preview

Examples Of Logical Fallacies In The Crucible

Decent Essays

Logical Fallacies in The Crucible Individuals can connect two varying events to form assumptions that they base solely on the order of events, known as a post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy. Corey Giles states how his wife reading books certainly ties to his ability to pray: “and then she close her book and walks out of the house. And suddenly–mark this–I could pray again” (Miller 40). Miller shows how individuals can place blame on others with very little proof. This scene depicts how individuals can believe that events which occur sequentially do not necessarily have a connection. Therefore, these wrong conclusions can cause individuals to wrongly place blame on others. Mrs. Putnam recognizes Goody Osburn as a witch because of their past encounters: …show more content…

Mrs. Putnam assumes the Devil influences her daughter because of her illness: “she ails as she must – she never waked this morning, but her eyes open and she walks, and hears naught, sees, naught, and cannot eat. Her soul is taken, surely” (Miller 13). Miller inputs a hasty generalization into this scene to implicate how quickly individuals can form incorrect conclusions. One must gather multiple reasons to logically make generalizations. In the play, many individuals accuse others based upon abrupt criticisms, leading to confusion and miscommunication of information. Giles Corey explains how others use improbable reasoning for incriminating his wife: “he goes to court and claims that from that day to this he cannot keep a pig alive for more than four weeks because my Martha bewitch them with her books” (Miller 72). Miller portrays how hasty generalizations can cause wrongful consequences to fall on innocent individuals. Accusations form when people want to find answers to every dispute, even when they cannot find solutions. As shown in The Crucible, unevaluated observations can affect others when they mistakenly place blame on

Get Access