preview

False Confession And Wrongful Conviction In Arthur Miller's The Crucible

Decent Essays

Erma Faye Stewart, Antron McCray, Yusef Salaam, Korey Wise, Raymond Santana and Kevin Richardson. What do they all have in common? They were all found guilty and charged with a crime they didn’t commit, yet all of them sealed their fate themselves with a false confession to the crime. False Confession and Wrongful Convictions, they are a big reason that innocent people still go to prison in the modern day and many people have never heard or thought about it. Throughout history, people have tried to find the truth about crimes and torture was an effective way of getting a false confession. It is effective because it creates a situation for the victim where confessing, even though the victim might be innocent, would be better than not confessing. This situation is how most false confessions arise. This situation where confessing to something you didn’t commit is better than not confessing is clearly seen taking place in multiple areas of Arthur Miller’s 1953 play, The Crucible. Due to the common occurrence of this phenomenon, in times hundreds of years ago and the modern day, we must ask what causes the decision in someone to make a false confession and be falsely convicted for something they never did and how can we prevent this in order to acquire better truths and protect the innocent. False confessions and wrongful convictions have been around forever. In medieval times and long before, torture was used as a way to try to get information from people. It often worked/’ in

Get Access