preview

FCT Intervention Summary

Decent Essays

Ganz, Lashley, and Rispoli (2010) implemented FCT interventions into multiple children's treatment plans. Their research focused, specifically, on two children who had Autism Spectrum Disorder diagnoses, because neither of the children made significant communication gains after the implementation of the FCT, specifically PECS, treatment. The researchers brought up the lack of literature focusing on FCT (PECS) interventions that do not end up positively impacting a child's communication abilities. Like Tiger, Hanley, and Bruzek (2008); the authors of this article made suggestions regarding the areas the practitioner (whoever is creating the FCT intervention) should evaluate before implementing a PECS, or picture identification, intervention. …show more content…

Ganz and Simpson (2004) were attempting to discredit this argument. They did this by trying to determine if the language abilities of three children with ASD would increase after the inclusion of a PECS program into their treatment plans. The researchers in this article found that two of the children who took part in this study made large gains in their ability to use the PECS system (they were both able to make it the phase 4). However, the third participant was unable to master any levels of the PECS protocol and, instead, had to use a modified PECS system. They also found that none of the three participants readily verbalized their wants at any point of the PECS phases, showing that the use of PECS is not always going to lead to an increase in expressive communication skills. This result adds strength to the argument that PECS interventions, don't increase the verbal communication abilities of children with ASD. However, the PECS program was still able to increase requesting capabilities. The researchers brought up other areas that require further research. These areas included; the need to understand comorbid diagnoses, other factors that might lead to an individual not being positively affected by a PECS program, and the modification of …show more content…

requesting, speaking, etc.). These deficiencies affect everyday interactions, and their ability to communicate wants/needs, which can lead to a child engaging in maladaptive behaviors, if they have gone a long enough without having a viable means to communicate what they want. The deficits they experience can also lead to communication difficulties for younger siblings. Based on the current literature, and the articles included above, one can conclude when a practitioner implements an FCT intervention correctly, it is a viable, and useful, treatment method to utilize when working to increase the communication abilities of children who have an ASD diagnosis. Functional Communication Training covers a broad range of treatments; a commonly used treatment is the PECS intervention. PECS is a picture-based, multi-step intervention where a child is required to hand over the picture card of the toy they want to earn. From the literature, one can deduce that PECS, and other picture identification systems, are useful when it comes to decreasing a child's maladaptive behaviors, and increasing a child's communication abilities, specifically their requesting skills. When a child has a way to request the item they want, they are less likely to take part in the behaviors that previously occurred when they didn't have a way to communicate their wants. Meaning,

Get Access