and wealth. They shine on the surface of society, the veritable upper crust, but, like thin gold plating, the elite could not survive on their own. The working class who, appropriately, survived by toiling in factories creating metal goods supports the aristocracy from beneath, the hunk of scrap metal beneath the gold. Consequently, English society appears to be entirely made of rich, happy people, but what supports the veneer of contentment is actually the exploited, unhappy workers and farmers. Further, another layer to the metaphor of appearance contradicting reality are senses of frivolity and satisfaction accompanying the upper classes that outshine the civil unrest of the lower classes, having to endure harsh conditions in the factories in near slave-like existence. The whole society around which Wilde sets his play, An Ideal Husband, creates a poignant backdrop that accentuates the gilded nature of the rest of his …show more content…

Wilde challenges whether high status should be so desired and coveted through analyzing how people achieve that status. For instance, Sir Robert is outwardly an upstanding citizen, who is fighting for the oppressed and is “intensely admired by the few, and deeply respected by the many” (Wilde), but has achieved his status through questionable and illegal methods. Through this conflict of character where a man of high status is not as he appears, Wilde poses the thought that if being wealthy is a superior position in society, but one can attain that status through any means—as per one’s own moral compass—without scrutiny, perhaps that position should not be so coveted. He further challenges this idea with the complication of Mrs. Cheveley. This woman is treacherous in her conduct towards others, which seems an undesirable trait, but is as how she appears, unlike any other character in the play. She does not pretend to be anything other than what she is and does not participate in the widespread hypocrisy. By putting Sir Robert’s integrity into question and having Mrs. Cheveley maintain a constant appearance, Wilde poses another thought for consideration: perhaps people like Mrs. Cheveley—people who are holding wealthy people accountable by looking beyond their good reputation—are necessary to

Get Access